Numerical investigations on the biomechanical compatibility of hip-joint endoprostheses

Archive of Applied Mechanics

Volumn 80, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 503-512

  Lutz, André ^a   Nackenhorst, Udo ^a  

^a LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Finite element method; Hip joint endoprosthetics; Stress adaptive bone remodeling

Indexed keywords

BEST FIT; BIOMECHANICAL COMPATIBILITY; BONE MASS; BONE REMODELING; CLINICAL STUDY; COMPUTATIONAL APPROACH; COMPUTATIONAL PREDICTIONS; COMPUTATIONAL RESULTS; DEVELOPMENT PROCESS; ENDOPROSTHESES; HIP IMPLANTS; JOINT LOADS; MODEL GENERATION; MODELING APPROACH; MUSCLE FORCE; NUMERICAL INVESTIGATIONS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; THREE DIMENSIONAL FINITE ELEMENT MODEL;

BIOMECHANICS; BONE; THREE DIMENSIONAL;

FINITE ELEMENT METHOD;

EID: 77952010123     PISSN: 09391533     EISSN: 14320681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00419-009-0380-4     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Wolff J.: Das Gesetz der Transformationder Knochen. Hirschwald, Berlin (1892)
2. Pauwels F.: Atlas zur Biomechanik der gesunden und kranken Hüfte. Springer, Berlin (1973)
3. D.R. Carter T.E. Orr D.P. Fyhrie 1989 Relationship between loading history and femoral cancellous bone architechture J. Biomech. 22 231 244 10.1016/0021-9290(89)90091-2 (Pubitemid 19102191)
4. G.S. Beaupre T.E. Orr D.R. Carter 1990 An approach for time-dependent bone modeling and remodeling-theoretical development J. Orthop. Res. 8 651 661 10.1002/jor.1100080506
5. G.S. Beaupre T.E. Orr D.R. Carter 1990 An approach for time-dependent bone modelling and remodelling: a preliminary remodeling simulation J. Orthop. Res. 8 662 670 10.1002/jor.1100080507
6. H. Weinans R. Huiskes H.J. Grootenboer 1992 The behavior of adaptive bone remodeling simulation models J. Biomech. 25 1425 1441 10.1016/0021-9290(92) 90056-7
7. U. Nackenhorst 1997 Numerical simulation of stress stimulated bone remodeling Technische Mechanik 17 31 40
8. C.R. Jacobs M.E. Levenston G.S. Beaupre J.C. Simo D.R. Carter 1995 Numerical instabilities in bone-remodeling simulations: the advantage of a node-based finite element approach J. Biomech. 28 449 459 10.1016/0021-9290(94) 00087-K
9. C.R. Jacobs J.C. Simo G.S. Beaupre D.R. Carter 1997 Adaptive bone remodeling incorporating simultaneous density and anisotropy considerations J. Biomech. 30 603 613 10.1016/S0021-9290(96)00189-3 (Pubitemid 27214192)
10. N. Krstin U. Nackenhorst R. Lammering 2000 Zur konstitutiven Beschreibung des anisotropen beanspruchungsadaptiven Knochenumbaus Technische Mechanik 20 31 40
11. M. Doblare J.M. Garcia 2002 Anisotropic bone remodelling model based on a continuum damage-repair theory J. Biomech. 35 1 17 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00178- 6 (Pubitemid 34017346)
12. E. Kuhl A. Menzel P. Steinmann 2003 Computational modeling of growth-A critical review, a classification of concepts and two new consistent approaches Comput. Mech. 32 71 88 1151.74385 10.1007/s00466-003-0463-y
13. S.C. Cowin D.H. Hegedus 1976 Bone remodeling. I. Theory of adaptive elasticity J. Elast. 6 313 326 0335.73028 10.1007/BF00041724 489170
14. Cowin S.C.: Bone Mechanics Handbook. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2001)
15. R.B. Martin 2002 Is all cortical bone remodeling initiated by microdamage? Bone 30 8 13 10.1016/S8756-3282(01)00620-2 (Pubitemid 34044295)
