Validated QSAR prediction of OH tropospheric degradation of VOCs: Splitting into training-test sets and consensus modeling

Journal of Chemical Information and Computer Sciences

Volumn 44, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 1794-1802

  Gramatica, Paola ^a   Pilutti, Pamela ^a   Papa, Ester ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF INSUBRIA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DEGRADATION; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; RATE CONSTANTS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; TROPOSPHERE;

MULTIPLE LINEAR REGRESSION; TROPOSPHERIC DEGRADATION; VARIABLE SUBSET SELECTION (VSS);

VOLATILE ORGANIC COMPOUNDS;

EID: 5444232094     PISSN: 00952338     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci049923u     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Medven, Z.; Güsten, H.; Sábljic, A. Comparative QSAR Study on Hydroxyl Radical Reactivity with Unsaturated Hydrocarbons: PLS Versus MLR. J. Chemom. 1996, 10, 135-147.
2. x. Atmos. Environ. 2000, 34, 2063-2101.
3. Meylan, W. M.; Howard P. H. A Review of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship Methods for the Prediction of Atmospheric Oxidation of Organic Chemicals.Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2003, 22 (8), 1724-1732.
4. Atkinson, R. A Structure-Activity Relationship for the Estimation of Rate Constants for the Gas-Phase Reactions of OH Radicals with Organic Compounds. Int. J. Chem. Kinet, 1987, 19, 799-828.
5. 3 Radical Reactivity in the Troposphere. Atmos. Environ. 1990, 24A, 73-78.
6. Müller, M.; Klein, W. Estimating Atmospheric Degradation Processes by SARs. Sci. Total Environ. 1991, 109, 261-273.
7. Klamt, A. Estimation of Gas-Phase Hydroxyl Radical Rate Constants of Oxygenated Compounds Based on Molecular Orbital Calculations. Chemosphere 1996, 32 (4), 717-726.
8. Bakken, G.; Jurs, P. Prediction of Hydroxyl Radical Rate Constants from Molecular Structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1999, 39, 1064-1075.
9. Gramatica, P.; Consonni, V.; Todeschini, R. QSAR Study on the Tropospheric Degradation of Organic Compounds. Chemosphere 1999, 38, 1371-1378.
10. Güsten, H. Predicting the Abiotic Degradability of Organic Pollutants in the Troposphere. Chemosphere 1999, 38 (6), 1361-1370.
11. 3 with Different Organic Compounds. Atmos. Environ, 2001, 35, 3781-3788.
12. Gramatica, P.; Pilutti, P.; Papa, E. Ranking of Volatile Organic Compounds for Tropospheric Degradability by Oxidants: a QSPR Approach. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2002, 13 (7-8), 743-753.
13. Gramatica, P.; Pilutti, P.; Papa, E. QSAR prediction of ozone tropospheric degradation. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 364-373.
14. 3 Tropospheric Degradability of Organic Pollutants by Theoretical Molecular Descriptors. Atmos. Environ. 2003, 37 (22), 3115-3124.
15. AOPWIN, Ver.1.90. Environmental Protection Agency, U.S.A., 2000.
16. Tropsha, A.; Gramatica, P.; Gombar, V. K. The Importance of Being Earnest: Validation is the Absolute Essential for Successful Application and Interpretation of QSPR Models. QSAR Comb. Sci. 2003, 22, 69-76.
17. Schultz, T. W.; Netzeva, T. I.; Cronin M. T. D. Selection of Data Sets for QSARs: Analyses of Tetrahymena Toxicity from Aromatic Compounds. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 2003, 14 (1), 59-81.
18. Golbraikh, A.; Shen, M.; Xiao, Z.; Xiao, Y.-D.; Lee, K.-H.; Tropsha, A. Rational Selection of Training Sets for the Development of Validated QSAR Models. J. Comput.-Aided Mol Des. 2003, 17, 241-253.
19. Atkinson, R. Kinetics and Mechanisms of the Gas-Phase Reactions of the Hydroxyl Radical with Organic Compounds. J. Phys. Ref. Data 1989, Monograph 1.
20. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Mauri, A.; Pavan, M. DRAGON - Software for the calculation of molecular descriptors. Version 5.0 for Windows, Talete srl, Milan, Italy, 2004.
21. HyperChem. Release 7.03 for Windows, Molecular Modeling System. Hypercube, Inc., Gainesville, Florida, U.S.A., 2002.
22. Todeschini, R.; Gramatica, P. The WHIM Theory: New 3D Molecular Descriptors for QSAR in Environmental Modelling. SAR QSAR Environ. Res. 1997, 7, 89-115.
23. Consonni, V.; Todeschini, R.; Pavan, M. Structure/Response Correlation and Similarity/Diversity Analysis by GETAWAY Descriptors. Part 1. Theory of the Novel 3D Molecular Descriptors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 693-705.
24. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V. Handbook of Molecular Descriptors; Wiley-VCH: Weinheim, Germany, 2000.
25. SCAN - Software for Chemometric Analysis. Rel. 1.1 for Windows, Minitab, U.S.A., 1995.
26. STATISTICA. Rel. 5.1 for Windows, StatSoft, Inc., U.S.A., 1987.
27. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Pavan, M. MOBY DIGS - Software for multilinear regression analysis and variable subset selection by genetic algorithm. Ver. 1.2 for Windows, Talete srl, Milan, Italy, 2002.
