Evaluating secondary students' scientific reasoning in genetics using a two-tier diagnostic instrument

International Journal of Science Education

Volumn 32, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1073-1098

  Tsui, Chi Yan ^a   Treagust, David ^a  

^a CURTIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Alternative conception; Biology education; Evaluation; Genetics; Reasoning; Secondary school

Indexed keywords

EID: 77952031089     PISSN: 09500693     EISSN: 14645289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09500690902951429     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Anderson, C. W. (2007). Perspective in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 3-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Bahar, M., Johnstone, A. H., & Hansell, M. H. (1999). Revisiting learning difficulties in biology. Journal of Biological Education, 33(2), 84-86.
3. Balc, S., Cakiroglu, J., & Tekkaya, C. (2006). Engagement, exploration, explanation, extension, and evaluation (5E) learning cycle and conceptual change text as learning tools. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 34(3), 199-203.
4. Castera, J., Bruguiere, C., & Clement, P. (2008). Genetic diseases and genetic determinism models in French secondary school biology textbooks. Journal of Biological Education, 42(2), 53-59.
5. Chandrasegaran, A. L., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). An evaluation of a teaching intervention to promote students' ability to use multiple levels of representation when describing and explaining chemical reactions. Research in Science Education, 38 237-248.
6. Chiu, M.-H., Guo, C.-J., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Assessing students' conceptual understanding in science: An introduction about a national project in Taiwan. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 379-390.
7. Concord Consortium. (2001, October). BioLogica. Retrieved October 8, 2001, from http://biologica.concord.org
8. Concord Consortium. (2002, October). BioLogica teachers' guide. Retrieved June, 2002, from http://mac.concord.org/downloads/
9. Curriculum Council. (1998). Curriculum framework for kindergarten to year 12 in Western Australia. Perth: Curriculum Council of Western Australia.
10. Duncun, R. G., & Reiser, B. J. (2007). Reasoning across ontologically distinct levels: Students' understanding of molecular genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(7), 938-959.
11. Erickson, F. (1998). Qualitative research methods for science education. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 1115-1173). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
12. Gallagher, J. J. (Ed.). (1991). Interpretive research in science education (Vol. 4). Manhattan, KS: National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), Kansas State University.
13. Griffard, P. B., & Wandersee, J. H. (2001). The two-tier instrument on photosynthesis: What does it diagnose? International Journal of Science Education, 23(20), 1039-1052.
14. Hackling, M. W. (1981). Secondary students' understanding of inheritance concepts and propositions. Unpublished Master's thesis, Western Australia Institute of Technology, Perth.
15. Hackling, M. W., & Lawrence, A. J. (1988). Expert and novice solutions of genetic pedigree problems. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25(7), 531-546.
16. Hackling, M. W., & Treagust, D. F. (1984). Research data necessary for meaningful review of grade ten high school genetics curricula. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(1), 197-209.
17. Hewson, P. W. (1981). A conceptual change approach to learning science. European Journal of Science Education, 3(4), 383-396.
18. Hewson, P. W., Beeth, M. E., & Thorley, N. R. (1998). Teaching for conceptual change. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 199-218). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Hickey, D. T., Wolfe, E. W., & Kindfield, A. C. H. (2000). Assessing learning in a technologysupported genetics environment: Evidential and systemic validity issues. Educational Assessment, 6(3), 155-196.
20. Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1983). Mental models: Towards a cognitive science of language, inferences, and consciousness. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
21. Johnstone, A. H. (1991). Why is science difficult to learn? Things are seldom what they seem. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 7, 75-83.
22. Kindfield, A. C. H., & Hickey, D. T. (1999, April 19-23). Tools for scaffolding inquiry into the domain of introductory genetics. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
23. Kinnear, J. (1992, March). Teaching genetics: Recommendations and research. Paper presented at the Teaching Genetics: Recommendations and Research Proceedings of a National Conference, Cambridge, MA.
24. Koballa Jr, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 75-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
25. Lawson, A. E. (1992). What do tests of "formal" reasoning actually measure? Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(9), 965-983.
