Audiovisual Bounce-Inducing Effect: Attention Alone Does Not Explain Why the Discs Are Bouncing

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance

Volumn 35, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 235-243

  Grassi, Massimo ^a   Casco, Clara ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

audiovisual perception; crossmodal perception

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; DEPTH PERCEPTION; HEARING; HUMAN; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NOISE; REACTION TIME; VISION;

ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; NOISE; REACTION TIME; SPACE PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 60349112309     PISSN: 00961523     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/a0013031     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Bertelson P., and Aschersleben G. Automatic visual bias of perceived auditory location. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 5 (1998) 482-489
2. Berthenthal B.I., Banton T., and Bradbury A. Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns. Perception 22 (1993) 193-207
3. Brainard D.H. The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 433-436
4. Calvert G., Spence C., and Stein B.E. The handbook of multisensory processes (2004), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
5. DiGiovanni J.J., and Schlauch R.S. Mechanisms responsible for differences in perceived duration for rising-intensity and falling-intensity sounds. Ecological Psychology 19 (2007) 239-264
6. Ernst M.O., and Banks M.S. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415 (2002) 429-433
7. Gaver W.W. How do we hear the world? Explanations in ecological acoustics. Ecological Psychology 5 (1993) 285-313
8. Gaver W.W. What in the world do we hear? An ecological approach to auditory event perception. Ecological Psychology 5 (1993) 1-29
9. Grassi M., and Darwin C.J. The subjective duration of ramped and damped sounds. Perception & Psychophysics 68 (2006) 1382-1392
10. Heil P. Auditory onset response revisited: I. First-spike timing. Journal of Neurophysiology 78 (1997) 2616-2641
11. Heil P. Auditory onset response revisited: II. Response strength. Journal of Neurophysiology 78 (1997) 2642-2660
12. Jonides J. Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye movement. In: Long J.B., and Baddeley A.D. (Eds). Attention and performance IX (1981), Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 187-203
13. Kawabe T., and Miura K. Effects of the orientation of moving objects on the perception of streaming/bouncing motion display. Perception & Psychophysics 68 (2006) 750-758
14. Kawachi Y., and Gyoba J. Presentation of a visual nearby moving object alters stream/bounce event perception. Perception 35 (2006) 1289-1294
15. Kawachi Y., Kawabe T., and Gyoba J. Temporal window of colour-motion binding in the stream/bounce event perception. Perception 36 (2007) (ECVP Abstract Suppl.)
16. Lippert M., Logothetis N.K., and Kayser C. Improvement of visual contrast detection by a simultaneous sound. Brain Research 1173 (2007) 102-109
17. McBeath M.K., and Neuhoff J.G. The Doppler effect is not what you think it is: Dramatic pitch change due to dynamic intensity change. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002) 306-313
18. Metzger W. Beobachtungen über phänomenale Identität. Psychologische Forschung 19 (1934) 1-60
19. Neuhoff J.G. Perceptual bias for rising tones. Nature 395 (1998) 123-124
20. Neuhoff J.G. An adaptive bias in the perception of looming auditory motion. Ecological Psychology 13 (2001) 87-110
21. Neuhoff J.G., and McBeath M.K. The Doppler illusion: The influence of dynamic intensity change on perceived pitch. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 22 (1996) 970-985
22. Pelli D.G. The VideoToolbox software for visual psychophysics: Transforming numbers into movies. Spatial Vision 10 (1997) 437-442
23. Remijn G.B., and Ito H. Perceptual completion in a dynamic scene: An investigation with an ambiguous motion paradigm. Vision Research 47 (2007) 1869-1879
24. Remijn G.B., Ito H., and Nakajiama Y. Audiovisual integration: An investigation of the "streaming-bouncing" phenomenon. Journal of Physiological Anthropology and Applied Human Science 23 (2004) 243-247
25. Schlauch R.S., Ries D.T., and DiGiovanni J.J. Duration discrimination and subjective duration for ramped and damped sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 109 (2001) 2880-2887
26. Sekuler A.B., and Sekuler R. Collisions between moving visual targets: What controls alternative ways of seeing an ambiguous display?. Perception 28 (1999) 415-432
27. Sekuler R., Sekuler A.B., and Lau R. Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385 (1997) 308
28. Stecker G.C., and Hafter E.R. An effect of temporal asymmetry in loudness. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 107 (2000) 3358-3368
29. Vroomen J., and de Gelder B. Sound enhances visual perception. Cross-modal effects of auditory organization in vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26 (2000) 1583-1590
30. Watanabe, K. (2001). Crossmodal interaction in humans. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena.
31. Watanabe K., and Shimojo S. Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events. Perception 27 (1998) 1041-1054
32. Watanabe K., and Shimojo S. Postcoincidence trajectory duration affects motion event perception. Perception & Psychophysics 63 (2001) 16-28
33. Watanabe K., and Shimojo S. When sound affects vision: Effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 109-116
34. Westheimer G. Discrimination of short time intervals by the human observer. Experimental Brain Research 129 (1999) 121-126
35. Zhou F., Wong V., and Sekuler R. Multi-sensory integration of spatio-temporal segmentation cues: One plus one does not always equal two. Experimental Brain Research 180 (2007) 641-654