Visual metadiscourse: Designing the considerate text

Technical Communication Quarterly

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2000, Pages 401-424

  Kumpf, Eric P ^a  

^a BRADLEY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0011875377     PISSN: 10572252     EISSN: 15427625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10572250009364707     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Cheng, Xiaoguagn, and Steffensen, Margaret. 1996. “Metadiscourse: A Technique in Improving Student Writing.”. Research in the Teaching of English, 30: 149-81.
2. Crismore, Avon. 1984. “The Rhetoric of Textbooks: Metadiscourse. “. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 16.3: 279-96.
3. Crismore, Avon, Markkanen, Raija, and Steffensen, Margaret. 1993. “Metadiscourse in Persuasive Writing.”. Written Communication, 10: 39-71.
4. Crismore, Avon, Markkanen, Raija, and Steffensen, Margaret. 1990. “Metadiscourse in Popular and Professional Science Discourse.”. In The Writing Scholar: Studies in Academic Discourse., Edited by: Nash, Walter. 118-36. Newbury Park: Sage.
5. Dobrin, David. 1983. “What's Technical about Technical Writing?”. In New Essays in Technical and Scientific Communication: Research, Theory, Practice., Edited by: Anderson, Paul V., Brockmann, R. John, and Miller, Carolyn R., 227-50. Farmingdale, NY: Baywood.
6. Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 1984. Truth and Method., Edited by: Barden, Garrett, and dimming, John. New York: Crossroad.
7. Gill, Ann M., and Whedbee, Karen. 1997. “Rhetoric.”. In Discourse as Structure and Process., Edited by: van Dijk, Teun A., 157-84. London: Sage.
8. Grenz, Stanley J., 1996. A Primer on Postmodernism., Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.
9. Grice, H. P., 1989. “Logic and Conversation.”. In Studies in the Way of Words, 23-40. Cambridge: Harvard UP.
10. Harris, Joseph. 1989. “The Idea of Community in the Study of Writing.”. CCC, 40: 11-22.
11. Intaraprawat, Puangpen, and Steffensen, Margaret. 1995. “The Use of Metadiscourse in Good and Poor ESL Essays.”. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4: 253-72.
12. Kantor, R. N., Anderson, T. H., and Armbruster, B. B., 1983. “How Inconsiderate Are Children's Textbooks?”. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 15: 61-72.
13. Kostelnick, Charles. 1990. “The Rhetoric of Text Design in Professional Communication.”. The Technical Writing Teacher, 17: 189-202.
14. Kostelnick, Charles. 1996. “Supra-Textual Design: The Visual Rhetoric of Whole Documents.”. TCQ, 5: 9-33.
15. Kostelnick, Charles, and D. Roberts, David. 1998. Designing Visual Language: Strategies for Professional Communicators., Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
16. Kumpf, Eric P., and T. Emanuel, Joseph. 1996. ‘"Stepping Lively’: Reformatting the Gap between Student Writing and Professional Writing.”. TC, 43.2: 164-71.
17. Longo, Bernadette. 1993. “The Role of Metadiscourse in Persuasion.”. TC, 40.4: 348-52.
18. Lovejoy, Kim. 1987. “The Gricean Model: A Revising Rubric.”. Journal of Teaching Writing, 6.9: 9-18.
19. Mao, Luming R., 1993. “I Conclude Not: Toward a Pragmatic Account of Metadiscourse.”. Rhetoric Review, 11: 265-89.
20. Miller, Carolyn R., 1979. “A Humanistic Rationale for Teaching Technical Writing.”. College English, 40: 610-17.
21. Moore, Patrick, and Fitz, Chad. 1993. “Gestalt Theory and Instructional Design.”. JTWC, 23: 137-57.
22. Riley, Kathryn, and Parker, Frank. 1998. “Parallels between Visual and Textual Processing.”. IEEETPC, 41: 175-85.
23. Souther, James. 1962. “What Management Wants in the Technical Report.”. Journal of English Education, 52: 498-503.
24. Vande Kopple, William J., 1988. “Metadiscourse and the Recall of Modality Markers.”. Visible Language, 22: 233-72.
25. Vande Kopple, William J. 1985. “Some Exploratory Discourse on Metadiscourse.”. CCC, 36: 82-95.
26. Weiss, Edmond. 1982. The Writing System for Engineers and Scientists., Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice.
27. Williams, Joseph M., 1977. Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace., 5th ed., New York: Longman.