The influence of technological knowledge base and organizational structure on technology collaboration

Journal of Management Studies

Volumn 47, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 679-704

  Zhang, Jing ^a   Baden Fuller, Charles ^b  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952050392     PISSN: 00222380     EISSN: 14676486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00885.x     Document Type: Article

References (118)

1. Ahuja G. The duality of collaboration: inducements and opportunities in the formation of interfirm linkages. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21:317-43.
2. Aiken L S, West S G. Multiple Regression: Testing and Interpreting Interactions 1991, Thousand Oaks, CA, Sage
3. Ambos T, Makela K, Birkinshaw J, D'Este P. When does university research get commercialised? Creating ambidexterity in research institutions. Journal of Management Studies 2008, 45:1424-47.
4. Argyres N S. Capabilities, technological diversification and divisionalization. Strategic Management Journal 1996, 17:395-410.
5. Argyres N S, Silverman B S. R&D, organization structure, and the development of corporate technological knowledge. Strategic Management Journal 2004, 25:929-58.
6. Arora A, Gambardella A. Complementarities and external linkages: the strategies of the large firms in biotechnology. The Journal of Industrial Economics 1990, 37:361-79.
7. Arora A, Gambardella A. Evaluating technological information and utilizing it: scientific knowledge, technological capability, and external linkages in biotechnology. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1994, 24:91-114.
8. Baden-Fuller C, Dean A, McNamara P, Hilliard B. Raising the returns to venture finance. Journal of Business Venturing 2006, 21:265-85.
9. Baum J A, Calabrese T, Silverman B. Don't go it alone: alliance network composition and startups' performance in Canadian biotechnology. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21:267-94.
10. Belderbos R, Carreeb M, Lokshin B. Cooperative R&D and firm performance. Research Policy 2004, 33:1477-92.
11. BIO's Editors' and Reporters' Guide to Biotechnology. 2004, http://www.bio.org, BIO, Biotechnology Industry Organization. Available at: (accessed 15 May 2005
12. Birkinshaw J, Nobel R, Ridderstrale J. Knowledge as a contingency variable: do the characteristics of knowledge predict organization structure. Organization Science 2002, 13:274-89.
13. Brusoni S, Prencipe A, Pavitt K. Knowledge specialization, organizational coupling, and the boundaries of the firm: why do firms know more than they make? Administrative Science Quarterly 2001, 46:597-621.
14. Cameron A C, Trivedi P K. Econometric models based on count data: comparisons and application of some estimators and tests. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1986, 1:29-53.
15. Cantwell J, Piscitello L. Accumulating technological competence: its changing impact on corporate diversification and internationalization. Industrial and Corporate Change 2000, 9:21-51.
16. Cantwell J, Piscitello L. Recent location of foreign-owned research and development activities by large multinational corporations in the European regions: the role of spillovers and externalities. Regional Studies 2005, 39:1-16.
17. Cassiman B, Veugelers R. In search of complementarity in the innovation strategy: internal R&D and external knowledge acquisition. Management Science 2006, 52:68-82.
18. Chacar A S, Lieberman M B. Organizing for technological innovation in the U.S. pharmaceutical industry. Advances in Strategic Management 2003, 20:299-322.
19. Chesbrough H W. Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology 2003, Boston, MA, Harvard Business Press
20. Cohen J, Cohen P. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences 1983, Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
21. Cohen W M, Levinthal D A. Absorptive capability: a new perspective on learning innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:128-52.
22. Collins H M. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice 1985, Beverley Hills/London, Sage
23. Colombo M G, Garrone P. Technological cooperative agreements and firm's R&D intensity: a note on causality relations. Research Policy 1996, 25:923-32.
24. Colombo M G, Grillia L, Piva E. In search of complementary assets: the determinants of alliance formation of high-tech start-ups. Research Policy 2006, 35:1166-99.
25. Conner K R, Prahalad C K. A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus opportunism. Organization Science 1996, 7:477-501.
26. Das T K, Teng B S. A resource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management 2000, 26:31-61.
27. De Carolis D M. Competencies and imitability in the pharmaceutical industry: an analysis of their relationship with firm performance. Journal of Management 2003, 29:27-50.
