Internal exposure: Linking bioavailability to effects

Environmental Science and Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 23, 2004, Pages

  Escher, Beate I ^a   Hermens, Joop L M ^b,c  

^a SWISS FEDERAL INSTITUTE OF AQUATIC SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Switzerland)

^b UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^c UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ECOTOXICOLOGICAL DATA; ENVIRONMENTAL RISK ASSESMENT; FISH;

DATA REDUCTION; HEALTH; RISK ASSESSMENT; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

POLLUTION;

BIOAVAILABILITY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; POLLUTION EXPOSURE; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICITY TEST;

BIOACCUMULATION; BIOAVAILABILITY; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); ECOTOXICITY; ECOTOXICOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT; HEALTH HAZARD; HUMAN; LC 50; PH; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICOKINETICS;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL AVAILABILITY; ECOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; RISK ASSESSMENT; TOXICOLOGY; WASTE MANAGEMENT;

EID: 9644281695     PISSN: 0013936X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (48)

1. Guidance Document for Aquatic Effects Assessment; Organization for Economic Co-Ordination and Development: Paris, France, 1995.
2. Mayer, P.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 2284-2290.
3. Brown, R.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2001, 35, 4097-4102.
4. Campbell, P. G. C. In Metal Speciation and Unavailability in Aquatic Systems; Tessier, A., Turner, D. R., Eds.; John Wiley: Chichester, U.K., 1995; pp 45-102.
5. Fosthuma, L.; Suter, G. W.; Traas, T. P. Species Sensitivity Distributions in Ecotoxicology; Lewis Fublishers: Boca Raton, FL, 2002.
6. van Wezel, A. P.; Opperhuizen, A. Crit. Rev. Toxicol. 1995, 25, 255-279.
7. Escher, B.; Schwarzenbach, R. P. Aquat. Sci. 2002, 64, 20-35.
8. Escher, B. I.; Hermens, J. L. M. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 4201-4217.
9. Suter, G. W.; et al. Hum. Ecol. Risk Assess. 2003, 9, 281-301.
10. Blaauboer, B. J. Environ. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2002, 11, 213-225.
11. Andersen, M. E. Toxicol. Lett. 2003, 138, 9-27.
12. Blaauboer, B. J.; et al. ATLA, Altern. Lab. Anim. 1996, 24, 473-497.
13. Gülden, M.; Morchel, S.; Seibeit, H. Toxicol. in Vitro 2001, 15, 233-243.
14. Seibert, H.; Morchel, S.; Gülden, M. Toxicol. in Vitro 2002, 16, 289-297.
15. Gülden, M.; Seibert, H. Toxicology 2003, 192, 265-265.
16. Vaes, W. H. J.; et al. Chem. Res. Toxicol. 1997, 10, 1067-1072.
17. Heringa, M. B.; Hermens, J. L. M. Trends Anal. Chem. 2003, 22, 575-587.
18. Heringa, M. B. et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 6263-6270.
19. Nagel, S. C.; et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 1997, 105, 70-76.
20. Nagel, S. C.; vom Saal, F. S.; Welshons, W.V. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 1998, 217, 300-309.
21. McCarty, L. S.; Mackay, D. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1993, 27, 1719-1728.
22. DiToro, D. M.; McGrath, J. A.; Hansen, D. J. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2000, 19, 1951-1970.
23. Jarvinen, A.; Ankley, G. Linkage of effects to tissue residues: development of a comprehensive database for aquatic organisms exposed to inorganic and organic chemicals; Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry: Pensacola, FL, 1999.
24. Landrum, P. F.; et al. Chemosphere 2003, 51, 481-489.
25. Paustenbach, D. J. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health, Part B 2000, 3, 179-291.
26. Vaes, W. H. M.; et al. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 1998, 17, 1380-1384.
27. Walter, H. Kombinationswirkungen von Umweltchemikalien: Zur Analyse der milieuabhängigen Mischungstoxizität von Kontaminanten mit unbekanntem Wirkmechanismus in umweltrelevanten Konzentrationen, Ph.D. Thesis, Martin-Luther Universität, Halle-Wittenberg, Germany, 2002, http://sundoc.bibliothek. uni-halle.de/diss-online/02/02A2277/t8.pdf.
28. Escher, B. I.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 560-570.
29. Küsel, A.; et al. Arch. Microbiol. 1990, 153, 254-258.
30. Escher, B. I.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 1971-1979.
31. Yang, R. S. H.; et al. Environ. Health Perspect. 1998, 6, 1385-1393.
32. Groten, J. P.; Feron, V. J.; Suhnel, J. Trends Pharmacol. Sci. 2001, 22, 316-322.
33. Eggen, R. I. L.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 59A-64A.
34. Legierse, K. C. H. M.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 917-925.
35. Verhaar, H. J. M.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1999, 33, 758-763.
36. Chaisuksant, Y.; Yu, Q. M.; Connell, D. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 1997, 37, 66-75.
37. Lee, J. H.; Landrum, P. W.; Koh, C. H. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 3131-3138.
38. Technical Guidance Document in Support of Commission Directive 93/67/EEC on Risk Assessment for New Notified Substances, Commission Regulation (EC) No. 1488/94 on Risk Assessment for Existing Substances, and Directive 98/8/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council Concerning the Placing of Biocidal Products on the Market; EUR 20418; European Commission, Office for Official Publications of the European Communities: Luxembourg, 2003; http://ecb.jrc.it.
39. Gobas, F. A. C. P.; et al. SETAC Globe 2001, 2 (4), 33-34.
40. Connell, D. W.; Chaisuksant, Y.; Yu, J. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 1999, 39, 54-61.
41. Maeder, V.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 3659-3666.
42. Schwarzenbach, R. P.; Gschwend, P. M.; Imboden, D. M. Environmental Organic Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Wiley: New York, 2003.
43. Kraaij, R.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 268-274.
44. Leslie, H. A.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2002, 36, 5399-5404.
45. Mayer, P.; et al. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2003, 37, 3A-9A.
46. Traas, T. P.; et al. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 2004, 23, 2518-2527.
47. Consultation Document concerning the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation, and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH); European Commission; 2003; http://europa.eu.int/comm/enterprise/reach/consultation.htm.
48. European Chemical Substances Information System (ESIS); European Chemical Bureau: Ispra, Italy, 2003; http://ecb.jrc.it.