Perceptual completion in a dynamic scene: An investigation with an ambiguous motion paradigm

Vision Research

Volumn 47, Issue 14, 2007, Pages 1869-1879

  Remijn, Gerard B ^a   Ito, Hiroyuki ^a  

^a KYUSHU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Motion; Occlusion; Perceptual completion; Streaming bouncing

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; LUMINANCE; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STIMULUS RESPONSE; VISIBILITY; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

ADULT; CONTRAST SENSITIVITY; CUES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTION; MOTION PERCEPTION; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOPHYSICS;

EID: 34249663841     PISSN: 00426989     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.visres.2007.03.017     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Alvarez G.A., Horowitz T.S., Arsenio H.C., Dimase J.S., and Wolfe J.M. Do multielement visual tracking and visual search draw continuously on the same visual attention resources?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 31 (2005) 643-667
2. Assad J.A., and Maunsell J.H. Neuronal correlates of inferred motion in primate posterior parietal cortex. Nature 373 (1995) 518-521
3. Avidan G., Harel M., Hendler T., Ben-Bashat D., Zohary E., and Malach R. Contrast sensitivity in human visual areas and its relationship to object recognition. Journal of Neurophysiology 87 (2002) 3102-3116
4. Behrmann M., Zemel R.S., and Mozer M.C. Object-based attention and occlusion evidence from normal participants and a computational model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 24 (1998) 1011-1036
5. Bertenthal B.I., Banton T., and Bradbury A. Directional bias in the perception of translating patterns. Perception 22 (1993) 193-207
6. Burns N.R., and Zanker J.M. Streaming and bouncing: Observations on motion defined objects. Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology 28 (2000) 220-222
7. Culham J.C., Brandt S.A., Cavanagh P., Kanwisher N.G., Dale A.M., and Tootell R.B.H. Cortical fMRI activation produced by attentive tracking of moving targets. Journal of Neurophysiology 80 (1998) 2657-2670
8. Guttman S., Sekuler A.B., and Kellman P.J. Temporal variations in visual completion: A reflection of spatial limits?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 29 (2001) 1211-1227
9. Hollingworth A., Williams C.C., and Henderson J.M. To see and remember: Visually specific information is retained in memory from previously attended objects in natural scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 (2001) 761-768
10. Horowitz T.S., Brinkrant R.S., Fencsik D.E., Tran L., and Wolfe J.M. How do we track invisible objects?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13 (2006) 516-523
11. Kellman P.J., and Shipley T.F. A theory of visual interpolation in object perception. Cognitive Psychology 23 (1991) 141-221
12. Metzger W. Beobachtungen über phänomenale Identität. Psychologische Forschung 19 (1934) 1-49
13. Michotte A. The perception of causality (1946-1963), Basic Books, New York
14. Murray R.F., Sekuler A.B., and Bennet P.J. Time course of amodal completion revealed by a shape discrimination task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 8 (2001) 713-720
15. Remijn G.B., and Ito H. Occluding objects solve ambiguous motion perception in a 'streaming-bouncing' display. Progress in Biochemistry and Biophysics 31 suppl. (2004) 60
16. Rensink R.A. The dynamic representation of scenes. Visual Cognition 7 (2000) 17-42 Special Issue on Change Detection & Visual Memory
17. Rensink R.A., and Enns J.T. Early completion of occluded objects. Vision Research 38 (1998) 2489-2505
18. Rubin N. The role of junctions in surface completion and contour matching. Perception 30 (2001) 339-366
19. Scholl B.J., and Pylyshyn Z.W. Tracking multiple items through occlusion: Clues to visual objecthood. Cognitive Psychology 38 (1999) 259-290
20. Sekuler A.B., and Palmer S.E. Perception of partly occluded objects: A microgenetic analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 121 (1992) 95-111
21. Sekuler A.B., and Sekuler R. Collisions between moving visual targets: What controls alternative ways of seeing an ambiguous display?. Perception 28 (1999) 415-432
22. Sekuler R., Sekuler A.B., and Lau R. Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385 (1997) 308
23. Shimojo S., Scheier C., Nijhawan R., Shams L., Kamitani Y., and Watanabe K. Beyond perceptual modality: Auditory effects on visual perception. Acoustical Science & Technology 22 (2001) 61-67
24. Shore D.I., and Enns J.T. Shape completion time depends on the size of the occluded region. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 23 (1997) 980-998
25. von der Heydt R., Sugihara T., and Qiu F.T. Border ownership and attentional modulation in neurons of the visual cortex. Perception 33 (2004) 46
26. Watamaniuk S.N.J., and McKee S.P. Seeing motion behind occluders. Nature 377 (1995) 729-730
27. Watanabe K., and Shimojo S. Attentional modulation in perception of visual motion events. Perception 27 (1998) 1041-1054
28. Watanabe K., and Shimojo S. When sound affects vision: Effects of auditory grouping on visual motion perception. Psychological Science 12 (2001) 109-116
29. Yantis S. Multi-element visual tracking: Attention and perceptual organization. Cognitive Psychology 24 (1992) 295-340
30. Yantis S. Perceived continuity of occluded visual objects. Psychological Science 6 (1995) 182-186
31. Zhou H., Friedman H.S., and von der Heydt R. Coding of border ownership in monkey visual cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 20 (2000) 6594-6611