Skeletofacial morphology of attractive and nonattractive faces

Angle Orthodontist

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 204-210

  Matoula, Stamatia ^a   Pancherz, Hans ^a  

^a JUSTUS LIEBIG UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cephalometrics; Facial beauty

Indexed keywords

EID: 33644638639     PISSN: 00033219     EISSN: 00033219     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Guggenberger B. Einfach Schön, Schönheit als Soziale Macht. Hamburg, Germany: Rotbuch Verlag; 1995;6-30.
2. Keating C. Gender and the physiognomy of dominance and attractiveness. Soc Psychol Q. 1985;48:61-70.
3. Braun C, Gründl M, Marberger C, Scherber C. Beauty-check - Ursachen und Folgen von Attraktivität. Projektabschlussbericht. Available at: unter: http://www.beautycheck.de/bericht/bericht.htm. Accessed 2001.
4. Dion K, Berscheid E, Walster E. What is beautiful is good. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1972;24:285-290.
5. Shaw WC, Dave M, Charles CR. The influence of dentofacial appearance on the social attractiveness of young adults. Am J Orthod. 1985;87:21-26.
6. Adams GR. The Effects of Physical Attractiveness on the Socialization Process. Psychological Aspects of Facial Form. Ann Arbor, Mich: Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan; 1980:25-47.
7. Giddon DB. Orthodontic applications of psychological and perceptual studies of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995; 1:82-93.
8. Peck H, Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics. Angle Orthod. 1970:40:284-318.
9. Peck S, Peck H. The aesthetically pleasing face. Trans Eur Orthod Soc. 1971;175-184.
10. Baud CV. Harmonie der Gesichtszüge. Eine Studie über Schönheit, kosmetische Gesichtschirurgie und Mienenspiegel. Basel, Switzerland: S Karger; 1982;5-25.
11. Ricketts RM. Divine proportion in facial esthetics. Clin Plast Surg. 1982;9:401-422.
12. Kerr WJS. Panel perception of facial attractiveness. Br J Orthod. 1990:17:299-304.
13. Vargo JK, Gladwin M, Ngan P. Association between ratings of facial attractiveness and patients' motivation for orthognathic surgery. Orthod Craniofacial Res. 2003;6:63-71.
14. Downs W. Analysis of dentofacial profile. Angle Orthod. 1956;26:191-212.
15. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod. 1953;39:729-755.
16. Tulloch C, Phillips C, Dann C. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness. Int J Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1993;8:171-179.
17. Lundström A, Popovich F, Woodside DG. Panel assessments of the facial frontal view as related to mandibular growth direction. Eur J Orthod. 1989;11:290-297.
18. Heiß A. "Göttliche Proportionen" des attraktiven Gesichtes. Dis. Med Dent. Giessen, Germany: Justus Liebig Universität; 2002;1-5.
19. Ricketts RM. The biologic significance of the divine proportion and Fibonacci series. Am J Orthod. 1982;81:351-370.
20. Peck S, Peck L. Selected aspects of the art and science of facial esthetics. Semin Orthod. 1995;1:105-126.
21. Yehezkel S, Turley P. Changes in the African American female profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the 20th century. Am J Orthod. 2004:125:407-417.
22. Hall D, Taylor R, Jacobson A, Sadowsky L. The perception of optimal profile in African Americans versus white Ameri cans as assessed by orthodontists and the lay public. Am J Orthod. 2000;118:514-525.
23. Auger TA, Turley PK. The female soft tissue profile as presented in fashion magazines during the 1900s: a photographic analysis. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1990; 14:7-18.
24. Bisson M, Grobbelaar A. The esthetic properties of lips: a comparison of models and nonmodels. Angle Orthod. 2004; 74:162-166.
25. Douglas DN, Turley P. Changes in the Caucasian male facial profile as depicted in fashion magazines during the twentieth century. Am J Orthod, 1998;114:208-217.
26. Czanecki ST, Nanda Ram, Currier GF. Perceptions of a balanced facial profile. Am J Orthod, 1993;104:180-187.
27. Cox NH, Van der Linden F. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod. 1971;60:175-183.
28. Johnston V, Franklin M. Is beauty in the eye of the beholder? Ethol Sociobiol. 1993;14:183-199.
29. Foster E. Profile preferences among diversified groups. Angle Orthod. 1981;43:316-325.
30. Woolnoth T. The Study of the Human Face. London, UK: W. Teedie; 1895:181-244.
31. Grammer K, Thornhill R. Human facial attractiveness and sexual selection: the role of symmetry and averageness. J Comp Psychol. 1994:108:233-242.
32. Bergman RT. Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. Am J Orthod. 1999;116:373-389.
33. DeSmit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod. 1983;86:67-73.
34. Arnett W, Bergman R. Facial keys to orthodontic diagnosis and treatment planning. Part I. Am J Orthod. 1993;103:299-312.
35. Bittner C, Pancherz H. Facial morphology and malocclusions. Am J Orthod. 1990;97:308-315.
36. Michiels G, Sather AH. Validity and reliability of facial profile evaluation in vertical and horizontal dimensions from lateral cephalograms and lateral photographs. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1994;9:43-54.
37. Perseo G. The "Beauty" of homo sapiens: standard canons, ethnical, geometrical and morphological facial biotypes. An explained collection of frontal north-Europide contemporary beauty facial canons. Part I. Virtual J Orthod. 2002;30:150-162.
38. Iliffe AH. A study of preferences in feminine beauty. Br J Psychol. 1960;51:267-273.
39. Michiels G, Sather H. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg. 1994;9:95-103.
40. Powell SJ, Rayson RK. The profile in facial aesthetics. Br J Orthod. 1974:3:207-215.
41. Tedesco LA, Albino JE, Cunat JJ, Slakter MJ, Waltz KJ. A dental-facial attractiveness scale. Am J Orthod. 1983;83: 44-46.
42. Yami EA, Kuijpers-Jagtman AM, Van't Hof M. Assessment of dental and facial aesthetics in adolescents. Eur J Orthod. 1998;20:399-405.
43. Riggio RE, Wideman K, Salinas T. Beauty is more than skin deep: components of attractiveness. Basic Appl Soc Psychol. 1991:12:423-439.