Rayleigh theory of ultrasound scattering applied to liquid-filled contrast nanoparticles

Physics in Medicine and Biology

Volumn 55, Issue 11, 2010, Pages 3061-3076

  Flegg, M B ^a   Poole, C M ^a   Whittaker, A K ^b   Keen, I ^b   Langton, C M ^a  

^a QUEENSLAND UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLOSED FORM SOLUTIONS; COMPOSITE NANOPARTICLES; CONTRAST AGENT; CORE MATERIAL; DIMENSIONAL PARAMETERS; IN-SHELL; LIQUID CORES; LOCAL MINIMUMS; PERFLUOROOCTYL BROMIDE; POLYMER SHELL; RAYLEIGH THEORY; SCATTERING CROSS SECTION; SOLID SHELLS; ULTRASOUND CONTRAST AGENT; ULTRASOUND SCATTERING;

COMPRESSIBILITY; COREMAKING; FILLED POLYMERS; LIQUIDS; NANOPARTICLES; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SHELLS (STRUCTURES); ULTRASONICS;

SCATTERING;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; FLUOROCARBON; NANOPARTICLE; PERFLUOROOCTYL BROMIDE; POLYCAPROLACTONE; POLYESTER; POLYMER;

ACOUSTICS; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; ECHOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; NANOTECHNOLOGY; RADIATION SCATTERING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICAL MODEL; ULTRASOUND;