28. De Carolis D M, Deeds D. The impact of stocks and flows of organizational knowledge on firm performance: an empirical investigation of the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20:953-68.
29. Demain P. Building new alliances: drug company in strong position and bullish about investment in science. 2005, http://www.merck.com/licensing, Available at: (accessed 18 February 2006
30. Dhanaraj S, Lyles M A, Steensma K, Tihanyi L. Managing tacit and explicit knowledge transfer in IJVs: the role of relational embeddedness and the impact on performance. Journal of International Business Studies 2004, 35:428-42.
31. DiMaggio P J, Powell W W. The iron cage revisited: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review 1983, 48:147-60.
32. Dunning J H. Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy 1994, 23:67-88.
33. Dyer J H, Nobeoka K. Creating and managing a high performance knowledge-sharing network: the Toyota case. Strategic Management Journal 2000, 21:345-68.
34. Dyer J H, Singh H. The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of interorganizational competitive advantage. Academy of Management Review 1998, 23:660-79.
35. Edelson S, Brown S. Go figure. BioCentury: The Bernstein Report on BioBusiness 2005, 13:A19-23.
36. Eisenhardt K, Schoonhoven C B. Resource-based view of strategic alliance formation: strategic and social effects in entrepreneurial firms. Organization Science 1996, 7:136-50.
37. Ettlie J E, Pavlou P A. Technology-based new product development partnerships. Decision Science 2006, 37:117-47.
38. Foltz J, Barham B, Kim K. Universities and agricultural biotechnology patent production. Agribusiness 2000, 16:82-95.
39. Fredrickson J W. The strategic decision process and organizational structure. Academy of Management Review 1986, 11:280-97.
40. Fritsch M, Lukas R. Who cooperates on R&D? Research Policy 2001, 30:297-312.
41. Galunic D C, Eisenhardt K M. Architectural innovation and modular corporate forms. Academy of Management Journal 2001, 44:1229-50.
42. Gans J S, Hsu D H, Stern S. When does start-up innovation spur the gale of creative destruction? RAND Journal of Economics 2002, 33:71-86.
43. George G, Kotha R R, Zheng Y. Entry into insular domains: a longitudinal study of knowledge structuration and innovation in biotechnology firms. Journal of Management Studies 2008, 45:1448-74.
44. Gittelman M, Kogut B. Does good science lead to valuable knowledge? Biotechnology firms and the evolutionary logic of citation patterns. Management Science 2003, 49:366-82.
45. Grant R, Baden-Fuller C. A knowledge access theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management Studies 2004, 41:61-84.
46. Gulati R. Does familiarity breed trust? The implications of repeated ties for contractual choice in alliances. Academy of Management Journal 1995, 35:85-112.
47. Gupta A, Govindarajan V. Knowledge flows and the structure of controls within multinational corporations. Academy of Management Review 1991, 16:768-92.
48. Haan K. Whetting pharma's appetite. BioCentury: The Bernstein Report on BioBusiness 2004, 12:A7-9.
49. Hagedoorn J, Link A N, Vonortas N S. Research partnerships. Research Policy 2000, 29:567-86.
50. Hall B, Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M. The NBER Patent Citation Data File: Lessons, Insights, and Methodological Tools. 2001, Working Paper No. 8498, National Bureau of Economic Research
51. Hamel G. Competition for competence and inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 1991, 12:83-103.
52. Harrigan K R. Strategies for Joint Ventures 1985, Lexington, MA, Lexington Books
53. Heckman J, Borjas G. Does unemployment cause future unemployment? Economica 1980, 47:247-83.
54. Henderson R. The evolution of integrative capabilities: innovation in cardiovascular drug discovery. Industrial and Corporate Change 1994, 33:607-30.
55. Henderson R M, Clark K B. Architectural innovation: the reconfiguration of existing product technologies and the failure of established firms. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:930.
56. Henderson R, Cockburn I. Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research. Strategic Management Journal 1994, 15:63-84.
57. Higgins M J, Rodriguez D. The outsourcing of R&D through acquisitions in the pharmaceutical industry. Journal of Financial Economics 2006, 80:351-83.
