Audiovisual bounce-inducing effect: When sound congruence affects grouping in vision

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 72, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 378-386

  Grassi, Massimo ^a   Casco, Clara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEARING; HUMAN; LEARNING; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION DISORDER; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; TIME PERCEPTION;

ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; ORIENTATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PERCEPTUAL DISTORTION; PSYCHOPHYSICS; REACTION TIME; SET (PSYCHOLOGY); SPACE PERCEPTION; TIME PERCEPTION;

EID: 77951917588     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/APP.72.2.378     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Ballas, J. A. (1993). Common factors in the identification of an assortment of brief everyday sounds. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 250-267. doi:10.1037/h0090367
2. Beauchamp, M. S., Argall, B. D., Bodurka, J., Duyn, J. H., & Martin, A. (2004). Unraveling multisensory integration: Patchy organization within human STS multisensory cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 7, 1190-1192. doi:10.1038/nn1333
3. Beauchamp, M. S., Lee, K. E., Argall, B. D., & Martin, A. (2004). Integration of auditory and visual information about objects in superior temporal sulcus. Neuron, 41, 809-823. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(04)00070-4
4. Bertelson, P., & Aschersleben, G. (1998). Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 482-489.
5. Bertenthal, B. I., Banton, T., & Bradbury, A. (1993). Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns. Perception, 22, 193-207. doi:10.1068/p220193
6. Brainard, D. H. (1997). The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision, 10, 433-436.
7. Dufour, A., Touzalin, P., Moessinger, M., Brochard, R., & Despres, O. (2008). Visual motion disambiguation by a subliminal sound. Consciousness & Cognition, 17, 790-797. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2007.09.001
8. Ernst, M. O., & Banks, M. S. (2002). Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature, 415, 429-433. doi:10.1038/415429a
9. Fastl, H., & Zwicker, E. (2006). Psychoacoustics: Facts and models (3rd ed.). New York: Springer.
10. Gaver, W. W. (1993a). How do we hear the world? Explanations in ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology, 5, 285-313. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0504_2
11. Gaver, W. W. (1993b). What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology, 5, 1-29. doi:10.1207/s15326969eco0501_1
12. Gottfried, J. A., & Dolan, R. J. (2003). The nose smells what the eye sees: Crossmodal visual facilitation of human olfactory perception. Neuron, 39, 375-386. doi:10.1016/S0896-6273(03)00392-1
13. Grassi, M., & Casco, C. (2009). Audiovisual bounce-inducing effect: Attention alone does not explain why the discs are bouncing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 35, 235-243. doi:10.1037/a0013031
14. Gray, P. (2002). Psychology (4th ed.). New York: Worth.
15. Green, D. M., & Swets, J. A. (1966). Signal detection theory and psychophysics. New York: Wiley.
16. Grove, P. M., & Sakurai, K. (2009). Auditory induced bounce perception persists as the probability of a motion reversal is reduced. Perception, 38, 951-965. doi:10.1068/p5860
17. Gygi, B., Kidd, G. R., & Watson, C. S. (2004). Spectral-temporal factors in the identification of environmental sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 115, 1252-1265. doi:10.1121/1.1635840
18. Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., & Alter, K. (2004). Pre-attentive perception of vowel phonemes from variable speech stimuli. Psychophysiology, 41, 654-659. doi:10.1111/1469-8986.2004.00175.x
19. Jacobsen, T., Schröger, E., & Sussman, E. (2004). Pre-attentive categorization of vowel formant structure in complex tones. Cognitive Brain Research, 20, 473-479. doi:10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2004.03.021
