Classification and virtual screening of androgen receptor antagonists

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 50, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 861-874

  Li, Jiazhong ^a,b   Gramatica, Paola ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

^b LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BINDERS; BINDING SITES; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTERS; INDICATORS (CHEMICAL); LARGE DATASET; MOLECULAR GRAPHICS;

ANDROGEN RECEPTOR ANTAGONISTS; COMPUTATIONAL TOOLS; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING CHEMICALS; ENVIRONMENTAL CHEMICALS; IN-SILICO SCREENING; PREDICTIVE ABILITIES; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIPS; SUBSTANCES OF VERY HIGH CONCERNS;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

ANDROGEN RECEPTOR; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTOR;

ARTICLE; ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; DRUG ANTAGONISM; DRUG DESIGN; HUMAN; METABOLISM; PROTEIN BINDING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DRUG DESIGN; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTORS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROTEIN BINDING; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; RECEPTORS, ANDROGEN;

EID: 77952756796     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci100078u     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Colborn, T. Environmental estrogens: health implications for humans and wildlife Environ. Health Perspect. 1995, 103, 135-136
2. Tamura, H.; Ishimoto, Y.; Fujikawa, T.; Aoyama, H.; Yoshikawa, H.; Akamatsu, M. Structural basis for androgen receptor agonists and antagonists: Interaction of SPEED 98-listed chemicals and related compounds with the androgen receptor based on an in vitro reporter gene assay and 3D-QSAR Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2006, 14, 7160-7174
3. Weintraub, B. D. In Molecular Endocrinology: Basic Concepts and Clinical Correlations, 1st ed.; Raven Press: New York, 1995; pp 195 - 215.
4. Drug-Receptor Interactions, MERCK company; http://www.merck.com/mmpe/ sec20/ch304/ch304b.html. Accessed September 7, 2009.
5. Tsai, M.; O'Malley, B. W. Molecular Mechanisms of Action of Steroid/Thyroid Receptor Superfamily Members Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1994, 63, 451-486
6. Zhou, Z. X.; Wong, C. I.; Sar, M.; Wilson, E. M. The androgen receptor: an overview Recent Prog. Horm. Res. 1994, 49, 249-274
7. Araki, N.; Ohno, K.; Nakai, M.; Takeyoshi, M.; Iida, M. Screening for androgen receptor activities in 253 industrial chemicals by in vitro reporter gene assays using AR-EcoScreenTM cells Toxicol. in Vitro 2005, 19, 831-842
8. Liu, H. X.; Papa, E.; Gramatica, P. QSAR Prediction of Estrogen Activity for a Large Set of Diverse Chemicals under the Guidance of OECD Principles Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2006, 19, 1540-1548
9. Liu, H. X.; Papa, E.; Walker, J. D.; Gramatica, P. In silico screening of estrogen-like chemicals based on different nonlinear classification models J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2007, 26, 135-144
10. Roncaglioni, A.; Piclin, N.; Pintore, M.; Benfenati, E. Binary classification models for endocrine disrupter effects mediated through the estrogen receptor SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2008, 19, 697-733
11. Liu, H. X.; Yao, X. J.; Gramatica, P. The Applications of Machine Learning Algorithms in the Modeling of Estrogen-Like Chemicals Comb. Chem. High Throughput Screening 2009, 12, 490-496
12. Li, J. Z.; Gramatica, P. The importance of molecular structures, endpoints' values, and predictivity parameters in QSAR research: QSAR analysis of a series of estrogen receptor binders. Mol. Diversity 2009. In press, DOI: 10.1007/s11030-009-9220-2.
13. Vinggaard, A. M.; Niemelä, J.; Wedebye, E. B.; Jensen, G. E. Screening of 397 Chemicals and Development of a Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Model for Androgen Receptor Antagonism Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2008, 21, 813-823