26. Lawson, A. E. (1994). Research on the acquisition of science knowledge: Epistemological foundations of cognition. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 131-176). New York: MacMillan.
27. Madden, D. (2005). Time for a genetic switch. Journal of Biological Education, 39(3), 100-101.
28. Mader, S. S. (2009). Concepts of biology (9th ed.). New York: McGraw Hill Higher Education.
29. Marbach-Ad, G., & Stavy, R. (2000). Students' cellular and molecular explanations of genetic phenomena. Journal of Biological Education, 34(4), 200-205.
30. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
31. Millar, R., & Hames, V. (2006). Using research to clarify learning goals and measure outcomes. In R. Millar, J. Leach, J. Osborne, & M. Ratcliffe (Eds.), Improving subject teaching (pp. 44-59). London/New York: Routledge.
32. Moore, J. M., Mertens, T. R., Hendrix, J. R., & Henriksen, L. W. (1992). Can using human examples facilitate learning Mendelian genetics concepts? School Science and Mathematics, 92(5), 273-277.
33. Odom, A. L., & Barrow, L. H. (1995). Development and application of a two-tier diagnostic test measuring college biology students' understanding of diffusion and osmosis after a course of instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32(1), 45-61.
34. Pearson, J. T., & Hughes, W. J. (1988a). Problems with the use of terminology in genetics education: 1. A literature review and classification scheme. Journal of Biological Education, 22(3), 178-182.
35. Pearson, J. T., & Hughes, W. J. (1988b). Problems with the use of terminology in genetics education: 2. Some examples from published materials and suggestions for rectifying the problem. Journal of Biological Education, 22(4), 267-274.
36. Posner, G. J., Strike, K. A., Hewson, P. W., & Gertzog, W. A. (1982). Accommodation of a scientific conception: Toward a theory of conceptual change. Science Education, 66(2), 211-227.
37. Scott, P., Asoko, H., & Leach, J. (2007). Student conceptions and conceptual learning in science. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 31-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
38. Stewart, J. H. (1982). Difficulties experienced by high school students when learning basic Mendelian genetics. American Biology Teacher, 44(2), 80-84, 89.
39. Tan, K. C. D., Goh, N. K., Chia, L. S., & Treagust, D. F. (2002). Development and application of a two-tier multiple choice diagnostic instrument to assess high school students' understanding of inorganic chemistry qualitative analysis. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 39(4), 283-301.
40. Treagust, D. F. (1988). Development and use of diagnostic tests to evaluate students' misconception in science. International Journal of Science Education, 10(2), 159-169.
41. Treagust, D. F., & Chandrasegaran, A. L. (2007). The Taiwan National Science Concept Learning Study in an international perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 391-403.
42. Tsai, C.-H., Chen, H.-Y., Chou, C.-Y., & Lain, K.-D. (2007). Current as the key concept of Taiwanese students' understandings of electric circuits. International Journal of Science Education, 29(4), 483-496.
43. Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2002, April). Social/affective dimension in learning genetics with multiple representations in secondary biology. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching (NARST), New Orleans, LA.
44. Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2003). Genetics reasoning with multiple external representations. Research in Science Education, 33(1), 111-135.
45. Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2004a). Conceptual change in learning genetics: An ontological perspective. Research in Science and Technology Education, 22(2), 185-202.
46. Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2004b). Motivational aspects of learning genetics with interactive multimedia. American Biology Teacher, 66(4), 277-286.
47. Tsui, C.-Y., & Treagust, D. F. (2007). Understanding genetics: Analysis of secondary students' conceptual status. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(2), 205-235.
48. Tyson, L. M., Venville, G. J., Harrison, A. L., & Treagust, D. F. (1997). A multidimensional framework for interpreting conceptual change events in the classroom. Science Education, 81, 387-404.
49. van Someren, M. W., Reimann, P., Boshuizen, H. P. A., & de Jong, T. (Eds.). (1998). Learning with multiple representations. London: Pergamon.
50. Venville, G. J., & Donovan, J. (2005). Searching for clarity to teach the complexity of the gene concept. Teaching Science, 51(3), 20-24.
51. Venville, G. J., & Treagust, D. F. (1998). Exploring conceptual change in genetics using a multidimensional interpretive framework. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 1031-1055.
52. White, R., & Gunstone, R. (1992). Probing understanding. London: Palmer Press.
53. Wood, R. (1996). From my DNA to Darwin: Learning and teaching in genetics. Unpublished DPhil thesis, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand.