Endosulfan and its metabolite, endosulfan sulfate, in freshwater ecosystems of South Florida: A probabilistic aquatic ecological risk assessment

Ecotoxicology

Volumn 19, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 879-900

  Rand, Gary M ^a   Carriger, John F ^a   Gardinali, Piero R ^a   Castro, Joffre ^b  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Everglades National Park   (United States)

Author keywords

endosulfan; endosulfan; Comprehensive Everglades Restoration Plan (CERP); Endosulfan; Endosulfan sulfate; Everglades National Park; Internal effect concentration; Organochlorines; Probabilistic aquatic ecological risk assessment; South Florida

Indexed keywords

ENDOSULFAN; ENDOSULFAN SULFATE; INSECTICIDE; SURFACE WATER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); ECOLOGICAL IMPACT; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENDOSULFAN; FRESHWATER ECOSYSTEM; METABOLITE; OXIDATION; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURFACE WATER; TOXICITY TEST; WATER POLLUTION; WATER QUALITY;

ANIMAL TISSUE; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ECOTOXICITY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; FRESHWATER ENVIRONMENT; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEDIMENT; SPECIES DISTRIBUTION; UNITED STATES; WATER QUALITY;

ANIMALS; BIRDS; ECOSYSTEM; ENDOSULFAN; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FISHES; FLORIDA; FRESH WATER; INSECTICIDES; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; UNITED STATES;

AVES; FUNDULUS CONFLUENTUS; GAMBUSIA AFFINIS; JORDANELLA;

EID: 77952238353     PISSN: 09639292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-010-0469-0     Document Type: Article

References (86)