14. Fang, H.; Tong, W. D.; Branham, W. S.; Moland, C. L.; Dial, S. L.; Hong, H. X.; Xie, Q.; Perkins, R.; Owens, W.; Sheehan, D. M. Study of 202 Natural, Synthetic, and Environmental Chemicals for Binding to the Androgen Receptor Chem. Res. Toxicol. 2003, 16, 1338-1358
15. REACH; European Chemicals Agency: Helsinki, Finland; http://europa.eu. int/comm/environment/chemicals/reach.htm. Accessed June 10, 2009.
16. Tong, W.; Welsh, W. J.; Shi, L.; Fang, H.; Perkins, R. Structure-activity relationship approaches and applications Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22, 1680-1695
17. Araki, N.; Ohno, K.; Takeyoshi, M.; Iida, M. Evaluation of a rapid in vitro androgen receptor transcriptional activation assay using AR-EcoScreen(TM) cells Toxicol. in Vitro 2005, 19, 335-352
18. Kojima, H.; Katsura, E.; Takeuchi, S.; Niiyama, K.; Kobayashi, K. Screening for Estrogen and Androgen Receptor Activities in 200 Pesticides by In Vitro Reporter Gene Assays Using Chinese Hamster Ovary Cells Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 524-531
19. Schreurs, R. H. M. M.; Sonneveld, E.; van der Saag, P. T.; van der Burg, B.; Seinen, W. Examination of the in vitro (anti)estrogenic, (anti)androgenic and (anti)dioxin-like activities of tetralin, Indane and isochroman derivatives using receptor-specific bioassays Toxicol. Lett. 2005, 156, 261-275
20. Vinggaard, A. M.; Bonefeld Joergensen, E. C.; Larsen, J. C. Rapid and Sensitive Reporter Gene Assays for Detection of Antiandrogenic and Estrogenic Effects of Environmental Chemicals Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 1999, 155, 150-160
21. Körner, W.; Vinggaard, A. M.; Térouanne, B.; Ma, R. S.; Wieloch, C.; Schlumpf, M.; Sultan, C.; Soto, A. M. Interlaboratory Comparison of Four in Vitro Assays for Assessing Androgenic and Antiandrogenic Activity of Environmental Chemicals Environ. Health Perspect. 2004, 112, 695-702
22. Klopman, G. MULTICASE 1. A Hierarchical Computer Automated Structure Evaluation Program Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1992, 11, 176-184
23. Zhang, Q. Y.; Hughes-Oliver, J. M.; Ng, R. T. A Model-Based Ensembling Approach for Developing QSARs J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 1857-1865
24. Polishchuk, P. G.; Muratov, E. N.; Artemenko, A. G.; Kolumbin, O. G.; Muratov, N. N.; Kuz'min, V. E. Application of Random Forest Approach to QSAR Prediction of Aquatic Toxicity J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2009, 49, 2481-2488
25. Kachigan, S. K. Multivariate Statistical Analysis: A Conceptual Introduction. Radius Press: New York, 1991.
26. Hall, M.; Frank, E.; Holmes, G.; Pfahringer, B.; Reutemann, P.; Witten, I. H. The WEKA Data Mining Software: An Update SIGKDD Explorations 2009, 11 (1).
27. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Mauri, A.; Pavan, M. DRAGON - Software for the calculation of molecular descriptors, version 5.5 for Windows; Talete S.R.L.: Milan, Italy, 2007.
28. METI, ministry of economy trade and industry, Japan. Current status of testing methods development for endocrine disrupters. 6th meeting of the task force on endocrine disrupters testing and assessment (EDTA), Tokyo, Japan June 24-25, 2002; http://www.meti.go.jp/interface/honsho/Search/English/search-query= gEndocappendix1e&whence=0&max=20&result=normal&sort= score&idxname=meti. Accessed September 10, 2008.
29. FDA EDKB database; Food and Drug Administration (FDA): Silver Spring, MD; http://edkb.fda.gov/databasedoor.html. Accessed March, 2009.
30. PubChem database; Chemical Abstracts Service (CAS): Columbus, OH; http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pccompound. Accessed October 17, 2009.
31. Zupan, J.; Novic, M.; Ruisánchez, I. Kohonen and counterpropagation artificial neural networks in analytical chemistry Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38, 1-23
32. Gasteiger, J.; Zupan, J. Neural Networks in Chemistry Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 1993, 32, 503-527
33. HYPERCHEM, release 7.03 for Windows; Autodesk, Inc.: Sausalito, CA, 2002.
34. Burden, F. R. Molecular identification number for substructure searches J. Chem. Inform. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 225-227
