"Beauty lies in the eye of the beholder"? Aspects of beauty and attractiveness;"Schönheit liegt im auge des Betrachters"? Aspekte von Schönheit oder Attraktivität: Übersichtsarbeit

JDDG - Journal of the German Society of Dermatology

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 326-330

  Borelli, Claudia ^a   Berneburg, Mirjam ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Beauty; Facial aesthetics; Profile; Skin colour; Skin texture; Wrinkles

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DERMATOLOGY; ESTHETICS; FACIES; GENDER; HUMAN; MATURITY; PERCEPTION; PERSONALITY; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; TREATMENT PLANNING; ADULT; AGE; AGED; CHILD; COOPERATION; DENTITION; FACE ASYMMETRY; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; PSYCHOLOGY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKIN DISEASES; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; AGED; BEAUTY; CHILD; COOPERATIVE BEHAVIOR; DENTITION; ESTHETICS; FACIAL ASYMMETRY; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; SEX FACTORS; SKIN DISEASES; SOCIAL VALUES;

EID: 77951873256     PISSN: 16100379     EISSN: 16100387     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1610-0387.2009.07318.x     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Auger TA, Turley PK. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg 1999 14 : 7 18.
2. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991 49 : 963 969.
3. Mueser KT. You are only as pretty as you feel: facial expression as a determinant of physical attractiveness. J Pers Soc Psychol 1984 46 : 469 478.
4. Lew KK. Attitudes and perceptions of adults towards orthodontic treatment in an Asian community. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1993 21 : 31 35.
5. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu Rev Psychol 2006 57 : 199 226.
6. Langlois JH. Infant preferences of attractive faces: rudiments of stereotype? Dev Psychol 1987 23 : 363 369.
7. Perrett DI, May KA, Yoshikawa S. Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. Nature 1994 368 : 239 242.
8. Cellerino A. Psychobiology of facial attractiveness. J Endocrinol Invest 2003 26 : 45 48.
9. Baudouin JY, Tiberghien G. Symmetry, averageness, and feature size in the facial attractiveness of women. Acta Psychol (Amst) 2004 117 : 313 332.
10. Rhodes G, Geddes K, Jeffery L, Dziurawiec S, Clark A. Are average and symmetric faces attractive to infants? Discrimination and looking preferences. Perception 2002 31 : 315 321.
11. Springer IN, Wannicke B, Warnke PH, Zernial O, Wiltfang J, Russo PA, Terheyden H, Reinhardt A, Wolfart S. Facial attractiveness: visual impact of symmetry increases significantly towards the midline. Ann Plast Surg 2007 59 : 156 162.
12. Little AC, Apicella CL, Marlowe FW. Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proc Biol Sci 2007 274 : 3113 3117.
13. Zaidel DW, Aarde SM, Baig K. Appearance of symmetry, beauty, and health in human faces. Brain Cogn 2005 57 : 261 263.
14. Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001 119 : 464 471.
15. Sergl HG, Zentner A, Krause G. An experimental study of the esthetic effect of facial profiles. J Orofac Orthop 1998 59 : 116 126.
16. Hönn M, Dietz K, Godt A, Goz G. Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies. J Orofac Orthop 2005 66 : 187 196.
17. Hönn M, Dietz K, Eiselt ML, Goz G. Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education. J Orofac Orthop 2008 69 : 20 30.
18. Byrne PJ, Hilger PA. Lip augmentation. Facial Plast Surg 2004 20 : 31 38.
19. Maloney BP. Cosmetic surgery of the lips. Facial Plast Surg 1996 12 : 265 278.
20. Yehezkel S, Turley PK. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004 125 : 407 417.
21. Hier LA, Evans CA, BeGole EA, Giddon DB. Comparison of preferences in lip position using computer animated imaging. Angle Orthod 1999 69 : 231 238.
22. Matoula S, Pancherz H. Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces. Angle Orthod 2006 76 : 204 210.
23. Ricketts RM. Esthetics, environment, and the law of lip relation. Am J Orthod 1968 54 : 272 289.
24. Fink B, Matts PJ. The effects of skin colour distribution and topography cues on the perception of female facial age and health. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2008 22 : 493 498.
25. Matts PJ, Fink B, Grammer K, Burquest M. Color homogeneity and visual perception of age, health, and attractiveness of female facial skin. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007 57 : 977 984.
26. Odunze M, Rosenberg DS, Few JW. Periorbital aging and ethnic considerations: a focus on the lateral canthal complex. Plast Reconstr Surg 2008 121 : 1002 1008.
27. Tatarunaite E, Playle R, Hood K, Shaw W, Richmond S. Facial attractiveness: a longitudinal study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 127 : 676 682 quiz 755.
28. Schlosser JB, Preston CB, Lampasso J. The effects of computer-aided antero-posterior maxillary incisor movement on ratings of facial attractiveness. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2005 127 : 17 24.
29. Berg R. Orthodontic treatment - yes or no? A difficult decision in some cases. A contribution to the discussion. J Orofac Orthop 2001 62 : 410 421.
30. Van Der Geld P, Oosterveld P, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM. Age-related changes of the dental aesthetic zone at rest and during spontaneous smiling and speech. Eur J Orthod 2008 30 : 366 373.
31. Grosofsky A, Adkins S, Bastholm R, Meyer L, Krueger L, Meyer J, Torma P. Tooth color: effects on judgments of attractiveness and age. Percept Mot Skills 2003 96 : 43 48.
32. Draelos ZD. Perceptions of beauty. J Cosmet Dermatol 2007 6 : 143.
33. Edler RJ. Background considerations to facial aesthetics. J Orthod 2001 28 : 159 168.
34. Scheib JE, Gangestad SW, Thornhill R. Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. Proc Biol Sci 1999 266 : 1913 1917.
35. Perrett DI, Lee KJ, Penton-Voak I, Rowland D, Yoshikawa S, Burt DM, Henzi SP, Castles DL, Akamatsu S. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 1998 394 : 884 887.
36. Penton-Voak IS, Perrett DI, Castles DL, Kobayashi T, Burt DM, Murray LK, Minamisawa R. Menstrual cycle alters face preference. Nature 1999 399 : 741 742.
37. Giddon DB. Orthodontic applications of psychological and perceptual studies of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod 1995 1 : 82 93.
38. Tickle M, Kay EJ, Bearn D. Socioeconomic status and orthodontic treatment need. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999 27 : 413 418.
39. Flores-Mir C, Silva E, Barriga MI, Valverde RH, Lagravere MO, Major PW. Laypersons' perceptions of the esthetics of visible anterior occlusion. J Can Dent Assoc 2005 71 : 849.
40. Tung AW, Kiyak HA. Psychological influences on the timing of orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998 113 : 29 39.
41. Grundl M, Klein S, Horczakiwskyj R, Feser D, Jung M, Eisenmann-Klein M, Prantl L. The "jaguar's eye" as a new beauty trend? Age-related effects in judging the attractiveness of the oblique eye axis. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2008 32 : 915 919.