ACOUSTICS; ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FLUOROCARBONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; NANOPARTICLES; NANOTECHNOLOGY; POLYESTERS; POLYMERS; SCATTERING, RADIATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; ULTRASONICS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 77952350769     PISSN: 00319155     EISSN: 13616560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/11/005     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Al Sahhaf T, Suttar Ahmed A and Elkamel A 2002 Producing ultralow interfacial tension at the oil/water interface Pet. Sci. Technol. 20 773-88
2. Allen J S, Kruse D E and Ferrara K W 2001 Shell waves and acoustic scattering from ultrasound contrast agents IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 48 409-18
3. André M, Nelson T and Mattrey R 1990 Physical and acoustical properties of perfluorooctylbromide, an ultrasound contrast agent Invest. Radiol. 25 983
4. Blomley M J K, Cooke J C, Unger E C, Monaghan M J and Cosgrove D O 2001 Microbubble contrast agents: a new era in ultrasound Br. Med. J. 322 1222
5. Chen W Q and Ding H J 1999 Natural frequencies of a fluid-filled anisotropic spherical shell J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105 174
6. Chouzouri G and Xanthos M 2007 In vitro bioactivity and degradation of polycaprolactone composites containing silicate fillers Acta Biomater. 3 745-56
7. Dayton P A and Ferrara K W 2002 Targeted imaging using ultrasound J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 16 362
8. Forsberg F and Shi W T 2001 Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications (London: Martin Dunitz)
9. Frinking P J A and De Jong N 1997 Modeling of ultrasound contrast agents IEEE Ultrasonics Symp. (1997) vol 2
10. Gaunaurd G C, Tanglis E, berall H and Brill D 1983 Interior and exterior resonances in acoustic scattering Il. Nuovo Cimento B 76 153-75
11. Gaunaurd G C and Werby M F 1986 Proper background choice in resonance scattering by elastic shells Int. J. Solids Struct. 22 1149-59
12. Gaunaurd G C and Werby M F 1991 Sound scattering by resonantly excited, fluid-loaded, elastic spherical shells J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 90 2536
13. Goldberg B B, Liu J B and Forsberg F 1994 Ultrasound contrast agents: a review Ultrasound Med. Biol. 20 319
14. Goldberg B B, Raichlen J S and Forsberg F 2001 Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications 2nd edn (London: Martin Dunitz)
15. Gramiak R and Shah P M 1968 Echocardiography of the aortic root Invest. Radiol. 3 356-66
16. Gramiak R, Shah P M and Kramer D H 1969 Ultrasound cardiography: contrast studies in anatomy and function Radiology 92 939-48
17. Hasheminejad S M and Maleki M 2008 Acoustic resonance scattering from a submerged anisotropic sphere Acoust. Phys. 54 168-79
18. Herzenberg A, Kwok K L and Mandl F 1964 Resonance scattering theory Proc. Phys. Soc. 84 477-97
19. Hoff L, Sontum P C and Hovem J M 2000 Oscillations of polymeric microbubbles: effect of the encapsulating shell J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 107 2272
20. Klibanov A L 1999 Targeted delivery of gas-filled microspheres, contrast agents for ultrasound imaging Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev. 37 139-57
21. Klibanov A L 2005 Ligand-carrying gas-filled microbubbles: ultrasound contrast agents for targeted molecular imaging Bioconjug. Chem. 16 9-17
22. Klibanov A L, Hughes M S, Marsh J N, Hall C S, Miller J G, Wible J H and Brandenburger G H 1997 Targeting of ultrasound contrast material. An in vitro feasibility study Acta Radiol. Suppl. 412 113
23. Kosobrodov R A 2002 Acoustic waves propagating in a fluid-filled spherical shell placed in a liquid Acoust. Phys. 48 309-20
24. Krafft M P, Chittofrati A and Riess J G 2003 Emulsions and microemulsions with a fluorocarbon phase Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 8 251-8
25. Lanza G M, Wallace K D, Scott M J, Cacheris W P, Abendschein D R, Christy D H, Sharkey A M, Miller J G, Gaffney P J and Wickline S A 1996 A novel site-targeted ultrasonic contrast agent with broad biomedical application Circulation 94 3334
26. Layre A, Couvreur P, Chacun H, Richard J, Passirani C, Requier D, Benoit J P and Gref R 2006 Novel composite core-shell nanoparticles as busulfan carriers J. Control. Release 111 271-80
27. Leighton T G 2007 Derivation of the Rayleigh-Plesset equation in terms of volume ISVR Technical Report No 308
28. Leong-Poi H, Christiansen J, Klibanov A L, Kaul S and Lindner J R 2003 Noninvasive assessment of angiogenesis by ultrasound and microbubbles targeted to alpha-v-integrins Circulation 107 455
29. Lindner J, Klibanov A and Ley K 2002 Biomedical Aspects of Drug Targeting ed V Muzykantov and V Torchilin (Boston, MA: Kluwer) pp 149-72
30. Lindner J R 2004 Microbubbles in medical imaging: current applications and future directions Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 3 527-33
31. Lindner J R, Song J, Xu F, Klibanov A L, Singbartl K, Ley K and Kaul S 2000 Noninvasive ultrasound imaging of inflammation using microbubble targeted to activated leukocytes Circulation 102 2745
32. Liu J B, Wansaicheong G, Merton D A, Forsberg F and Goldberg B B 2005 Contrast-enhanced ultrasound imaging: state of the art J. Med. Ultrasound 13 109-26
33. Liu J, Li J, Rosol T J, Pan X and Voorhees J L 2007 Biodegradable nanoparticles for targeted ultrasound imaging of breast cancer cells in vitro Phys. Med. Biol. 52 4739-48