35. Burden, F. R. A Chemically Intuitive Molecular Index Based on the Eigenvalues of a Modified Adjacency Matrix Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1997, 16, 309-314
36. Todeschini, R.; Gramatica, P. 3D-modelling and prediction by WHIM descriptors. Part 5. Theory development and chemical meaning of the WHIM descriptors Quant. Struct.-Act. Relat. 1997, 16, 113-119 (Pubitemid 27182829)
37. Consonni, V.; Todeschini, R.; Pavan, M. Structure/Response Correlations and Similarity/Diversity Analysis by GETAWAY Descriptors. 1. Theory of the Novel 3D Molecular Descriptors J. Chem. Inform. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 682-692 (Pubitemid 35355277)
38. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors. Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2009.
39. Vapnik, V. N. Statistical learning theory. Wiley Interscience: New York, 1998.
40. Guyon, I.; Weston, J.; Barnhill, S.; Vapnik, V. Gene Selection for Cancer Classification using Support Vector Machines Mach. Learn. 2002, 46, 389-422
41. Sharaf, M. A.; Illman, D. L.; Kowalski, B. R. Chemometrics. Wiley Interscience: New York, 1986.
42. Zheng, W. F.; Tropsha, A. Novel Variable Selection Quantitative Structure-Property Relationship Approach Based on the k-Nearest-Neighbor Principle J. Chem. Inform. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 185-194
43. Freund, Y.; Mason, L. In The alternating decision tree learning algorithm, Proceeding of the Sixteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, Bled, Slovenia, June 27-30 1999; pp 124-133.
44. Wang, H.; Klinginsmith, J.; Dong, X.; Lee, A. C.; Guha, R.; Wu, Y.; Crippen, G. M.; Wild, D. J. Chemical Data Mining of the NCI Human Tumor Cell Line Database J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2007, 47, 2063-2076
45. Liu, Y. Feature extraction and dimensionality reduction for mass spectrometry data Comput. Biol. Med. 2009, 39, 818-823
46. Eriksson, L.; Jaworska, J.; Worth, A. P.; Cronin, M. T. D.; McDowell, R. M.; Gramatica, P. Methods for Reliability and Uncertainty Assessment and for Applicability Evaluations of Classification- and Regression-Based QSARs Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111, 1361-1375
47. Tropsha, A.; Gramatica, P.; Gombar, V. K. The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 69-77
48. Gramatica, P. Principles of QSAR models validation: internal and external QSAR Comb. Sci. 2007, 26, 694-701
49. SCAN-Software for Chemometric Analysis, release 1.1 for Windows; Minitab: State College, PA, 1995.
50. Golbraikh, A.; Shen, M.; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y. D.; Lee, K. H.; Tropsha, A. Rational selection of training and test sets for the development of validated QSAR models J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2003, 17, 241-253
51. Gramatica, P.; Pilutti, P.; Papa, E. Validated QSAR Prediction of OH Tropospheric Degradation of VOCs: Splitting into Training-Test Sets and Consensus Modeling J. Chem. Inform. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1794-1802
52. Roy, P. P.; Leonard, J. T.; Roy, K. Exploring the impact of size of training sets for the development of predictive QSAR models Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2008, 90, 31-42
53. Pearlman, R.; Smith, K. Novel Software Tools for Chemical Diversity, 3D QSAR in Drug Design; Springer: Kluwer/ESCOM, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 1998; pp 339-353
54. Ganguly, M.; Brown, N.; Schuffenhauer, A.; Ertl, P.; Gillet, V. J.; Greenidge, P. A. Introducing the Consensus Modeling Concept in Genetic Algorithms: Application to Interpretable Discriminant Analysis J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2006, 46, 2110-2124
55. Baber, J. C.; Shirley, W. A.; Gao, Y.; Feher, M. The Use of Consensus Scoring in Ligand-Based Virtual Screening J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 46, 277-288
56. Sutherland, J. J.; Weaver, D. F. Development of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Classification Models for Anticonvulsant Activity of Hydantoin Analogues J. Chem. Inform. Comput. Sci. 2003, \28-1036
57. Gao, W.; Bohl, C. E.; Dalton, J. T. Chemistry and Structural Biology of Androgen Receptor Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3352-3370