Aquatic risk assessment of pesticides in surface waters in and adjacent to the Everglades and Biscayne National Parks: II. Probabilistic analyses

Ecotoxicology

Volumn 17, Issue 7, 2008, Pages 680-696

  Carriger, John F ^a   Rand, Gary M ^a  

^a FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Atrazine; Biscayne Bay; Biscayne National Park; C 111 canal; Chlorpyrifos; Ecological risk assessment; Endosulfan; Everglades National Park; Everglades restoration; Florida Bay; Malathion; Metolachlor

Indexed keywords

ATRAZINE; CHLORPYRIFOS; ENDOSULFAN; FRESH WATER; MALATHION; METOLACHLOR; PESTICIDE; SURFACE WATER;

ARTHROPOD; ECOTOXICOLOGY; FISH; INTERTIDAL ENVIRONMENT; PESTICIDE; POLLUTION EFFECT; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; PROBABILITY; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURFACE WATER;

ACUTE TOXICITY; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; AQUATIC SPECIES; ARTHROPOD; ARTICLE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ESTUARY; FISH; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NATIONAL PARK; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; WATER POLLUTION;

ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; FLORIDA; FRESH WATER; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PESTICIDES; RISK ASSESSMENT; UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL; WETLANDS;

BISCAYNE BAY; BISCAYNE NATIONAL PARK; EVERGLADES NATIONAL PARK; FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; FLORIDA BAY; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

ARTHROPODA;

