An interaction-motif-based scoring function for protein-ligand docking

BMC Bioinformatics

Volumn 11, Issue , 2010, Pages

  Xie, Zhong Ru ^a,b   Hwang, Ming Jing ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL YANG MING UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b INSTITUTE OF BIOMEDICAL SCIENCES   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPLEX CONFORMATION; DOCKING SCORING FUNCTION; NETWORK-BASED APPROACH; PAIRWISE INTERACTION; PROTEIN-LIGAND COMPLEXES; PROTEIN-LIGAND DOCKING; PROTEIN-LIGAND INTERACTIONS; ROOT-MEAN SQUARE DEVIATION;

BENCHMARKING; COMPLEX NETWORKS; COMPLEXATION; CONFORMATIONS; MATHEMATICAL TRANSFORMATIONS; MOLECULAR MODELING;

DOCKING;

LIGAND; PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; BINDING SITE; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DATABASE;

BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; LIGANDS; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEINS;

EID: 77952850252     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-11-298     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Cummings MD, DesJarlais RL, Gibbs AC, Mohan V, Jaeger EP. Comparison of automated docking programs as virtual screening tools. J Med Chem 2005, 48(4):962-976. 10.1021/jm049798d, 15715466.
2. Grzybowski BA, Ishchenko AV, Shimada J, Shakhnovich EI. From knowledge-based potentials to combinatorial lead design in silico. Acc Chem Res 2002, 35(5):261-269. 10.1021/ar970146b, 12020163.
3. Schneider G, Bohm HJ. Virtual screening and fast automated docking methods. Drug Discov Today 2002, 7(1):64-70. 10.1016/S1359-6446(01)02091-8, 11790605.
4. Taylor RD, Jewsbury PJ, Essex JW. A review of protein-small molecule docking methods. J Comput Aided Mol Des 2002, 16(3):151-166. 10.1023/A:1020155510718, 12363215.
5. Warren GL, Andrews CW, Capelli AM, Clarke B, LaLonde J, Lambert MH, Lindvall M, Nevins N, Semus SF, Senger S, Tedesco G, Wall ID, Woolven JM, Peishoff CE, Head MS. A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J Med Chem 2006, 49(20):5912-5931. 10.1021/jm050362n, 17004707.
6. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR, Bajorath J. Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2004, 3(11):935-949. 10.1038/nrd1549, 15520816.
7. Halperin I, Ma B, Wolfson H, Nussinov R. Principles of docking: An overview of search algorithms and a guide to scoring functions. Proteins 2002, 47(4):409-443. 10.1002/prot.10115, 12001221.
8. Ferrara P, Gohlke H, Price DJ, Klebe G, Brooks CL. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions. J Med Chem 2004, 47(12):3032-3047. 10.1021/jm030489h, 15163185.
9. Wang R, Lu Y, Wang S. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking. J Med Chem 2003, 46(12):2287-2303. 10.1021/jm0203783, 12773034.
10. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC, Leach AR, Taylor R. Development and validation of a genetic algorithm for flexible docking. J Mol Biol 1997, 267(3):727-748. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0897, 9126849.
11. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC. Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J Mol Biol 1995, 245(1):43-53. 10.1016/S0022-2836(95)80037-9, 7823319.
12. Morris GM, Goodsell DS, Halliday RS, Huey R, Hart WE, Belew RK, Olson AJ. Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J Comput Chem 1998, 19:1639-1662.
13. Kramer B, Rarey M, Lengauer T. Evaluation of the FLEXX incremental construction algorithm for protein-ligand docking. Proteins 1999, 37(2):228-241. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0134(19991101)37:2<228::AID-PROT8>3.0.CO;2-8, 10584068.
14. Weiner PK, Kollman PA. AMBER--assisted model building with energy refinement--a general program for modeling molecules and their interactions. J Comput Chem 1981, 2:287-303.
15. Rarey M, Kramer B, Lengauer T, Klebe G. A fast flexible docking method using an incremental construction algorithm. J Mol Biol 1996, 261(3):470-489. 10.1006/jmbi.1996.0477, 8780787.
16. Eldridge MD, Murray CW, Auton TR, Paolini GV, Mee RP. Empirical scoring functions: I. The development of a fast empirical scoring function to estimate the binding affinity of ligands in receptor complexes. J Comput Aided Mol Des 1997, 11(5):425-445. 10.1023/A:1007996124545, 9385547.
17. Sousa SF, Fernandes PA, Ramos MJ. Protein-ligand docking: current status and future challenges. Proteins 2006, 65(1):15-26. 10.1002/prot.21082, 16862531.
18. Muegge I, Martin YC. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach. J Med Chem 1999, 42(5):791-804. 10.1021/jm980536j, 10072678.
19. Gohlke H, Hendlich M, Klebe G. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions. J Mol Biol 2000, 295(2):337-356. 10.1006/jmbi.1999.3371, 10623530.
20. Velec HF, Gohlke H, Klebe G. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction. J Med Chem 2005, 48(20):6296-6303. 10.1021/jm050436v, 16190756.
21. Leach AR, Shoichet BK, Peishoff CE. Prediction of protein-ligand interactions. Docking and scoring: successes and gaps. J Med Chem 2006, 49(20):5851-5855. 10.1021/jm060999m, 17004700.
