The cooperative principle in discourse communities and genres: A framework for the use of metadiscourse

Journal of Pragmatics

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1669-1679

  Abdi, Reza ^a   Rizi, Manoochehr Tavangar ^b   Tavakoli, Mansoor ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MOHAGHEGH ARDABILI   (Iran)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ISFAHAN   (Iran)

Author keywords

Collapsers; Cooperative principle; Disclaimers; Discourse community; Genre; Metadiscourse

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952744430     PISSN: 03782166     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2009.11.001     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Abdi Reza Interpersonal metadiscourse: an indicator of interaction and identity. Discourse Studies 2002, 4(2):139-145.
2. Ädel Annelie Metadiscourse in L1 and L2 English 2006, John Benjamins, Philadelphia.
3. Arrington Phillip, Rose Shirley K. Prologues to what is possible: introductions as metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 1987, 38(3):306-318.
4. Belcher Diane D. Seeking acceptance in an English-only research world. Journal of Second Language Writing 2007, 16:1-22.
5. Bhatia Vijay K. Integrating products, processes and participants in professional writing. Writing: Texts, Processes and Practices 1999, 21-39. Longman, London. C.N. Candlin, K. Hyland (Eds.).
6. Bhatia Vijay K. Analyzing genre: some conceptual issues. Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications 2006, 79-92. Continuum, London. M. Hewings (Ed.).
7. Bizzell Patricia Academic Discourse and Critical Consciousness 1992, University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh.
8. Bruce, Ian, 2003. Cognitive Genre Prototype Modeling and its Implications for the Teaching of Academic Writing to Learners of English as a Second Language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.
9. Cooper Marilyn M. The pragmatics of form: how do writers discover what to do?. New Directions in Composition Research 1984, 109-126. The Guildford Press, New York. R. Beach, S.L. Bridwell (Eds.).
10. Crismore Avon Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act 1989, Peter Lang Publishers, New York.
11. Crismore Avon, Raija Markkanen, Margaret Steffensen Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: a study of texts written by American and Finnish university students. Written Communication 1993, 10:39-71.
12. Dahl Trine Textual metadiscourse in research articles: a marker of national culture or of academic discipline?. Journal of Pragmatics 2004, 36(10):1807-1825.
13. Davies Bethan L. Grice's cooperative principle: meaning and rationality. Journal of Pragmatics 2007, 39(12):2308-2331.
14. Dudley-Evans Tony Genre analysis: an approach to text analysis for ESP. Advances in Written Text Analysis 1994, 219-229. Routledge, Newbury. M. Coulthard (Ed.).
15. Gee James Paul An Introduction to Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method 2005, Routledge, London. 2nd ed.
16. Grice Herbert Paul Logic and conversation. Speech Acts 1975, 45-58. Academic Press, New York. P. Cole, J. Morgan (Eds.).
17. Hall Alison Do discourse connectives encode concepts or procedures?. Lingua 2007, 117:149-174.
18. Hewings Martin Introduction. Academic Writing in Context: Implications and Applications 2006, 79-92. Continuum, London. M. Hewings (Ed.).
19. Hyland Ken Patterns of engagement: dialogic features and L2 student writing. Academic Writing in Context: Social-functional Perspectives on Theory and Practice 2004, Continuum, London. L. Ravelli, R. Ellis (Eds.).
20. Hyland Ken Metadiscourse: Exploring Interaction in Writing 2005, Continuum, London.
21. Hyland Ken Applying a gloss: exemplifying and reformulating in academic discourse. Applied Linguistics 2007, 28(2):266-285.
22. Hyland Ken, Hamp-Lyons Liz EAP: Issues and directions. Journal of English for Academic Purposes 2002, 1:1-12.
23. Ifantidou Elly The semantics and pragmatics of metadiscourse. Journal of Pragmatics 2005, 37(9):1325-1353.
24. Ilie Cornelia Who's afraid of Paul Grice? The role of the cooperative principle in academic metadiscourse. RASK 2002, 16:3-32.
25. Kaplan Robert B. Cultural thought pattern in intercultural communication. Journal of Language Learning 1966, 1:1-20.
26. Kumpf Eric P. Visual metadiscourse: designing the considerate text. Technical Communication Quarterly 2000, 9(4):401-424.
27. Lindblom Kenneth Cooperating with Grice: a cross-disciplinary metaperspective on uses of Grice's cooperative principle. Journal of Pragmatics 2001, 33(10):1601-1623.
28. Lovejoy Kim The Gricean model: a revising rubric. Journal of Teaching Writing 1987, 6:9-18.
29. Paltridge Brian Discourse Analysis 2006, Continuum, London.
30. Peterlin Agnes P. Text-organizing metatext in research articles: an English-Slovene contrastive analysis. English for Specific Purposes 2005, 24:307-319.
31. Riley Kathryn, Parker Frank Parallels between visual and textual processing. EEETPC 1998, 41:175-185.
32. Spencer-Oatey Helen, Jiang Wenying Explaining cross-cultural pragmatic findings: moving from politeness maxims to sociopragmatic interactional principles (SIPs). Journal of Pragmatics 2003, 35(10-11):1633-1650.
33. Swales John M. Citation analysis and discourse analysis. Applied Linguistics 1986, 7(1):39-56.
34. Swales John M. Genre Analysis: English for Specific Purpose in Academic and Research Setting 1990, Cambridge University Press, New York.
35. Thompson Geoff, Thetela Puleng The sound of one hand clapping: the management of interaction in written discourse. TEXT 1995, 15(1):103-127.
36. Vande Kopple William J. Some explanatory discourse on metadiscourse. College Composition and Communication 1985, 36:82-93.
37. van Dijk Teun A., Ting Toomy Stella, Smitherman Geneva, Troutman Denise Discourse, ethnicity, culture, and racism. Discourse as Social Action 1997, Sage Publications, London. T. Van Dijk (Ed.).
38. Vassileva Irena Commitment and detachment in English and Bulgarian academic writing. English for Specific Purposes 2001, 20:83-102.
39. Wilson Deirdre, Sperber Dan Relevance theory. Handbook of Pragmatics 2004, 607-632. Blackwell, Oxford. G. Ward, L.R. Horn (Eds.).