16. L. You S.C. Cowin M.B. Schaffler S. Weinbaum 2001 A model for strain amplification in the actin cytoskeleton of osteocytes due to fluid drag on pericellular matrix J. Biomech. 34 1375 1386 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00107-5 (Pubitemid 32970752)
17. L.A. MacGinitie G.D. Stanley W.A. Bieber D.D. Wu 1997 Bone streaming potentials and currents depend on anatomical structure and loading orientation J. Biomech. 30 1133 1139 10.1016/S0021-9290(97)85605-9 (Pubitemid 28032472)
18. G. Bergmann G. Deuretzbacher M. Heller F. Graichen A. Rohlmann J. Strauss G.N. Duda 2001 Hip contact forces and gaint pattern from routine activities J. Biomech. 34 859 871 10.1016/S0021-9290(01)00040-9 (Pubitemid 32530054)
19. M.O. Heller G. Bergmann J.P. Kassi L. Claes N.P. Haas G.N. Duda 2005 Determination of muscle loading at the hip joint for use in pre-clinical testing J. Biomech. 38 1155 1163 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2004.05.022 (Pubitemid 40439206)
20. G. Duda M. Heller G. Bergmann 2005 Musculosceletal loading database: loading conditions of the proximal femur Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 6 287 292 10.1080/14639220412331329609
21. Lemaitre J., Chaboche J.-L.: Mechanics of Solid Materials. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)
22. Simo J.C., Hughes T.J.R.: Computational Inelasticity. Springer, Berlin (1998)
23. Wriggers P.: Nonlinear Finite Element Methods. Springer, Berlin (2008)
24. D.R. Carter W.C. Hayes 1977 The behavior of bone as a two-phase porous structure J. Bone Joint Surg. 59 954 962
25. F. Linde P. Norgaard I. Hvid A. Odgaard K. Soballe 1991 Mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependency on strain rate J. Biomech. 24 803 809 10.1016/0021-9290(91)90305-7
26. D. Cody F.J. Hou G.W. Divine D.P. Fyhrie 2000 Short term in vivo precision of proximal femoral finite element modeling Ann. Biomed. Eng. 28 408 414 10.1114/1.278
27. J.H. Keyak Y. Falkinstein 2003 Comparison of in situ and in vitro CT scan-based finite element model predictions of proximal femoral fracture load Med. Eng. Phys. 25 781 787 10.1016/S1350-4533(03)00081-X (Pubitemid 39089844)
28. S.M. Snyder E. Schneider 1991 Estimation of mechanical properties of cortical bone by computed tomography J. Orthop. Res. 9 422 431 10.1002/jor.1100090315
29. D.C. Wirtz N. Schiffers T. Pandorf K. Radermacher D. Weichert R. Forst 2000 Critical evaluation of known bone material properties to realize anisotropic FE-simulation of the proximal femur J. Biomech. 33 1325 1330 10.1016/S0021-9290(00)00069-5 (Pubitemid 30427330)
30. J.Y. Rho M.C. Hobatho R.B. Ashman 1995 Relations of mechanical properties to density and CT numbers in human bone Med. Eng. Phys. 17 347 355 10.1016/1350-4533(95)97314-F
31. R.L. Austmann J.S. Milner D.W. Holdsworth C.E. Dunning 2008 The effect on the density-modulus relationship selected to apply material properties in a finite element model of long bone J. Biomech. 41 3171 3176 10.1016/j.jbiomech. 2008.08.017
32. J.C. Rice S.C. Cowin J.A. Bowman 1988 On the dependence of elasticity and strength of cancellous bone on apparent density J. Biomech. 21 155 168 10.1016/0021-9290(88)90008-5 (Pubitemid 18037418)
33. L. Peng J. Bai X. Zeng Y. Zhou 2006 Comparison of isotropic and orthotropic material property assignments on femoral finite element models under two loading conditions Med. Eng. Phys. 28 227 233 10.1016/j.medengphy.2005.06. 003 (Pubitemid 43176699)
34. V. Baca Z. Horak P. Mikulenka V. Dzupa 2008 Comparison of an inhomogeneous orthotropic and isotropic material models used for FE analyses Med. Eng. Phys. 30 924 930 10.1016/j.medengphy.2007.12.009