22. Tirado-Rives J, Jorgensen WL. Contribution of conformer focusing to the uncertainty in predicting free energies for protein-ligand binding. J Med Chem 2006, 49(20):5880-5884. 10.1021/jm060763i, 17004703.
23. Berman HM, Bhat TN, Bourne PE, Feng Z, Gilliland G, Weissig H, Westbrook J. The Protein Data Bank and the challenge of structural genomics. Nat Struct Biol 2000, 7(Suppl):957-959. 10.1038/80734, 11103999.
24. Roche O, Kiyama R, Brooks CL. Ligand-protein database: linking protein-ligand complex structures to binding data. J Med Chem 2001, 44(22):3592-3598. 10.1021/jm000467k, 11606123.
25. Ruvinsky AM, Kozintsev AV. The key role of atom types, reference states, and interaction cutoff radii in the knowledge-based method: new variational approach. Proteins 2005, 58(4):845-851. 10.1002/prot.20385, 15651026.
26. Shulman-Peleg A, Shatsky M, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Spatial chemical conservation of hot spot interactions in protein-protein complexes. BMC Biol 2007, 5:43. 10.1186/1741-7007-5-43, 2231411, 17925020.
27. Soper AK. The radial distribution functions of water and ice from 673 K and at pressures up to 400 MPa. Chemical Physics 2000, 258:121-137.
28. Babu MM, Luscombe NM, Aravind L, Gerstein M, Teichmann SA. Structure and evolution of transcriptional regulatory networks. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2004, 14(3):283-291. 10.1016/j.sbi.2004.05.004, 15193307.
29. Dobrin R, Beg QK, Barabasi AL, Oltvai ZN. Aggregation of topological motifs in the Escherichia coli transcriptional regulatory network. BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:10. 10.1186/1471-2105-5-10, 357809, 15018656.
30. Koyuturk M, Grama A, Szpankowski W. An efficient algorithm for detecting frequent subgraphs in biological networks. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(Suppl 1):i200-207. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bth919, 15262800.
31. Milo R, Shen-Orr S, Itzkovitz S, Kashtan N, Chklovskii D, Alon U. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 2002, 298(5594):824-827. 10.1126/science.298.5594.824, 12399590.
32. Shen-Orr SS, Milo R, Mangan S, Alon U. Network motifs in the transcriptional regulation network of Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 2002, 31(1):64-68. 10.1038/ng881, 11967538.
33. Taylor R. Life-science applications of the Cambridge Structural Database. Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr 2002, 58(Pt 6 No 1):879-888. 10.1107/S090744490200358X, 12037325.
34. Bartlett GJ, Porter CT, Borkakoti N, Thornton JM. Analysis of catalytic residues in enzyme active sites. J Mol Biol 2002, 324(1):105-121. 10.1016/S0022-2836(02)01036-7, 12421562.
35. Gutteridge A, Thornton JM. Understanding nature's catalytic toolkit. Trends Biochem Sci 2005, 30(11):622-629. 10.1016/j.tibs.2005.09.006, 16214343.
36. Petitjean A, Khoury RG, Kyritsakas N, Lehn JM. Dynamic devices. Shape switching and substrate binding in ion-controlled nanomechanical molecular tweezers. J Am Chem Soc 2004, 126(21):6637-6647. 10.1021/ja031915r, 15161291.
37. Zeeberg BR, Feng W, Wang G, Wang MD, Fojo AT, Sunshine M, Narasimhan S, Kane DW, Reinhold WC, Lababidi S, Bussey KJ, Riss J, Barrett JC, Weinstein JN. GoMiner: a resource for biological interpretation of genomic and proteomic data. Genome Biol 2003, 4(4):R28. 10.1186/gb-2003-4-4-r28, 154579, 12702209.
38. Liu WC, Lin WH, Davis AJ, Jordan F, Yang HT, Hwang MJ. A network perspective on the topological importance of enzymes and their phylogenetic conservation. BMC Bioinformatics 2007, 8:121. 10.1186/1471-2105-8-121, 1955749, 17425808.
39. Koehntop KD, Emerson JP, Que L. The 2-His-1-carboxylate facial triad: a versatile platform for dioxygen activation by mononuclear non-heme iron(II) enzymes. J Biol Inorg Chem 2005, 10(2):87-93. 10.1007/s00775-005-0624-x, 15739104.
40. Brenner C. Hint, Fhit, and GalT: function, structure, evolution, and mechanism of three branches of the histidine triad superfamily of nucleotide hydrolases and transferases. Biochemistry 2002, 41(29):9003-9014. 10.1021/bi025942q, 2571077, 12119013.
41. Brenner C, Bieganowski P, Pace HC, Huebner K. The histidine triad superfamily of nucleotide-binding proteins. J Cell Physiol 1999, 181(2):179-187. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4652(199911)181:2<179::AID-JCP1>3.0.CO;2-8, 2556047, 10497298.
42. Mashiach E, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. FiberDock: Flexible induced-fit backbone refinement in molecular docking. Proteins 2010, 78(6):1503-1519.
43. Yang JM, Chen CC. GEMDOCK: a generic evolutionary method for molecular docking. Proteins 2004, 55(2):288-304. 10.1002/prot.20035, 15048822.
44. Mintz S, Shulman-Peleg A, Wolfson HJ, Nussinov R. Generation and analysis of a protein-protein interface data set with similar chemical and spatial patterns of interactions. Proteins 2005, 61(1):6-20. 10.1002/prot.20580, 16184518.
45. Shulman-Peleg A, Shatsky M, Nussinov R, Wolfson HJ. Prediction of interacting single-stranded RNA bases by protein-binding patterns. J Mol Biol 2008, 379(2):299-316. 10.1016/j.jmb.2008.03.043, 2429989, 18452949.