Modeling of ultrasound contrast agents bubble dynamics with modified surface tension coefficient

Chinese Science Bulletin

Volumn 54, Issue 19, 2009, Pages 3501-3507

  Zheng, LuJie ^a   Tu, Juan ^a   Chen, WeiZhong ^a  

^a NANJING UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Dynamic model; Surface tension coefficient; Ultrasound contrast agents

Indexed keywords

EID: 70350591747     PISSN: 10016538     EISSN: 18619541     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11434-009-0431-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Chen Z, Xu J F, Huang W, et al. An experiment on multibubble sonoluminescence spectra in sodium chloride solution. Chinese Sci Bull, 2008, 53: 1468-1472.
2. Huang W, Chen W Z, Liu Y N, et al. Precise measurement technique for the stable acoustic cavitation bubble. Chinese Sci Bull, 2005, 50: 2417-2421.
3. Liang Y, Chen W Z, Xu X H, et al. Parametric dependence of the line emissions in sonoluminescence. Chinese Sci Bull, 2007, 52: 3313-3318.
4. Goldberg B B, Raichlen J S, Forsberg F. Ultrasound Contrast Agents: Basic Principles and Clinical Applications. 2nd ed. London: Martin Dunitz, 2001.
5. Gong Y J, Zhang D, Gong X F. Subharmonic and ultraharmonic emissions based on the nonlinear oscillation of encapsulated microbubbles in ultrasound contrast agents. Chinese Sci Bull, 2005, 50: 1975-1978.
6. Ma Q Y, Gong X F, Zhang D, et al. Investigation on phase-coded third harmonic imaging for normal and pathological tissues in transmission mode in vitro. Chinese Sci Bull, 2006, 51: 1180-1184.
7. Niu H J, Wang Q, Zheng Y P, et al. Extraction of elastic modulus of articular cartilage using four-parameters triphasic model and transient ultrasound method (in Chinese). Chinese Sci Bull (Chinese Ver), 2007, 52: 41-46.
8. Kennedy J E. High-intensity focused ultrasound in the treatment of solid tumours. Nature Rev Cancer, 2005; 5: 321-327.
9. Postema M, van Wamel A, Lancee C T, et al. Ultrasound-induced encapsulated microbubble phenomena. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2004, 30: 827-840.
10. Rayleigh L. On the pressure developed in a liquid during the collapse of a spherical cavity. Philos Mag, 1917, 34: 94-98.
11. Plesset M S. The dynamics of cavitation bubbles. J Appl Mech, 1949, 16: 277-282.
12. Allen J S, May D J, Ferrara K W. Dynamics of therapeutic ultrasound contrast agents. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28: 805-816.
13. Roy R A, Church C C, Calabrese A. Frontiers of nonlinear acoustics. In: Proceedings of the 12th ISNA. London: Elsevier, 1990. 476.
14. Church C C. The effects of an elastic solid surface layer on the radial pulsations of gas bubbles. J Acoust Soc Am, 1995, 97: 1510-1521.
15. Khismatullin D B, Nadim A. Radial oscillations of encapsulated microbubbles in viscoelastic liquids. Phys Fluids, 2002, 14: 3534-3557.
16. Marmottant P, van der Meer S, Emmer M, et al. A model for large amplitude oscillations of coated bubbles accounting for buckling and rupture. J Acoust Soc Am, 2005, 118: 3499-3505.
17. Doinikov A A, Dayton P A. Spatio-temporal dynamics of an encapsulated gas bubble in an ultrasound filed. J Acoust Soc Am, 2006, 120: 661-669.
18. Doinikov A A, Dayton P A. Maxwell rheological model for lipid-shelled ultrasound microbubble contrast agents. J Acoust Soc Am, 2007, 121: 3331-3340.
19. Guan J, Matula T J. Using light-scattering to measure the response of individual ultrasound contrast microbubbles subjected to pulsed ultrasound in vitro. J Acoust Soc Am, 2004, 116: 2832-2842.
20. de Jong N, Cornet R, Lancee C T. Higher harmonics of vibrating gas-filled microspheres I. Simulation. Ultrasonics, 1994, 32: 447-453.
21. Morgan K E, Allen J S, Dayton P A, et al. Experimental and theoretical evaluation of microbubble behavior: Effect of transmitted phase and bubble size. IEEE Trans Ultras Ferro Freq Contr, 2000, 47: 1494-1509.
22. Boal D. Mechanics of the Cell. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
23. Wu J R, Pepe J, Dewitt W. Nonlinear behaviors of contrast agents relevant to diagnostic and therapeutic applications. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2003, 29: 555-562.