20. Jonides, J. (1981). Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye movement. In J. [B.] Long & A. [D.] Baddeley (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 187-203). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Kawabe, T., & Miura, K. (2006). Effects of the orientation of moving objects on the perception of streaming/bouncing motion displays. Perception & Psychophysics, 68, 750-758.
22. Kawachi, Y., & Gyoba, J. (2006). Presentation of a visual nearby moving object alters stream/bounce event perception. Perception, 35, 1289-1294. doi:10.1068/p5594
23. Koffka, K. (1935). Gestalt psychology. New York: Harcourt Brace.
24. Laurienti, P. J., Kraft, R. A., Maldjian, J. A., Burdette, J. H., & Wallace, M. T. (2004). Semantic congruence is a critical factor in multisensory behavioral performance. Experimental Brain Research, 158, 405-414. doi:10.1007/s00221-004-1913-2
25. Marr, D. (1982). Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual information. New York: Freeman.
26. Metzger, W. (1934). Beobachtungen über phänomenale Identität. Psychologische Forschung, 19, 1-60. doi:10.1007/BF02409733
27. Molholm, S., Ritter, W., Javitt, D. C., & Foxe, J. J. (2004). Multisensory visual-auditory object recognition in humans: A high-density electrical mapping study. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 452-465. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh007
28. Murray, M. M., Camen, C., Gonzalez Andino, S. L., Bovet, P., & Clarke, S. (2006). Rapid brain discrimination of sounds of objects. Journal of Neuroscience, 26, 1293-1302. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4511-05.2006
29. Parovel, G., & Casco, C. (2006). The psychophysical law of speed estimation in Michotte's causal events. Vision Research, 46, 4134-4142. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.08.005
30. Pelli, D. G. (1997). The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision, 10, 437-442.
31. Remijn, G. B., & Ito, H. (2007). Perceptual completion in a dynamic scene: An investigation with an ambiguous motion paradigm. Vision Research, 47, 1869-1879. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.03.017
32. Remijn, G. B., Ito, H., & Nakajiama, Y. (2004). Audiovisual integration: An investigation of the "streaming-bouncing" phenomenon. Journal of Physiological Anthropology & Applied Human Science, 23, 243-247. doi:10.2114/jpa.23.243
33. Robinson, K. L., & Patterson, R. D. (1995a). The duration required to identify the instrument, the octave, or the pitch-chroma of a musical note. Music Perception, 13, 1-15.
34. Robinson, K. L., & Patterson, R. D. (1995b). The stimulus duration required to identify vowels, their octave, and their pitch chroma. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 1858-1865. doi:10.1121/1.414405
35. Sekuler, A. B., & Sekuler, R. (1999). Collisions between moving visual targets: What controls alternative ways of seeing an ambiguous display? Perception, 28, 415-432. doi:10.1068/p2909
36. Sekuler, R., Sekuler, A. B., & Lau, R. (1997). Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature, 385, 308. doi:10.1038/385308a0
37. Tervaniemi, M., Winkler, I., & Näätänen, R. (1997). Pre-attentive categorization of sounds by timbre as revealed by event-related potentials. NeuroReport, 8, 2571-2574.
38. Watanabe, K., & Shimojo, S. (1998). Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events. Perception, 27, 1041-1054. doi:10.1068/p271041
39. Watanabe, K., & Shimojo, S. (2001a). Postcoincidence trajectory duration affects motion event perception. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 16-28.
40. Watanabe, K., & Shimojo, S. (2001b). When sound affects vision: Effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception. Psychological Science, 12, 109-116. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00319
41. Watanabe, K., & Shimojo, S. (2005). Crossmodal attention in event perception. In L. Itti, G. Rees, & J. K. Tsotsos (Eds.), Neurobiology of attention (pp. 538-546). San Diego: Elsevier.
42. Wertheimer, M. (1923). Untersuchungen zur Lehre von der Gestalt: II. Psychologische Forschung, 4, 301-350. doi:10.1007/BF00410640
43. Zhou, F., Wong, V., & Sekuler, R. (2007). Multi-sensory integration of spatio-temporal segmentation cues: One plus one does not always equal two. Experimental Brain Research, 180, 641-654. doi:10.1007/s00221-007-0897-0.