Perceived relative attractiveness of facial profiles with varying degrees of skeletal anomalies;Attraktivität von Gesichtsprofilen unterschiedlicher skelettaler Anomalieausprägungen

Journal of Orofacial Orthopedics

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 187-196

  Hönn, Mirjam ^a,b   Dietz, Klaus ^a   Godt, Arnim ^a   Göz, Gernot ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b School of Dental Medicine   (Germany)

Author keywords

Attractiveness; Perception; Profile; Skeletal malocclusion

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLEGE STUDENT; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; DENTIST; FACE PROFILE; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMAN; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNATHIA; RETROGNATHIA; SCORING SYSTEM; SEX DIFFERENCE; SKELETON MALFORMATION;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; BEAUTY; ESTHETICS, DENTAL; FEMALE; GERMANY; HUMANS; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; PUBLIC OPINION; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 21344469480     PISSN: 14345293     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00056-005-0445-0     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Austermann KH. Chirurgische Behandlung der Dysgnathien. In: Horch HH. Praxis der Zahnheilkunde 10/2. Mund-Kiefer-Gesichtschirurgie II. München-Wien-Baltimore: Urban&Schwarzenberg, 1990:105-97.
2. Cox N, van der Linden F. Facial harmony. Am J Orthod 1971;60:175-83.
3. De Smit A, Dermaut L. Soft-tissue profile preference. Am J Orthod 1984;86:67-73.
4. Dunlevy HA, White RP, Proffit WR, Turvey TA. Professional and lay judgment of facial aesthetic changes following orthognathic surgery. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1987;3:151-8.
5. Faure JC, Rieffe C, Maltha JC. The influence of different facial components on facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 2002;24:1-7.
6. Jefferson Y. Skeletal types: Key to unraveling the mystery of facial beauty and its biologic significance. J Gen Orthod 1996;7:7-25.
7. Lines PA, Lines RR, Lines CA. Profilemetrics and facial esthetics. Am J Orthod 1978;73:648-57.
8. Michel Ch, Reuther J. Orthopädische Chirurgie des Gesichtsschädels. In: Hausamen JE, Machtens E, Reuther J. Kirschnersche allgemeine und spezielle Operationslehre, Bd. 2. Mund-, Kiefer- und Gesichtschirurgie. Berlin-Heidelberg-New York: Springer Verlag, 1995:359-403.
9. Michiels G, Sather AH. Determinants of facial attractiveness in a sample of white women. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1994;9:95-103.
10. Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Facial soft tissue harmony and growth in orthodontic treatment. Semin Orthod 1995;1:67-81.
11. Peerlings RHJ, Kuijpers-Jagtmann AM, Hoeksma JB. A photographic scale to measure facial aesthetics. Eur J Orthod 1995;17:101-09.
12. Pogrel MA. What are normal esthetic values? J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1991;49:963-9.
13. Schwarz AM. Röntgenostatik. München: Urban&Schwarzenberg, 1958.
14. Sergl HG. Experimentalpsychologische Untersuchung zur Ausdruckswirkung des Gesichtsprofils. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1968;23:414-24.
15. Sergl HG, Lautenbach B. Über den Wert ästhetischer Normen im Rahmen der Profilbeurteilung. Fortschr Kieferorthop 1984;45: 87-100.
16. Sergl HG, Zentner A, Krause G. An experimental study of the esthetic effect of facial profiles. J Orofac Orthop 1998;59:116-26.
17. Spyropoulos MN, Halazonetis DJ. Significance of the soft tissue profile on facial esthetics. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2001;119:464-71.
18. Viazis AD. A new measurement of profile esthetics. J Clin Orthod 1991;2525:15-20.
19. Tulloch C, Phillips C, Dann C. Cephalometric measures as indicators of facial attractiveness. Int J Adult Orthod Orthognath Surg 1993;8:171-9.