28. Leardi, R.; Boggia, R.; Terrile, M. Genetic Algorithms as a Strategy for Feature Selection. J. Chemom. 1992, 6, 267-281.
29. Todeschini, R.; Maiocchi, A.; Consonni, V. The K Correlation Index: Theory Development and its Application in Chemometrics. Chemom. Int. Lab. Syst. 1999, 46, 13-29.
30. Atkinson, A. C. Plots, Transformations and Regression; Clarendon Press: Oxford, 1985.
31. Eriksson, L.; Jaworska, J.; Worth, A.; Cronin, M.; McDowell, R. M.; Gramatica, P. Methods for Reliability, Uncertainty Assessment, and Applicability Evaluations of Regression Based and Classification QSARs. Environ. Health Perspect. 2003, 111 (10), 1361-1375.
32. Todeschini, R.; Mauri, A. DOLPHIN-Software for optimal distance-based experimental design. Ver. 2.0 for Windows, Talete srl, Milan, Italy, 2002.
33. Marengo, E.; Todeschini, R. A New Algorithm for Optimal Distance - Based Experimental Design. Chemom. Int. Lab. Syst. 1992, 16, 37-44.
34. Sjostrom, M.; Eriksson, L. Applications of Statistical Experimental Design, in Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design; Van de Warerbeemd H., VCH: 1995; Vol. 2, pp 63-90.
35. Eriksson, L.; Johansson, E. Multivariate Design and Modeling in QSAR. Tutorial. Chemom, Int. Lab. Syst. 1996, 34, 1-19.
36. Carlson, R. Design and Optimization in Organic Synthesis; Elsevier: 1992.
37. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V. KOALA-Software for Kohonen Artificial Neural Networks. Rel. 1.0 for Windows, Talete srl, Milan, Italy, 2001.
38. Zupan, J.; Novic, M.; Ruisánchez, I. Kohonen and Counter propagation Artificial Neural Networks in Analytical Chemistry. Chemom. Int. Lab. Syst. 1997, 38, 1-23.
39. Gasteiger, J.; Zupan, J. Neural Networks in Chemistry. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. Engl. 1993, 32, 503-527.
40. Shi, L. M.; Fang, H.; Tong, W.; Wu, J.; Perkins, R.; Blair, R. M.; Branham, W. S.; Dial, S. L.; Moland, C. L.; Sheehan, D. M. QSAR Models Using a Large Diverse Set of Estrogens. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2001, 41, 186-195.
41. Shao, J. Linear Model Selection by Cross-Validation. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1993, 88, 486-494.
42. 2! J. Mol. Graph. Model. 2002, 20, 269-276.
43. Wold, S.; Eriksson, L. Chemometric Methods in Molecular Design; VCH: Germany, 1995.
44. Pötter, T.; Matter, H. Random or Rational Design? Evolution of Diverse Compound Subsets from Chemical Structure Data Set. J. Med. Chem. 1998, 41, 478-488.
45. Burden, F. R.; Winkler, D. A. Robust QSAR Models Using Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks. J. Med. Chem. 1999, 42, 3183-3187.
46. Burden, F. R.; Ford, M. G.; Whitley, D. C.; Winkler, D. A. Use of Automatic Relevance Determination in QSAR Studies Using Bayesian Regularized Neural Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2000, 40, 1423-1430.
47. Golbraikh, A.; Tropsha, A. Predictive QSAR Modeling Based on Diversity Sampling of Experimental Datasets for the Training Set Selection. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des. 2002, 16, 357-369.
48. Bonchev, D. Information Theoretic Indices for Characterization of Chemical Structures; RSP-Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 1983.
49. Magnuson, V. R.; Harriss, D. K.; Basak, S. C. Studies in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry; King, R. B., Ed.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1983; pp 178-191.
50. Manallack, D. T.; Pitt, W. R.; Gancia, E.; Montana J. G.; Livingstone, D. J.; Ford, M. G.; Whitley, D. C. Selecting Screening Candidates for Kinase and G Protein-Coupled Receptor Targets Using Neural Networks. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 1256-1262.
51. Sutherland, J. J.; O'Brien, L. A.; Weaver, D. F. Spline-Fitting with a Genetic Algorithm: A Method for Developing Classification Structure-Activity Relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1906-1915.
52. Sutherland, J. J.; Weaver, D. F. Development of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships and Classification Models for Anticonvulsant Activity of Hydantoin Analogues. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1028-1036.
53. Todeschini, R.; Consonni, V.; Pavan, M. A Distance Measure Between Models, a Tool for Similarity/Diversity Analysis of Models Population. Chemom. Int. Lab. Syst. 2004, 70, 55-61.
54. Broto, P.; Devillers, J. Practical Applications of Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationships (QSAR) in Environmental Chemistry and Toxicology; Karcher, W., Devillers, J., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publishers: London, U.K., 1990.
55. Burden, F. R. Molecular Identification Number for Substructure Searches. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1989, 29, 225-227.