34. Marsh J N, Hall C S, Scott M J, Fuhrhop R W, Gaffney P J, Wickline S A and Lanza G M 2002a Improvements in the ultrasonic contrast of targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles using an acoustic transmission line model IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 49 29-38
35. Marsh J N, Hall C S, Wickline S A and Lanza G M 2002b Temperature dependence of acoustic impedance for specific fluorocarbon liquids J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 112 2858-62
36. Marsh J N, Partlow K C, Abendschein D R, Scott M J, Lanza G M and Wickline S A 2007 Molecular imaging with targeted perfluorocarbon nanoparticles: quantification of the concentration dependence of contrast enhancement for binding to sparse cellular epitopes Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33 950-8
37. Marti McCulloch R, Cris Gresser R, Sally Moos R, Jill Odabashian R, Susan Jasper B S N, Jim Bednarz R, Pam Burgess R, Dennis Carney R, Vickie Moore R and Eric Sisk R 2000 Ultrasound contrast physics: a series on contrast echocardiography J. Am. Soc. Echocardiogr. 13 959-67
38. Mizushige K, Kondo I, Ohmori K, Hirao K and Matsuo H 1999 Enhancement of ultrasound-accelerated thrombolysis by echo contrast agents: dependence on microbubble structure Ultrasound Med. Biol. 25 1431-7
39. Morawski A M, Winter P M, Crowder K C, Caruthers S D, Fuhrhop R W, Scott M J, Robertson J D, Abendschein D R, Lanza G M and Wickline S A 2004 Targeted nanoparticles for quantitative imaging of sparse molecular epitopes with MRI Magn. Reson. Med. 51 480-6
40. Phillips D, Chen X, Baggs R, Rubens D, Violante M and Parker K J 1998 Acoustic backscatter properties of the particle/bubble ultrasound contrast agent Ultrasonics 36 883-92
41. Pisani E, Fattal E, Paris J, Ringard C, Rosilio V and Tsapis N 2008a Surfactant dependent morphology of polymeric capsules of perfluorooctyl bromide: influence of polymer adsorption at the dichloromethane-water interface J. Colloid Interface Sci. 326 66-71
42. Pisani E, Tsapis N, Galaz B, Santin M, Berti R, Taulier N, Kurtisovski E, Lucidarme O, Ourevitch M and Doan B T 2008b Perfluorooctyl bromide polymeric capsules as dual contrast agents for ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging Adv. Funct. Mater. 18 2963-71
43. Quaia E 2005 Contrast Media in Ultrasonography: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications (Berlin: Springer)
44. Ratner A V, Muller H H, Bradley-Simpson B, Johnson D E, Hurd R E, Sotak C and Young S W 1988 Detection of tumors with 19F magnetic resonance imaging Invest. Radiol. 23 361
45. Rayleigh L 1871 On the scattering of light by small particles Phil. Mag. 41 447-54
46. Reed A M and Gilding D K 1981 Biodegradable polymers for use in surgery-poly(glycolic)/poly(lactic acid) homo and copolymers Polymer 22 494-8
47. Riess J G 2003 Fluorocarbon-based injectable gaseous microbubbles for diagnosis and therapy Curr. Opin. Colloids Interface Sci. 8 259-66
48. Schumann P A, Christiansen J P, Quigley R M, McCreery T P, Sweitzer R H, Unger E C, Lindner J R and Matsunaga T O 2002 Targeted-microbubble binding selectively to GPIIb IIIa receptors of platelet thrombi Invest. Radiol. 37 587
49. Stanton T K, Chu D and Wiebe P H 1998 Sound scattering by several zooplankton groups: II. Scattering models J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 103 236
50. Stride E and Saffari N 2003 On the destruction of microbubble ultrasound contrast agents Ultrasound Med. Biol. 29 563-73
51. Strifors H C and Gaunaurd G C 1992 Differences in the acoustic echoes from submerged elastic shells containing different fluids Ultrasonics 30 107-12
52. Suh K S, Lee H J, Lee D S and Kang C G 1995 Charge distributions in PC/SAN/PCL polymer blends IEEE Trans. Dielectr. Electr. Insul. 2 460-6
53. Tran T A, Le Guennec J Y, Babuty D, Bougnoux P, Tranquart F and Bouakaz A 2009 On the mechanisms of ultrasound contrast agents-induced arrhythmias Ultrasound Med. Biol. 35 1050-6
54. Uberall H, George J, Farhan A R, Mezzorani G, Nagl A, Sage K A and Murphy J D 1979 Dynamics of acoustic resonance scattering from spherical targets: application to gas bubbles in fluids J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 66 1161
55. Villanueva F S, Jankowski R J, Klibanov S, Pina M L, Alber S M, Watkins S C, Brandenburger G H and Wagner W R 1998 Microbubbles targeted to intercellular adhesion molecule-1 bind to activated coronary artery endothelial cells Circulation 98 1-5
56. Wickline S A, Hughes M, Ngo F C, Hall C S, Marsh J N, Brown P A, Allen J S, McLean M D, Scott M J and Fuhrhop R W 2002 Blood contrast enhancement with a novel, non-gaseous nanoparticle contrast agent Acad. Radiol. 9 S290-3
57. Yamaguchi K and Anderson J M 1993 In vivo biocompatibility studies of medisorb 65/35 D,L-lactide/glycolide copolymer microspheres J. Control. Release 24 81-93
58. Yanagisawa K, Moriyasu F, Miyahara T, Yuki M and Iijima H 2007 Phagocytosis of ultrasound contrast agent microbubbles by Kupffer cells Ultrasound Med. Biol. 33 318-25
59. Ye Z 1996 On sound scattering and attenuation of Albunex bubbles J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 100 2011
60. Yeh C K and Su S Y 2008 Effects of acoustic insonation parameters on ultrasound contrast agent destruction Ultrasound Med. Biol. 34 1281-91
61. Zheng L J, Tu J and Chen W Z 2009 Modeling of ultrasound contrast agents bubble dynamics with modified surface tension coefficient Chin. Sci. Bull. 54 3501-7