58. Hopkins M M, Martin P A, Nightingale P, Kraft A, Mahdi S. The myth of the biotech revolution: an assessment of technological, clinical and organisational change. Research Policy 2007, 36:566-89.
59. Inkpen A C, Tsang E. Learning and strategic alliances. The Academy of Management Annals 2007, 1:479-511.
60. Inkpen A C, Wang P. An examination of collaboration and knowledge transfer: China-Singapore Suzhou Industrial Park. Journal of Management Studies 2006, 43:779-811.
61. Ireland R D, Hitt M A, Vaidyanath D. Alliance management as a source of competitive advantage. Journal of Management 2002, 28:413-46.
62. Jansen J, van den Bosch F, Volberda H. Managing potential and realized absorptive capacity: how do organizational antecedents matter. Academy of Management Journal 2005, 48:999-1015.
63. Katila R, Ahuja G. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45:1183-94.
64. Kauffman S, Lobo J, Macready W G. Optimal search on a technology landscape. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 2000, 43:141-66.
65. Kinder T. Go with the flow - a conceptual framework for supply relations in the era of the extended enterprise. Research Policy 2003, 32:503-23.
66. Kleinknecht A, Reijnen J O N. Why do firms cooperate on R&D? An empirical study. Research Policy 1992, 21:347-60.
67. Kogut B. Joint ventures and the option to expand and acquire. Management Science 1991, 37:19-33.
68. Kogut B, Zander U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology. Organization Science 1992, 3:383-97.
69. Koza M P, Lewin A Y. The co-evolution of strategic alliances. Organization Science 1998, 9:255-64.
70. Lane P J, Lubatkin M. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal 1998, 19:461-77.
71. Larsson R, Bengtsson L, Hendricksson K, Sparks J. The interorganizational learning dilemma: collective knowledge development in strategic alliances. Organization Science 1998, 9:285-96.
72. Laursen K, Salter A. Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among U.K. manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 2006, 27:131-50.
73. Lave J, Wenger E. Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation 1991, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press
74. March J G. Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organization Science 1991, 2:71-87.
75. McCullagh P, Nelder J. Generalized Linear Models 1989, New York, Chapman and Hall
76. McNamara P, Baden-Fuller C. Shareholder returns and the exploration-exploitation dilemma: R&D announcements by biotechnology firms. Research Policy 2007, 36:548-65.
77. Mitchell W, Singh K. " Incumbents" use of pre-entry alliances before expansion into new technical subfields of an industry. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1992, 18:347-72.
78. Mittra J. Life science innovation and the restructuring of the pharmaceutical industry: merger, acquisition and strategic alliance behaviour of large firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 2007, 19:279-301.
79. Mol M J. Does being R&D intensive still discourage outsourcing? Evidence from Dutch manufacturing. Research Policy 2005, 34:571-82.
80. Mowery D, Oxley J, Silverman B. Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer. Strategic Management Journal 1996, 30:77-92.
81. Myers S, Baker A. Drug discovery - an operating model for a new era. Nature Biotechnology 2001, 19:727-30.
82. Nielsen B B, Nielsen S. Learning and innovation in international strategic alliances: an empirical test of the role of trust and tacitness. Journal of Management Studies 2009, 46:1031-56.
83. Ohmae K. Managing in a borderless world. Harvard Business Review 1989, 67:152-61. May/June
84. Orsenigo L, Pammolli F, Riccaboni M. Technological change and network dynamics: lessons from the pharmaceutical industry. Research Policy 2001, 30:485-508.
85. Pangarkar N. Do firms learn from alliance terminations? An empirical examination. Journal of Management Studies 2009, 46:982-1004.
86. Park S H, Chen R, Gallagher S. Firm resources as moderators of the relationship between market growth and strategic alliances in semiconductor start-ups. Academy of Management Journal 2002, 45:527-45.
87. Patel P, Pavitt K. Large firms in the production of the world's technology: an important case of " non-globalisation" Journal of International Business Studies 1991, 22:1-21.
88. Perry-Smith J E, Shalley C E. The social side of creativity: a static and dynamic social network perspective. Academy of Management Review 2003, 28:89-107.
