New tactile sensing system for minimally invasive surgical tumour localization

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 211-220

  Perri, M T ^a,b   Trejos, A L ^a,b   Naish, M D ^a,b   Patel, R V ^a,b,c   Malthaner, R A ^a,c  

^a LONDON HEALTH SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c WESTERN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Force feedback; Haptics; Minimally invasive surgery (MIS); Tactile sensor; Tumour localization

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL ORGANS; FEEDBACK;

APPLIED PRESSURE; EX-VIVO; FORCE-FEEDBACK; HAPTICS; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGICAL; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE SURGERY; TACTILE SENSING SYSTEM; TACTILE SENSORS; TUMOUR LOCALIZATION;

TUMORS;

ACCURACY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; COW; DEVICE; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; IMAGE QUALITY; LIVER; LUNG; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; NONHUMAN; PRESSURE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIMULATION; SWINE; TACTILE SENSING SYSTEM; TUMOR LOCALIZATION; ANIMAL; BOVINAE; NEOPLASMS; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESS; TOUCH;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; NEOPLASMS; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES; PRESSURE; SWINE; TOUCH;

EID: 77952761598     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.308     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Cancer Facts and Figures 2008 [homepage on the Internet]. American Cancer Society Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA, c2000-2009; http://www.cancer.org/downloads/ STT/2008 CAFFfinalsecured.pdf [updated 2008; cited 11 February 2009].
2. Global Cancer Facts and Figures 2007 [homepage on the Internet]. American Cancer Society Inc., Atlanta, GA, USA c2000-2009; http://www.cancer.org/ downloads/STT/Global Facts and Figures 2007 rev2.pdf [updated 2007; cited 11 February 2009].
3. Lin A, Trejos AL, Patel RV, et al. Robot-assisted minimally invasive brachytherapy for lung cancer. In Telesurgery, Kumar S, Marescaux J (eds). Springer-Verlag: Berlin, 2008; 33-52.
4. LiuH, NoonanDP, AlthoeferK, et al. Rolling mechanical imaging: a novel approach for soft tissue modeling and identification during minimally invasive surgery. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 19-23 May 2008, Pasadena, CA. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ; 2008; p. 845-850.
5. Kaneko M, Toya C, Okajima M. Active strobe imager for visualizing dynamic behavior of tumours. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 10-14 April 2007, Rome, Italy. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ; 2007; p. 3009-3014. (Pubitemid 350140641)
6. Santambrogio R, Montorsi M, Bianchi P, et al. Intraoperative ultrasound during thoracoscopic procedures for solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg 1999; 68: 218-222. (Pubitemid 29338993)
7. Hornblower VDM, Yu E, Fenster A, et al. 3D thoracoscopic ultrasound volume measurement validation in an ex vivo and in vivo porcine model of lung tumors. Phys Med Biol 2007; 52: 91-106. (Pubitemid 46646268)
8. Miller AP, Peine WJ, Son JS, et al. Tactile imaging system for localizing lung nodules during video assisted thoracoscopic surgery. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, 10-14 April 2007, Rome, Italy. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ; 2007; p. 2996-3001.
9. Taylor RH, Stoianovici D. Medical robotics in computer integrated surgery. IEEE Trans Robot Automat 2003; 19(5): 765-781.
10. Ottermo MV, Øvstedal M, Langø T, et al. The role of tactile feedback in laparoscopic surgery. Surg Lap End Perc Tech 2006; 16(6): 390-400.
11. Hemsel T, Stroop R, Olivia Uribe D, et al. Resonant vibrating sensors for tactile tissue differentiation. J Sound Vibrat 2007; 308(3-5): 441-446. (Pubitemid 47483772)
12. Murayama Y, Haruta M, Hatakeyama Y, et al. Development of new instrument for examination of stiffness in the breast using haptic sensor technology. Sensors Actuators A Phys 2008; 143(2): 430-438. (Pubitemid 351451859)
13. Dargahi J, Najarian S, Ramezanifard R, et al. Fabrication and testing of a medical surgical instrument capable of detecting simulated embedded lumps. Am J Appl Sci 2009; 4(12): 957-964.
14. Kattavenos N, Lawrenson B, Frank TG, et al. Force-sensitive tactile sensor for minimal access surgery. Minim Invas Therapy Allied Tech 2004; 13(1): 42-46. (Pubitemid 38292439)
15. Sarvazyan A.Mechanical imaging: a new technology for medical diagnostics. Int J Med Informat 1998; 49: 195-216. (Pubitemid 28362440)
16. McCreery GL, Trejos AL, Patel RV, et al. Evaluation of force feedback requirements for minimally invasive lung tumor localization. In Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), 29 October-2 November 2007, San Diego, CA. IEEE: Piscataway, NJ; 2007; p. 883-888.
17. Fearing RS. Tactile sensing mechanisms. Int J Robot Research 1990; 9(3): 3-23.
18. Trejos AL, Jayender J, Perri MT, et al. Robot-assisted tactile sensing for minimally invasive tumor localization. Int J Robot Res 2009; 28(9): Special Issue on Medical Robotics: 1118-1133.
19. Perri MT, Trejos AL, Naish MD, et al. A new tactile imaging device to aid with localizing lung tumours during thoracoscopic surgery. International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery 2008; 3: S257-S258.
20. Perri MT. Tactile Sensing System for Lung Tumour Localization During Minimally Invasive Surgery. Dissertation, University of Western Ontario, Canada, 2009.
21. Le Blanc JK, DeWitt J, Sherman S. Endoscopic ultrasound: how does it aid the surgeon? Adv Surg 2007; 41: 17-50.
22. Singh P, Erickson RA, Mukhopadhyay P, et al. EUS for detection of the hepatocellular carcinoma: results of a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc 2007; 66(2): 265-273. (Pubitemid 47079027)
23. Davidson M. The interpretation of diagnostic tests: a primer for physiotherapists. Aus J Physiol 2002; 48(3): 227-232. (Pubitemid 35021639)
24. Bobich LR, Warren JP, Sweeny JD, et al. Spatial localization of electrotactile stimuli on the fingertips of humans. Somatosens Motor Res 2007; 24(4): 179-188.