Biomechanical simulation of various surface roughnesses and geometric designs on an immediately loaded dental implant

Computers in Biology and Medicine

Volumn 40, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 525-532

  Huang, Heng Li ^a   Hsu, Jui Ting ^a   Fuh, Lih Jyh ^a   Lin, Dan Jae ^a   Chen, Michael Y C ^b  

^a CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b CHINA MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Bone stress (strain); Immediately loaded implant; Implant design; Sliding between implant and bone; Surface roughness

Indexed keywords

BIOMECHANICAL BEHAVIOR; BIOMECHANICAL SIMULATION; BONE MATERIALS; BONE SURFACE; BONE-IMPLANT INTERFACES; DENTAL IMPLANTS; FINITE ELEMENT MODELS; GEOMETRIC DESIGN; IMMEDIATELY LOADED IMPLANT; IMPLANT DESIGN; LATERAL FORCE; ROUGH SURFACES;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; CONCURRENT ENGINEERING; FINITE ELEMENT METHOD; IMPLANTS (SURGICAL); JOB ANALYSIS; METAL ANALYSIS; RAPID PROTOTYPING; SURFACE PROPERTIES; SURFACE ROUGHNESS;

DENTAL PROSTHESES;

ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BONE STRESS; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; EXPERIMENTAL MODEL; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MATERIALS TESTING; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; MECHANICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURFACE PROPERTY; SURFACE ROUGHNESS; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; VALIDATION PROCESS; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEVICE FAILURE ANALYSIS; HARDNESS; MANDIBLE; PHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; SURGERY; TOOTH IMPLANT; YOUNG MODULUS;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ELASTIC MODULUS; EQUIPMENT FAILURE ANALYSIS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; MANDIBLE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

TOOTH IMPLANT;

EID: 77952553088     PISSN: 00104825     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2010.03.008     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Babbush C.A., Kent J.N., Misiek D.A. Titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) screw implants for the reconstruction of the edentulous mandible. J. Oral Maxillofac. Surg. 1986, 44(4):274-282.
2. Szmukler-Moncler S., Piattelli A., Favero G.A., Dubruille J.H. Considerations preliminary to the application of early and immediate loading protocols in dental implantology. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2000, 11(1):12-25.
3. Misch C.E., Wang H.L., Misch C.H., Sharawy M., Lemons J., Judy K.W. Rationale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry: part II. Implant. Dent. 2004, 13(4):310-321.
4. Misch C.E., Wang H.L., Misch C.H., Sharawy M., Lemons J., Judy K.W. Rationale for the application of immediate load in implant dentistry: part I. Implant. Dent. 2004, 13(2):207-217.
5. Cochran D.L., Morton D., Weber H.P. Consensus statements and recommended clinical procedures regarding loading protocols for endosseous dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2004, 19(S):109-113.
6. Gapski R., Wang H.L., Mascarenhas P., Lang N.P. Critical review of immediate implant loading. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2003, 14(5):515-527.
7. Buser D., Schenk R.K., Steinemann S., Fiorellini J.E., Fox C.H., Stich H. Influence of surface characteristics on bone integration of titanium implants. A histomorphometric study in miniature pigs. J. Biomed. Mater. Res. 1991, 25(7):889-902.
8. Sykaras N., Iacopino A.M., Marker V.A., Triplett R.A., Woody R.G. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2000, 15(5):675-690.
9. Grant J.A., Bishop N.E., Gotzen N., Sprecher C., Honl M., Morlock M.M. Artificial composite bone as a model of human trabecular bone: the implant-bone interface. J. Biomech. 2007, 40(5):1158-1164.
10. Uribe R., Penarrocha M., Balaguer J., Fulgueiras N. Immediate loading in oral implants. Present situation. Med. Oral Patol. Oral Cir. Bucal. 2005, 10(S):E143-E153.
11. Maiorana C., Santoro F. Maxillary and mandibular bone reconstruction with hip grafts and implants using Frialit-2 implants. Int. J. Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002, 22(3):221-229.
12. Nentwig G.H. Ankylos implant system: concept and clinical application. J. Oral Implantol. 2004, 30(3):171-177.
13. Hansson S., Werke M. The implant thread as a retention element in cortical bone: the effect of thread size and thread profile: a finite element study. J. Biomech. 2003, 36(9):1247-1258.
14. Huang H.L., Chang C.H., Hsu J.T., Fallgatter A.M., Ko C.C. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2007, 22(4):551-562.
15. Liu Q., Leu M.C., Schmitt S.M. Rapid prototyping in dentistry: technology and application. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2006, 29:317-335.
16. Yamashita J., Shiozawa I., Takakuda K. A comparison of in vivo and in vitro strain with posterior fixed partial dentures. J. Prosthet. Dent. 1997, 77(3):250-255.
17. O'Mahony A.M., Williams J.L., Spencer P. Anisotropic elasticity of cortical and cancellous bone in the posterior mandible increases peri-implant stress and strain under oblique loading. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2001, 12(6):648-657.
18. Huang H.L., Hsu J.T., Fuh L.J., Tu M.G., Ko C.C., Shen Y.W. Bone stress and interfacial sliding analysis of implant designs on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a non-linear finite element study. J. Dent. 2008, 36(6):409-417.
19. Hashemi A., Shirazi-Adl A. Finite element analysis of tibial implants-effect of fixation design and friction model. Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Eng. 2000, 3(3):183-201.
20. Viceconti M., Muccini R., Bernakiewicz M., Baleani M., Cristofolini L. Large-sliding contact elements accurately predict levels of bone-implant micromotion relevant to osseointegration. J. Biomech. 2000, 33(2):1611-1618.
21. Hsu J.T., Chang C.H., Huang H.L., Zobitz M.E., Chen W.P., Lai K.A., An K.N. The number of screws, bone quality, and friction coefficient affect acetabular cup stability. Med. Eng. Phys. 2007, 29(10):1089-1095.
22. Akca K., Akkocaoglu M., Comert A., Tekdemir I., Cehreli M.C. Bone strains around immediately loaded implants supporting mandibular overdentures in human cadavers. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2007, 22(1):101-119.
23. Frost H.M. Perspectives: bone's mechanical usage windows. Bone. Miner. 1992, 19(3):257-271.
24. Jeffcoat M.K., McGlumphy E.A., Reddy M.S., Geurs N.C., Proskin H.M. A comparison of hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated threaded, HA-coated cylindric, and titanium threaded endosseous dental implants. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2003, 18(3):406-410.
25. Wheeler S. Use of the Frialit-2 implant system in private practice: a clinical report. Int. J. Oral Maxillofac. Implants 2003, 18(4):552-555.
26. Nkenke E., Fenner M. Indications for immediate loading of implants and implant success. Clin. Oral Implants Res. 2006, 17(s2):19-34.
27. Morris H.F., Ochi S., Crum P., Orenstein M.P.A.I.H., Winkler S. AICRG, part I: a 6-year multicentered, multidisciplinary clinical study of a new and innovative implant design. J. Oral Implantol. 2004, 30(3):125-133.