89. Pisano G P. The R&D boundaries of the firm: an empirical analysis. Administrative Science Quarterly 1990, 35:153-76.
90. Piscitello L. Relatedness and coherence in technological and product diversification of the world's largest firms. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 2000, 11:295-315.
91. Piscitello L. Corporate diversification, coherence and economic performance. Industrial and Corporate Change 2004, 13:757-87.
92. Porac J F, Thomas H, Baden-Fuller C. Competitive groups as cognitive communities: the case of Scottish knitwear manufacturers. Journal of Management Studies 1989, 26:397-416.
93. Porter M E, Fuller M B. Coalitions and global strategy. Competition in Global Industries 1986, 315-44. Porter M E, In, Ed., Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press
94. Powell W W, Brantley P. Competitive cooperation in biotechnology: learning through networks. Networks and Organizations: Structure, Form and Action 1992, 366-94. Nahria N, Eccles R. In, Eds, Boston, MA, Harvard Business School Press
95. Powell W W, Koput K W, Smith-Doerr L. Interorganizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly 1996, 41:116-45.
96. Quinn J B. Outsourcing innovation: the new engine of growth. Sloan Management Review 2000, 41:13-28.
97. Reuer J J, Tong T W. Real options in international joint ventures. Journal of Management 2005, 31:403-23.
98. Ritter J R. The " hot issue" market of 1980. Journal of Business 1984, 57:215-41.
99. Rothaermel F. Incumbent's advantage through exploring complementary assets via interfirm cooperation. Strategic Management Journal 2001, 22:687-99.
100. Rothaermel F, Boeker W. Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal 2007, 29:47-77.
101. Rothaermel F, Deeds D. Exploration and exploitation alliances in biotechnology: a system of new product development. Strategic Management Journal 2004, 25:201-21.
102. Rothaermel F, Deeds D L. Alliance type, alliance experience and alliance management capability in high-technology ventures. Journal of Management 2006, 21:429-60.
103. Shan W, Walker G, Kogut B. Interfirm cooperation and startup innovation in the biotechnology industry. Strategic Management Journal 1994, 15:387-94.
104. Siggelkow N, Levinthal D A. Temporarily divide to conquer: centralized, decentralized, and reintegrated organizational approaches to exploration and adaptation. Organization Science 2003, 14:650-69.
105. Siggelkow N, Rivkin J W. Speed and search: designing organizations for turbulence and complexity. Organization Science 2005, 16:101-22.
106. Simonin B L. Ambiguity and the process of knowledge transfer in strategic alliances. Strategic Management Journal 1999, 20:595-623.
107. Soete L. The impact of technological innovation on international trade patterns: the evidence reconsidered. Research Policy 1987, 16:101-30.
108. Stuart T. Network positions and propensities to collaborate: an investigation of alliances formation in a high-technology industry. Administrative Science Quarterly 1998, 43:668-98.
109. Teece D J. Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing, and public policy. Research Policy 1986, 15:285-305.
110. Tether B S. Who co-operates for innovation, and why: an empirical analysis. Research Policy 2002, 31:947-67.
111. Tsang E. Transaction cost and resource-based explanations of joint ventures: a comparison and synthesis. Organization Science 2000, 21:215-42.
112. Volberda H W. Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organization Science 1996, 7:359-74.
113. Walker R. Patents as Scientific and Technical Literature 1995, Metuchen, NJ, Scarecrow Press
114. Walker G, Kogut B, Shan W. Social capital, structural holes and the formation of an industry network. Organization Science 1997, 8:109-25.
115. Wang Q, von Tunzelmann G N. Complexity and the functions of the firm: breadth and depth. Research Policy 2000, 29:805-18.
116. Williamson O E. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism 1985, New York, Free Press
117. Zhang J, Baden-Fuller C, Mangematin V. Technological knowledge base, R&D organization structure and alliance formation: evidence from the biopharmaceutical industry. Research Policy 2007, 36:515-28.
118. Zucker L G, Darby M R, Armstrong J S. Commercializing knowledge: university science, knowledge capture, and firm performance in biotechnology. Management Science 2002, 48:138-53.