An inductive reasoning approach for building system safety risk models of aviation accidents

Journal of Risk Research

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 479-499

  Oztekin, Ahmet E ^a   Luxhøj, James T ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL AND SYSTEMS ENGINEERING   (United States)

Author keywords

Aviation safety analysis; Bayesian networks; Case based reasoning; Decision support; Risk analysis

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT MODELS; ACCIDENT SCENARIOS; AVIATION SAFETY; AVIATION SAFETY ANALYSIS; BUILDING SYSTEMS; CAUSAL MODEL; DECISION SUPPORT; DECISION SUPPORT TOOLS; DECISION SUPPORTS; INDUCTIVE REASONING; MAJOR ACCIDENTS; PROTOTYPE TOOLS; SAFETY RISKS;

AVIATION; BAYESIAN NETWORKS; CASE BASED REASONING; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; DISTRIBUTED PARAMETER NETWORKS; INDEXING (OF INFORMATION); INFERENCE ENGINES; INTELLIGENT NETWORKS; KNOWLEDGE BASED SYSTEMS; RISK ANALYSIS; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY FACTOR; SECURITY SYSTEMS; SEED;

AIRCRAFT ACCIDENTS;

EID: 77952898219     PISSN: 13669877     EISSN: 14664461     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13669870903484344     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aeronautica Civil of the Republic of Colombia. 1996. Controlled flight into terrain, American Airlines Flight 965, Boeing 757-223, N651AA, near Cali, Colombia, December 20, 1995. Santafe de Bogota: Aeronautica Civil of the Republic of Colombia.
2. Andres, D.M., J.T. Luxhøj, and D.W. Coit. 2005. Modeling of human-system risk and safety: Aviation case studies as exemplars. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 5, no.2: 137-167
3. Ayyub, B.M. 2001. Elicitation of expert opinions for uncertainty and risks. New York: CRC Press.
4. Boeing Commercial Airplanes. 2004. Airplane safety, Boeing, May, Seattle, WA.
5. Kardes, E., and J.T. Luxhøj. 2005a. A hierarchical probabilistic approach for risk assessments of an aviation safety product portfolio. Air Traffic Control Quarterly 13, no.3: 279-308.
6. ---. 2005b. The use of representative indices in hierarchical influence diagram modeling: A case study. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 5, no.3: 217-238
7. Kolodner, J.L., and D.B. Leake. 1996. A tutorial introduction to case-based reasoning. CBR experiences, lessons, and future directions. Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press.
8. Leake, D.B. 1996. Case-base reasoning experiences, Lessons, and future directions. Cambridge, MA: AAAI Press/MIT Press.
9. Lechner, K.W., and J.T. Luxhøj. 2005. Probabilistic causal modeling of risk factors contributing to runway collisions: Case studies. Human Factors and Aerospace Safety 5, no.3: 185-216.
10. Luxhøj, J.T. 2003. Probabilistic causal analysis for system safety risk assessments in commercial air transport. Paper presented at the proceedings of the workshop on Investigating and Reporting of Incidents and Accidents (IRIA), September 16-19, in Williamsburg, VA.
11. ---. 2005. Model-based reasoning for aviation safety risk assessments. SAE World Aerospace Congress, October 3-6, in Dallas/Fort Worth.
12. Luxhøj, J.T., A. Choopavang, and D.N. Arendt. 2001. Risk assessment of organizational factors in aviation systems. Special issue on Flight Safety, Air Traffic Control Quarterly 9, no.3: 135-174
13. Luxhøj, J.T., and D.W. Coit. 2005. Towards safer skies: A probabilistic approach to risk assessment of new aviation safety products. Paper presented at the European Safety and Reliability Conference (ESREL), June 27-30, in Tri-City, Poland.
14. ---. 2006. Modeling low probability/high consequence events: An aviation safety risk model. The Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium, January 23-26, in Newport Beach, CA (Invited Paper).
15. Luxhøj, J.T., M. Jalil, and S.M. Jones. 2003. A risk-based decision support tool for evaluating aviation technology integration in the national airspace system. Paper presented at the proceedings of the AIAA's 3rd Annual Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Technical Forum, November 17-19, in Denver, CO.
16. NASA. 2002. NASA Aviation Safety Program (AvSP) Product Dictionary. NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, February.
17. NTSB (National Transportation Safety Board). 1993. Aircraft Accident Report, PB93-910401, NTSB/AAR-93/01, National Transportation Board, Washington, DC.
18. O'Keefe, R.M., O. Balci, and E.P. Smith. 1987. Validating expert system performance. IEEE Expert 2: 81-90.
19. O'Leary, D.E. 1993. Verification and validation of case-based systems. Expert Systems with Applications 6: 57-66.
20. O'Leary, T.J., M. Goul, K.E. Moffitt, and A.E. Radwan. 1990. Validating expert systems. IEEE Expert 5: 51-58
21. Oztekin, A., and J.T. Luxhøj. 2005. A case-based reasoning (CBR) approach for representing and indexing aviation accidents. Paper presented at the 9th world multi-conference on Systems, Cybernetics and Informatics, July 10-13, in Orlando, FL.
22. Pearl, L. 1988. Probabilistic reasoning in intelligent systems: Networks of plausible inference. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
23. Reason, J. 1995. A systems approach to organizational error. Ergonomics 38, no.8: 1708-1721
24. ---. 1997. Managing the risks of organizational accidents. Aldershot: Ashgate.
25. Renooij, S. 2001. Probability elicitation for belief networks: Issues to consider. The Knowledge Engineering Review 16, no.3: 225-269
26. White House Commission on Aviation Safety and Security. 1997. http://fas.org/irp/threat/ 212fin~1.html (accessed May 2008).
27. Wiegmann, D.A., and S.A. Shappell. 2003. A human error approach to aviation accident analysis: The human factors analysis and classification system. Aldershot: Ashgate.
28. Yin, R. 2003. Case study research: Design and methods. 3rd ed. London: Sage.