Reinforcement value of gustatory stimuli determined by progressive ratio performance

Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior

Volumn 63, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 301-311

  Reilly, Steve ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Citric acid; Progressive ratio Haloperidol; Quinine; Rat; Reinforcement value; Saccharin; Sodium chloride; Sucrose

Indexed keywords

CITRIC ACID; HALOPERIDOL; QUININE; SACCHARIN; SODIUM CHLORIDE; SUCROSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; FOOD DEPRIVATION; NONHUMAN; ORAL DRUG ADMINISTRATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; REINFORCEMENT; SUBCUTANEOUS DRUG ADMINISTRATION; TASTE; WATER DEPRIVATION;

ANIMALS; ANTIPSYCHOTIC AGENTS; APPETITIVE BEHAVIOR; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FOOD DEPRIVATION; HALOPERIDOL; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; REINFORCEMENT SCHEDULE; SACCHARIN; SUCROSE; TASTE; WATER DEPRIVATION;

CINCHONA PUBESCENS;

EID: 0032904194     PISSN: 00913057     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0091-3057(99)00009-X     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Arnold J.M., Roberts D.C.S. A critique of fixed and progressive ratio schedules used to examine the neural substrates of drug reinforcement. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 57:1997;441-447.
2. Bonem M., Crossman E.K. Elucidating the effects of reinforcement magnitude. Psychol. Bull. 104:1988;348-362.
3. Braun J.J. Gustatory cortex. Definition and function Kolb B., Tees R.C. The cerebral cortex of the rat. 1990;407-430 MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
4. Collier G. Some properties of saccharin as a reinforcer. J. Exp. Psychol. 64:1962;184-191.
5. Collier G., Bolles R.C. Hunger, thirst, and their interaction as determinants of sucrose consumption. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 66:1968;633-641.
6. Davis J.D., Levine M.W. A model for the control of ingestion. Psychol. Rev. 84:1977;379-413.
7. Depoortere R.Y., Li D.H., Lane J.D., Emmett-Oglesby M.W. Parameters of self-administration of cocaine in rats under a progressive-ratio schedule. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 45:1993;539-548.
8. Dess N.K. Saccharin's aversive taste in rats. Evidence and implications Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 17:1993;359-372.
9. Ettenberg A. Dopamine, neuroleptics and reinforced behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 13:1989;105-111.
10. Findley J.D. Preference and switching under concurrent schedules. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 1:1958;123-144.
11. Griffiths R.R., Brady J.V., Snell J.D. Progressive-ratio performance maintained by drug infusions. Comparison of cocaine, diethylpropion, chlorphentamine, and fenfluramine Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 56:1978;5-13.
12. Guttman N. Equal-reinforcement values for sucrose and glucose solutions compared with equal-sweetness values. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 47:1954;358-361.
13. Hammer L.R. Relationship of reinforcement value to consummatory behavior. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 66:1968;667-672.
14. Heyman G.M., Monaghan M.M. Reinforcer magnitude (sucrose concentration) and the matching law theory of response strength. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 61:1994;505-516.
15. Hodos W. Progressive ratio as a measure of reward strength. Science. 134:1961;943-944.
16. Hodos W. Motivational properties of long durations of rewarding brain stimulation. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 59:1965;219-224.
17. Hodos W., Kalman G. Effects of increment size and reinforcer volume on progressive ratio performance. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 6:1963;387-392.
18. Hubner C.B., Moreton J.E. Effects of selective D1 and D2 dopamine antagonists on cocaine self-administration in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 105:1991;151-156.
19. Hutt P.J. Rate of bar pressing as a function of quality and quantity of food reward. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 47:1954;235-239.
20. Keesey R.E., Goldstein M.D. Use of progressive fixed-ratio procedures in the assessment of intracranial reinforcement. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 11:1968;293-301.
21. Killeen P.R. Incentive theory. IV. Magnitude of reward J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 43:1985;407-417.
22. Loh E.A., Roberts D.C. Break-points on a progressive ratio schedule reinforced by intravenous cocaine increase following depletion of forebrain serotonin. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 101:1990;262-266.
23. Macenski M.J., Schaal D.W., Cleary J., Thompson T. Changes in food-motivated progressive ratio responding of rats following chronic buprenorphine or methadone administration. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 47:1994;379-383.
24. Norgren R., Grigson P.S. The role of the central gustatory system in learned taste aversions. Ono T., McNaughton B., Molotchnikoff S., Rolls E., Nishijo H. Perception, memory, and emotion. Frontiers in neuroscience:1996;479-497 Pergamon Press, New York.
25. Oakley B. Impaired operant behavior following lesions of the thalamic taste nucleus. J. Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 58:1965;202-210.
26. Poncelet M., Chermat R., Soubrie P., Simon P. The progressive ratio schedule as a model for studying the psychomotor stimulant activity of drugs in the rat. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 80:1983;184-189.
27. Reed P. Multiple determinants of the effects of reinforcement magnitude on free-operant response rats. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 55:1991;109-123.
28. Reilly S. The role of the gustatory thalamus in taste-guided behavior. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 22:1998;883-901.
29. Reilly, S.: The parabrachial nucleus and conditioned taste aversion. Brain Res. Bull. (in press).
30. Richardson N.R., Roberts D.C.S. Progressive ratio schedules in drug self-administration studies in rats. A method to evaluate reinforcing efficacy J. Neurosci. Methods. 66:1996;1-11.
31. Roberts D.C., Loh E.A., Vickers G. Self-administration of cocaine on a progressive ratio schedule in rats. Dose-response relationship and effect of haloperidol pretreatment Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 97:1989;535-538.
32. Skjoldager P., Pierre P.J., Mittleman G. Reinforcer magnitude and progressive ratio responding in the rat. Effects of increased effort, prefeeding, and extinction Learn. Motiv. 24:1993;303-343.
33. Spector A.C. Gustatory function in the parabrachial nuclei. Implications from lesion studies in rats Rev. Neurosci. 6:1995;143-175.
34. Stewart W.J. Progressive reinforcement schedules. A review and evaluation Aust. J. Psychol. 27:1975;9-22.
35. Thomas J.R. Interaction between hyperbaric air and d-amphetamine effects on performance. Psychopharmacology (Berlin). 48:1976;69-73.
36. Willner P., Phillips G., Muscat R. Suppression of rewarded behavior by neuroleptic drugs. Can't or won't, and why? Willner P., Scheel-Kruger J. The mesolimbic dopamine system. From motivation to action:1991;251-271 Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
37. Willner P., Scheel-Kruger J., The mesolimbic dopamine system From motivation to action. 1991;Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
38. Xenakis S., Sclafani A. The effects of pimozide on the consumption of a palatable saccharin-glucose solution in the rat. Pharmacol. Biochem. Behav. 15:1981;435-442.