EID: 52649086327     PISSN: 09639292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10646-008-0231-z     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. T Aldenberg W Slob 1993 Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data Ecotox Environ Saf 25 48 63
2. R Altenburger T Backhaus W Boedeker M Faust M Scholze LH Grimme 2000 Predictability of the toxicity of multiple chemical mixtures to Vibrio fischeri: mixtures composed of similarly acting chemicals Environ Toxicol Chem 19 2341 2347
3. T Backhaus R Altenburger W Boedeker M Faust M Scholze LH Grimme 2000 Predictability of the toxicity of multiple mixtures of dissimilarly acting chemicals to Vibrio fischeri Environ Toxicol Chem 19 2348 2356
4. Carriger JF, Rand GM Aquatic risk assessment of pesticides in surface waters in and adjacent to Everglades and Biscayne National Parks: I. Hazard assessment and problem formulation. Ecotoxicology (this issue)
5. JF Carriger GM Rand PR Gardinali WB Perry MS Tompkins AM Fernandez 2006 Pesticides of potential ecological concern in sediment from south Florida canals: an ecological risk prioritization for aquatic arthropods Soil Sediment Contam 15 21 45
6. Crommentuijn T, Kalf DF, Polder MD, Posthumus R, van de Plassche EJ (1997) Maximum permissible concentrations and negligible concentrations for pesticides. Report No. 601501 002, National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven, The Netherlands
7. BGE De March 1987 Simple similar action and independent joint action: two similar models for the joint effects of toxicants applied as mixtures Aquat Toxicol 9 291 304
8. JW Deneer TL Sinnige W Seinen JLM Hermens 1988 The joint acute toxicity to Daphnia magna of industrial organic chemicals at low concentrations Aquat Toxicol 12 33 38
9. W De Wolf JH Canton JW Deneer RCC Wegman JLM Hermens 1988 Quantitative structure-activity relationships and mixture-toxicity studies of alcohols and chlorohydrocarbons: reproducibility of effects on growth and reproduction of Daphnia magna Aquat Toxicol 12 39 49
10. De Zwart D (2002) Observed regularities in species sensitivity distributions for aquatic species. In: Posthuma L, Suter GWII, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 133-154
11. ECOFRAM (1999) Ecological committee on FIFRA risk assessment methods: report of the aquatic workgroup. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Pesticide Programs, Washington, DC
12. M Faust R Altenburger T Backhaus W Bödeker M Scholze LH Grimme 2000 Predictive assessment of the aquatic toxicity of multiple chemical mixtures J Environ Qual 29 1063 1068
13. JM Giddings LW Hall Jr KR Solomon 2000 Ecological risks of diazinon from agricultural use in the Sacramento-San Joaquin River Basins, California Risk Anal 20 545 572
14. Giddings JM, Anderson TA, Hall LW, Kendall RJ, Richards RP, Solomon KR, Williams WM (2000b) Aquatic ecological risk assessment of atrazine: a tiered probabilistic approach. A Report of an Expert Panel. Report nr 709-00. Novartis Crop Protection, Inc. Greensboro
15. JP Giesy KR Solomon JR Coats KR Dixon JM Giddings EE Kenaga 1999 Chlorpyrifos: ecological risk assessment in North American aquatic environments Rev Environ Contam Toxicol 160 1 129
16. LW Hall Jr RD Anderson 2003 Parametric and probabilistic analysis of historical chlorpyrifos surface water monitoring data from the San Joaquin river watershed: 1991-2001 Water Air Soil Pollut 150 275 298
17. LW Hall Jr PR Gardinali 2004 Ecological risk assessment for Irgarol 1051 and its major metabolite in United States waters Hum Ecol Risk Assess 10 525 542
18. LW Hall Jr MC Scott WD Killen MA Unger 2000 A probabilistic ecological risk assessment of tributyltin in surface waters of the Chesapeake Bay watershed Hum Ecol Risk Assess 6 141 179
19. Klepper O, van de Meent D (1997) Mapping the potentially affected fraction (PAF) of species as an indicator of generic toxic stress. RIVM report 607504 001. National Institute of Public Health and the Environment, Bilthoven
20. H Könemann 1981 Fish toxicity tests with mixtures of more than two chemicals: a proposal for a quantitative approach and experimental results Toxicology 19 229 238
21. CJ Miles RJ Pfeuffer 1997 Pesticides in canals of south Florida Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 32 337 345
22. Montague B (2002) EPA one-liners. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, Washington, DC
23. PA Pape-Lindstrom MJ Lydy 1997 Synergistic toxicity of atrazine and organophosphate insecticides contravenes the response addition mixture model Environ Toxicol Chem 16 2415 2420
24. RJ Pfeuffer GM Rand 2004 South Florida ambient pesticide monitoring program Ecotoxicology 13 195 205
25. RL Plackett PS Hewlett 1952 Quantal responses to mixtures of poisons J R Stat Soc B 14 141 163
26. LJ Schuler GM Rand 2008 Aquatic risk assessment of herbicides in freshwater ecosystems of south Florida Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 54 571 583
27. Scott GI et al (1990) Agricultural insecticide runoff effects on estuarine organisms: correlating laboratory and field toxicity testing with ecotoxicological biomonitoring. CR-813138-02-1. Southeast Fisheries Center. U.S. National Fisheries Service, Charleston, SC
28. SETAC (1994) Pesticide Risk and Mitigation: Final Report of the Aquatic Risk Assessment and Mitigation Dialogue Group. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Foundation for Environmental Education, Pensacola
29. KR Solomon DB Baker RP Richards KR Dixon SJ Klaine TW La Point RJ Kendall CP Weisskopf JM Giddings JP Giesy LW Hall Jr WM Williams 1996 Ecological risk assessment of atrazine in North American surface waters Environ Toxicol Chem 15 31 76
30. KR Solomon JM Giddings SJ Maund 2001 Probabilistic risk assessment of cotton pyrethroids: I. Distributional analyses of laboratory aquatic toxicity data Environ Toxicol Chem 20 652 659
31. S-Plus (1999) S-Plus 2000 professional release 2. MathSoft Inc., Lucent Technologies Inc.
32. Suter GWII, Traas TP, Posthuma L (2002) Issues and practices in the derivation and use of species sensitivity distributions. In: Posthuma L, Suter GWII, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 437-474
33. Traas TP, van de Meent D, Posthuma L, Hamers T, Kater BJ, de Zwart D, Aldenberg T (2002) The potentially affected fraction as a measure of ecological risk. In: Posthuma L, Suter GWII, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 315-344
34. U.S.EPA (1998) Guidelines for ecological risk assessment. EPA/630/R-95/002F. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water, Washington, DC
35. MT Wan J Kuo C Buday G Schroeder G Van Aggelen J Pasternak 2005 Toxicity of α-, β-, (α + β)-endosulfan and their formulated and degradation products to Daphnia magna, Hyalella azteca, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Oncorhynchus kisutch and biological implications in streams Environ Toxicol Chem 24 1146 1154
36. Warren-Hicks WJ, Parkhurst BR, Butcher JB (2002) Methodology for aquatic ecological risk assessment. In: Posthuma L, Suter GWII, Traas TP (eds) Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology. Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, pp 345-382
37. WHO (1984) Environmental health criteria 40: endosulfan. World Health Organization, International Programme on Chemical Safety, Geneva, Switzerland. http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc40.htm
38. J You LJ Schuler MJ Lydy 2004 Acute toxicity of sediment-sorbed endrin, methoxychlor, and endosulfan to Hyalella azteca and Chironomus tentans Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 73 457 464