1. Agency for Toxic Substances, Disease Registry (ATSDR) (2000) Toxicological profile for endosulfan. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Atlanta
2. Aldenberg T, Jaworska JS, Traas TP (2002) Normal species sensitivity distributions and probabilistic ecological risk assessment. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 49-102
3. MHG Berntssen CN Glover DHF Robb JV Jakobsen D Petri 2008 Accumulation and elimination kinetics of dietary endosulfan in Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) Aquat Toxicol 86 104 111 10.1016/j.aquatox.2007.10.006 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD1cXotlCmsA%3D%3D
4. JF Carriger GM Rand 2008 Aquatic risk assessment of pesticides in surface waters in and adjacent to the Everglades and Biscayne National Parks: I. Hazard assessment and problem formulation Ecotoxicol 17 660 679 10.1007/s10646-008- 0230-0 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFKju7zE
5. JF Carriger GM Rand 2008 Aquatic risk assessment of pesticides in surface waters in and adjacent to the Everglades and Biscayne National Parks: II. Probabilistic analyses Ecotoxicol 17 680 696 10.1007/s10646-008-0231-z 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtFKju7%2FE
6. JF Carriger GM Rand PR Gardinali WB Perry MS Tompkins AM Fernandez 2006 Pesticides of potential ecological concern in sediment from South Florida canals: an ecological risk prioritization for aquatic arthropods Soil Sediment Contam 15 21 45 10.1080/15320380500363095 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XmtF2qsQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 43958407)
7. PM Chapman RS Caldwell PF Chapman 1996 A warning: NOECs are inappropriate for regulatory use Environ Toxicol Chem 15 77 79 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XpsFynsg%3D%3D
8. WE Cotham TF Bidleman 1989 Degradation of malathion, endosulfan, and fenvalerate in seawater and seawater sediment microcosms J Agric Food Chem 37 824 828 10.1021/jf00087a055 1:CAS:528:DyaL1MXitVOnurg%3D
9. M Crane MC Newman 2000 What level of effect is a no observed effect? Environ Toxicol Chem 19 516 519 10.1002/etc.5620190234 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3cXhsF2hsb0%3D
10. De Zwart D (2002) Observed regularities in species sensitivity distributions for aquatic species. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 133-154
11. ECOFRAM (1999) Ecological committee on FIFRA risk assessment methods: report of the aquatic workgroup. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC
12. BI Escher JLM Hermens 2002 Modes of action in ecotoxicology: their role in body burdens, species sensitivity, QSARs, and mixture effects Environ Sci Technol 36 4201 4217 10.1021/es015848h 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XmvVGnsbs%3D
13. BI Escher JLM Hermens 2004 Internal exposure: linking bioavailability to effects Environ Sci Technol 38 6263 6270 10.1021/es0406740
14. RH Ffrench-Constant 1993 The molecular and population genetics of cyclodiene insecticide resistence Insect Biochem Mol Biol 24 335 345 10.1016/0965-1748(94)90026-4
15. RH Ffrench-Constant N Anthony K Aronstein T Rocheleau G Stilwell 2000 Cyclodiene insecticide resistance: from molecular to population genetics Annu Rev Entomol 48 449 466 10.1146/annurev.ento.45.1.449 (Pubitemid 30187869)
16. Florida Department of Agriculture, Consumer Services (FDACS) (2003) Summary of agricultural pesticide usage in Florida: 1999-2002. FDACS, Division of Agricultural Environmental Services, Bureau of Pesticides, Tallahassee
17. MH Fulton GI Scott ME DeLorenzo PB Key DW Bearden ED Strozier CJ Madden 2004 Surface water pesticide movement from the Dade County agricultural area to the Everglades and Florida Bay via the C-111 canal Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 73 527 534 10.1007/s00128-004-0461-6 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXns1equ78%3D (Pubitemid 39286945)
18. GAO (2007) Some restoration progress has been made, but the effort faces significant delays, implementation challenges, and rising costs. United States Government Accountability Office, GAO-07-1250T, Testimony Before the Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Democracy and Human Rights, Committee on Foreign Relations, U.S. Senate, Washington DC
19. German Federal Environment Agency (GFEA) (2007) Endosulfan: draft dossier prepared in support of a proposal of endosulfan to be considered as a candidate for inclusion in the Annexes to the Stockholm Convention. Umweltbundesamt
20. JM Giddings LW Hall KR Solomon 2000 Ecological risks of diazinon from agricultural use in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins, California Risk Anal 20 545 572 10.1111/0272-4332.205052 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3M7htVSnsw%3D%3D
21. Giddings JM, Hall LW, Anderson TA, Hosmer AJ, Kendall RJ (2005) Atrazine in North American surface waters: a probabilistic aquatic ecological risk assessment. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola
22. H Goebel S Gorbach W Knauf RH Rimpau H Huttenbach 1982 Properties, effects, residues, and analytics of the insecticide endosulfan Residue Rev 83 1 165 1:CAS:528:DyaL38XkvVKgs7o%3D
23. LR Goodman MA Lewis JM Macauley R Smith Jr JC Moore 1999 Preliminary survey of chemical contaminants in water, sediment, and aquatic biota at selected sites in Northeastern Florida Bay and canal C-111 Gulf Mex Sci 17 1 16
24. KL Gormley KL Teather 2003 Developmental, behavioral, and reproductive effects experienced by Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) in response to short-term exposure to endosulfan Ecotoxicol Environ Saf 54 330 338 10.1016/S0147-6513(02)00005-2 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXitVylsrc%3D (Pubitemid 36315871)
25. TF Guerin 2001 Abiological loss of endosulfan and related chlorinated organic compounds from aqueous systems in the presence and absence of oxygen Environ Pollut 115 219 230 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00112-9 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3MXmvVygs7g%3D (Pubitemid 32846618)
26. LW Hall P Gardinali 2004 Ecological risk assessment for Irgarol 1051 and its major metabolite in United States surface waters Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10 525 542 10.1080/10807030490452188 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXos1eku7g%3D (Pubitemid 38946977)
27. LW Hall MC Scott WD Killen 1998 Ecological risk assessment of copper and cadmium in surface waters of Chesapeake Bay watershed Environ Toxicol Chem 17 1172 1189 10.1002/etc.5620170626 1:CAS:528:DyaK1cXjsV2qsbo%3D
28. LW Hall RD Anderson J Kilian DP Tierney 1999 Concurrent exposure assessments of atrazine and metolachlor in the mainstem, major tributaries and small streams of the Chesapeake Bay watershed: indicators of ecological risk Environ Monit Assess 59 155 190 10.1023/A:1006188923956 1:CAS:528: DyaK1MXnslGjsro%3D (Pubitemid 29486344)
29. ML Hanson KR Solomon 2002 New technique for estimating thresholds of toxicity in ecological risk assessment Environ Sci Technol 36 3257 3264 10.1021/es011490d 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38XltVahtLg%3D (Pubitemid 34847593)
30. JA Harman-Fetcho CJ Hapeman LL McConnell TL Potter CP Rice AM Sadeghi RD Smith K Bialek KA Sefton BA Schaffer R Curry 2005 Pesticide occurrence in selected South Florida canals and Biscayne Bay during high agricultural activity J Agric Food Chem 53 6040 6048 10.1021/jf047803g 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXls1Ogtbw%3D (Pubitemid 41126644)
31. Hassall KA (1990) The biochemistry and uses of pesticides structure, metabolism, mode of action and uses in crop protection, 2nd edn. Macmillan Press Ltd, London
32. DA Holdway J Hefferman A Smith 2008 Multigeneration assessment of nonylphenol and endosulfan using a model Australian freshwater fish, Melanotaenia fluviatilis Environ Toxicol 23 253 262 10.1002/tox.20329 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXkt1Cmsbk%3D (Pubitemid 351458216)
33. GC Hose PJ Van den Brink 2004 Confirming the species-sensitivity distribution concept for endosulfan using laboratory, mesocosm, and field data Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 47 511 520 10.1007/s00244-003-3212-5 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXovVCmsL0%3D (Pubitemid 39506612)
34. IRAC (Insecticide Resistance Action Committee) (2007) IRAC mode of action classification version 5.3. www.irac-online.org
35. Jarvinen AW, Ankley GT (1999) Linkage of effects to tissue residues: development of a comprehensive database for aquatic organisms exposed to inorganic and organic chemicals. SETAC Technical Publication Series, SETAC Press. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Pensacola
36. Klepper O, van de Meent D (1997) Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as an indicator of generic toxic stress. RIVM report 607504 001. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven
37. V Laabs A Wehrhan A Pinto E Dores W Amelung 2007 Pesticide fate in tropical wetlands of Brazil: an aquatic microcosm study under semi-field conditions Chemosphere 67 975 989 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.10.067 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXhtVCms7k%3D (Pubitemid 46137988)
38. Latre B, Ramos MJ (2009) Draft initial detailed risk profile for endosulfan. Prepared for the European Commission, DG Environment, Stockholm Convention Secretariate. http://chm.pops.int/Convention/POPsReviewCommittee/ Meetings/POPRC4/AnnexEinformationrequest/tabid/437/language/en-US/Default.aspx. Accessed 17 April 2009
39. JA Ley CL Montague CC McIvor 1994 Food habits of mangrove fishes: a comparison along estuarine gradients in northeastern Florida Bay Bull Mar Sci 54 881 889
40. JJ Lorenz JE Serafy 2006 Subtropical wetland fish assemblages and changing salinity regimes: implications for Everglades restoration Hydrobiologia 569 401 422 10.1007/s10750-006-0145-9 (Pubitemid 44167588)
41. P Matthiessen PJ Fox RJ Douthwaite AB Wood 1982 Accumulation of endosulfan residues in fish and their predators after aerial spraying for the control of tsetse-fly in Botswana Pestic Sci 13 39 48 10.1002/ps.2780130107
42. LS McCarty D Mackay 1993 Enhancing ecotoxicological modeling and assessment: body residues and modes of toxic action Environ Sci Technol 27 1719 1728 10.1021/es00046a001
43. JP Meador 2006 Rationale and procedures for using the tissue-residue approach for toxicity assessment and determination of tissue, water, and sediment quality guidelines for aquatic organisms Hum Ecol Risk Assess 12 1018 1073 10.1080/10807030600801535 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXmvVSqtQ%3D%3D (Pubitemid 44639588)
44. JRW Miles P Moy 1979 Degradation of endosulfan and its metabolites by a mixed culture of soil-microorganisms Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 23 13 19 10.1007/BF01769908 1:CAS:528:DyaE1MXlvVOmsr4%3D
45. CJ Miles RJ Pfeuffer 1997 Pesticides in canals of South Florida Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 32 337 345 10.1007/s002449900194 1:CAS:528: DyaK2sXktlOjsrk%3D (Pubitemid 27287529)
46. DRJ Moore P-Y Caux 1997 Estimating low toxic effects Environ Toxicol Chem 16 794 801 10.1002/etc.5620160425 1:CAS:528:DyaK2sXis12ltbg%3D
47. National Research Council of Canada (NRCC) (1975) Endosulfan: its effects on environmental quality. NRCC publication no. 14098 (1975), NRC Associate Committee on Scientific Criteria for Environmental Quality, Subcommittee on Pesticides and Related Compounds, Ottawa
48. S Navarro A Barba JC Segura J Oliva 2000 Disappearance of endosulfan residues from seawater and sediment under laboratory conditions Pestic Manag Sci 56 849 854 10.1002/1526-4998(200010)56:10<849::AID-PS215>3.0.CO;2-1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXnt1yitro%3D
49. Newman MC (1995) Quantitative methods in aquatic ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton
50. MC Newman M Crane G Holloway 2006 Does pesticide risk assessment in the European Union assess long-term effects? Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 187 1 65 10.1007/0-387-32885-8-1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD28XlvF2hsrs%3D (Pubitemid 44489856)
51. F Pablo RV Hyne 2009 Endosulfan application to a stream mesocosm: studies on fate, uptake into passive samplers and caged toxicity test with the fish M. ambigua Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 56 525 535 10.1007/s00244-008-9251-1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXjsVWnurk%3D
52. Pait AS, DeSouza AE, Farrow DRG (1992) Agricultural pesticide use in coastal areas: a national summary. U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, Rockville
53. P Parkpian P Anurakpongsatorn P Pakkong WH Patrick 1998 Adsorption, desorption and degradation of alpha-endosulfan in tropical soils of Thailand J Environ Sci Health B-Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes 33 211 233
54. Schimmel SC, Patrick Jr JM, Wilson Jr AJ (1977) Acute toxicity to and bioconcentration of endosulfan by estuarine animals. In: Mayer FL, Hamelink JL (eds) Aquatic toxicology and hazard evaluation. American Society for Testing and Materials, USA, pp 241-252, ASTM STP 634
55. SM Peterson GE Batley 1993 The fate of endosulfan in aquatic ecosystems Environ Pollut 82 143 152 10.1016/0269-7491(93)90111-Z 1:CAS:528: DyaK3sXmtFSjsrw%3D
56. RJ Pfeuffer GM Rand 2004 South Florida ambient pesticide monitoring program Ecotoxicol 13 195 205 10.1023/B:ECTX.0000023565.91904.20 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjtVShu74%3D (Pubitemid 39012252)
57. GM Rand PR Gardinali 2004 South Florida ecosystems Ecotoxicol 13 179 184 10.1023/B:ECTX.0000023563.02344.5c 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXjtVShu7w%3D (Pubitemid 39012250)
58. LJ Schuler GM Rand 2008 Aquatic risk assessment of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems of South Florida Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54 571 583 10.1007/s00244-007-9085-2 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXkt12gur0%3D
59. Science Subgroup (1996) South Florida ecosystem restoration: scientific information needs. A Science Subgroup report to the Working Group of the South Florida Ecosystem Restoration Task Force, Miami
60. Scott GI, Fulton MH, Daugomah J, Strozier ED, Key PB, Pennington PL, Thompson BC, Wirth EF, Thayer G (1994) Monitoring of pesticides in surface waters of Florida Bay and adjacent agricultural watersheds: implications for future management of freshwater inputs to Florida Bay. U.S. National Marine Fisheries Service, Charleston
61. GI Scott MH Fulton EF Wirth GT Chandler PB Key JW Daugomah D Bearden KW Chung ED Strozier M DeLorenzo S Sivertsen A Dias M Sanders JM Macauley LR Goodman MW LaCroix GW Thayer J Kucklick 2002 Toxicological studies in tropical ecosystems: an ecotoxicological risk assessment of pesticide runoff in South Florida estuarine ecosystems J Agric Food Chem 50 4400 4408 10.1021/jf011356c 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xks12rsbw%3D (Pubitemid 34756046)
62. SETAC (Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry) (1994) Pesticide risk and mitigation. Final report of the Aquatic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Dialog Group. SETAC Foundation for Environmental Education, Pensacola
63. L Shen F Wania YD Lei C Teixeira DCG Muir TF Bidleman 2005 Atmospheric distribution and long-range transport behavior of organochlorine pesticides in North America Environ Sci Technol 39 409 420 10.1021/es049489c 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXhtVCmsbjL (Pubitemid 40129858)
64. HM Shivaramaiah F Sanchez-Bayo J Al-Rifai IR Kennedy 2005 The fate of endosulfan in water J Environ Sci Health B-Pestic Food Contam Agric Wastes 40 711 720 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2MrhslWjtA%3D%3D