35. O.C. Zienkiewicz J.Z. Zhu 1992 The superconvergence patch recovery and a posteriori error estimates. Part I. The recovery techniques Int. J. Numer. Methods Eng. 33 1331 1364 0769.73084 10.1002/nme.1620330702 1161557
36. H. Weinans R. Huiskes B. Verdonschot N. Van Rietbergen 1991 The effect of adaptive bone remodeling threshold levels on resoprtion around noncemented hip stems Adv. Bioeng. 20 303 306
37. National Library of Medicine. Visible Human Project. 08 July 2009. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/visible/visible-human.html
38. Z. Yosibash R. Padan L. Joskowicz C. Milgrom 2007 A CT-based high-order finite element analysis of the human proximal femur compared to in vitro experiments J. Biomech. Eng. 129 297 309 10.1115/1.2720906 (Pubitemid 47066843)
39. K.J. Fischer C.R. Jacobs D.R. Carter 1995 Computational method for determination of bone and joints loads using bone density distributions J. Biomech. 28 1127 1135 10.1016/0021-9290(94)00182-4
40. B. Ebbecke U. Nackenhorst 2005 Simulation of stress adaptive bone remodeling J. Struct. Mech. 38 177 180
41. A. Roth G. Richartz K. Sander A. Sachse R. Fuhrmann A. Wagner R.A. Venbrocks 2005 Verlauf der periprothetischen Knochendichte nach Hüfttotalendoprothesenimplantation Orthopäde 34 334 344 10.1007/s00132-005-0773-1 (Pubitemid 40718740)
42. B.F. Morrey R.A. Adams M. Kessler 2000 A conservative femoral replacement for total hip arthroplasty-a prospective study J. Bone Joint Surg. 82 952 958 10.1302/0301-620X.82B7.10420
43. K. Zweymüller F. Lintner M. Semlitsch 1988 Biologic fixation of a press-fit titanium hip joint endoprosthesis Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 235 195 206
44. H. Effenberger T. Ramsauer G. Böm G. Hilzensauer U. Dorn F. Lintner 2001 Successful hip arthroplasty using cementless titanium implants in rheumatoid arthritis Arch. Orthop. Trauma Surg. 122 80 87 10.1007/s004020100320
45. Hanebeck, J.: Postoperative Knochendichteänderungen am Femur nach Implantation der zementfreien Zweymüller-Hüftendoprothese unter Berücksichtigung klinischer und röntgenologischer Parameter. PhD Thesis, Humbold Universität Berlin (2001)
46. R. Zwartele A. Peters J. Brouwers P. Olsthoorn R. Brand C. Doets 2008 Long-term results of cementless primary total hip arthroplasty with a threaded cup and a tapered, rectangular titanium stem in rheumatoid arthritis and osteoarthritis Int. Orthop. 32 581 587 10.1007/s00264-007-0383-0
47. J. Daniel P.B. Pynsent D.J. McMinn 2004 Metal-on-metal resurfacing of the hip in patients under the age of 55 years with osteoarthritis J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 86 177 184 10.1302/0301-620X.86B2.14600 (Pubitemid 38386853)
48. F. Falez F. Favetti F. Casella G. Panegrossi 2007 Hip resurfacing: why does it fail? Early results and critical analysis of our first 60 cases Int. Orthop. 32 209 216 10.1007/s00264-006-0313-6
49. M. Lavigne M. Kalhor M. Beck R. Ganz M. Leunig 2005 Distribution of vascular foramina around the femoral head and neck junction: relevance for conservative intracapsular procedures of the hip Orthop. Clin. North Am. 36 171 176 10.1016/j.ocl.2005.02.002
50. C.P. Little A.L. Ruiz I.J. Harding P. McLardy-Smith R. Gundle D.W. Murray N.A. Athanasou 2005 Osteonecrosis in retrieved femoral heads after failed resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 87 320 323 10.2106/JBJS.D.02927 (Pubitemid 41546374)