65. KR Solomon DB Baker RP Richards DR Dixon SJ Klaine TW LaPoint RJ Kendall CP Weisskopf JM Giddings JP Giesy LW Hall WM Williams 1996 Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters Environ Toxicol Chem 15 31 74 10.1002/etc.5620150105 1:CAS:528:DyaK28XhvF2lsQ%3D%3D
66. K Solomon J Giesy P Jones 2000 Probabilistic risk assessment of agrochemicals in the environment Crop Prot 19 649 655 10.1016/S0261-2194(00) 00086-7
67. KR Solomon JM Giddings SJ Maund 2001 Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: I. Distributional analyses of laboratory aquatic toxicity data Environ Toxicol Chem 20 652 659 10.1002/etc.5620200326 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3MXjsFaqsbg%3D
68. DW Sparling GM Fellers 2009 Toxicity of two insecticides to California, USA, Anurans and its relevance to declining amphibian populations Environ Toxicol Chem 28 1696 1703 10.1897/08-336.1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1MXovFertrk%3D
69. TD Sutherland I Horne MJ Lacey RL Harcourt RJ Russell JG Oakeshott 2000 Enrichment of an endosulfan-degrading mixed bacterial culture Appl Environ Microbiol 66 2822 2828 10.1128/AEM.66.7.2822-2828.2000 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3cXkslKlsLk%3D (Pubitemid 30497587)
70. TD Sutherland I Horne KM Weir RJ Russell JG Oakeshott 2004 Toxicity and residues of endosulfan isomers Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 183 99 113 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXmsl2gtL8%3D
71. Systat (2008) SigmaPlot 11.0. Build 11.1.0.102. Systat Software, Inc., Chicago
72. Traas TP, van de Meent D, Posthuma L, Hamers T, Kater BJ, de Zwart D, Aldenberg T (2002) The potentially affected fraction as a measure of ecological risk. In: Posthuma L, Suter GW, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, FL, pp 315-344
73. U.S.EPA (1980) Ambient water quality criteria for endosulfan. EPA 440/5-80-046. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC
74. U.S.EPA (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC
75. U.S.EPA (2002) Environmental fate and ecological risk assessment for the reregistration eligibility decision on endosulfan (Thiodan ®). DP Barcode D238673. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Fate and Effects Division, Washington, DC
76. U.S.EPA (2007) Appendix 1 to 2007 addendum: environmental fate and ecological risk assessment of endosulfan. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC
77. Van de Plassche EJ, Canton JH, Eijs YA, Everts JW, Janssen PJCM, v. Koten-Vermeulen JEM, Polder MD, Posthumus R, de Stoppelaar JM (1994) Towards integrated environmental quality objectives for several compounds with a potential for secondary poisoning: Underlying data. Annex to Report no. 679101 012, National Institute of Public Health and Environmental Protection, Bilthoven
78. FAM Verdonck T Aldenberg J Jaworska PA Vanrolleghem 2003 Limitations of current risk characterization methods in probabilistic environmental risk assessment Environ Toxicol Chem 22 2209 2213 10.1897/02-435 1:CAS:528: DC%2BD3sXotF2gt7g%3D (Pubitemid 37337293)
79. SS Walse KD Shimizu JL Ferry 2002 Surface-catalyzed transformations of aqueous endosulfan Environ Sci Technol 36 4846 4853 10.1021/es0256257 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD38Xnsl2iu70%3D (Pubitemid 35364959)
80. SS Walse GI Scott JL Ferry 2003 Stereoselective degradation of aqueous endosulfan in modular estuarine mesocosms: Formation of endosulfan gamma-hydroxycarboxylate J Environ Monit 5 373 379 10.1039/b212165d 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXjvFKju7k%3D (Pubitemid 36724135)
81. MT Wan JN Kuo C Buday G Schroeder G Van Aggelen J Pasternak 2005 Toxicity of alpha-, beta-, (alpha plus beta)-endosulfan and their formulated and degradation products to Daphnia magna, Hyalella azteca, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Oncorhynchus kisutch, and biological implications in streams Environ Toxicol Chem 24 1146 1154 10.1897/04-300R1.1 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXjslantb0%3D (Pubitemid 40627935)
82. Wauchope RD, Buttler TM, Hornsby AG, Augustijn-Beckers PWM, Burt JP (1992) The SCS/ARS/CES pesticide properties database for environmental decision-making. Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 123:1-164
83. JB Willey PH Krone 2001 Effects of endosulfan and nonylphenol on the primordial germ cell population in pre-larval zebrafish embryos Aquat Toxicol 54 113 123 10.1016/S0166-445X(00)00178-8 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3MXltVakurw%3D (Pubitemid 32645677)
84. Y Yao T Harner P Blanchard L Tuduri D Waite L Poissant C Murphy W Belzer F Aulagnier E Sverko 2008 Pesticides in the atmosphere across Canadian agricultural regions Environ Sci Technol 42 5931 5937 10.1021/es800878r 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXosVejuro%3D
85. YA Zhao MC Newman 2004 Shortcomings of the laboratory-derived median lethal concentration for predicting mortality in field populations: exposure duration and latent mortality Environ Toxicol Chem 23 2147 2153 10.1897/03-557 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2cXms1GhsLg%3D (Pubitemid 39050073)
86. M Zhou YC Li P Nkedi-Kizza SK O'Hair 2003 Endosulfan losses through runoff and leaching from calcareous gravelly or marl soils Vadose Zone J 2 231 238 10.2113/2.2.231 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3sXltVWktLg%3D