Student perceptions about computerized testing in introductory managerial accounting

Journal of Accounting Education

Volumn 27, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 59-70

  Apostolou, Barbara ^a   Blue, Michael A ^b   Daigle, Ronald J ^c  

^a WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c SAM HOUSTON STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951766598     PISSN: 07485751     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaccedu.2010.02.003     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Apostolou B.A., Watson S.F., Hassell J.M., Webber S.A. Accounting education literature review (1997-1999). Journal of Accounting Education 2001, 19(1):1-61.
2. Boyce G. Computer-assisted teaching and learning in accounting: Pedagogy or product?. Journal of Accounting Education 1999, 17(2-3):191-220.
3. Bugbee A.C. Examination on demand: Findings in ten years of testing by computer 1982-1991 1992, TRO Learning, Edina, MN.
4. Bunderson C.V., Inouye D.K., Olsen J.B. The four generations of computerized educational measurement. Educational measurement 1989, 367-407. The Macmillan Company, New York. 3rd ed. R.L. Linn (Ed.).
5. Butler, D.L. (2003). The impact of computer-based testing on student attitudes and behavior. The technology source archives at the University of North Carolina, January/February. <> Accessed 26.01.2010. http://technologysource.org/article/impact_of_computerbased_testing_on_student_attitudes_and_behavior/.
6. deLange P., Suwardy T., Mavondo F. Integrating a virtual learning environment into an introductory accounting course: Determinants of student motivation. Accounting Education 2003, 12(1):1-14.
7. Grist S., Rudner L., Wise L. Computer adaptive tests. ERIC Clearinghouse on tests, measurement, and evaluation 1989, American Institute for Research, Washington, DC.
8. Hambleton R.K., Zaal J.N., Pieters J.M. Computerized adaptive tests: Theory, applications, and standards. Advances in educational and psychological testing 1991, 341-366. Kluwer, Boston. R.K. Hambleton, J.N. Zaal (Eds.).
9. McBride J.R. Computerized adaptive testing. Educational Leadership 1985, 43(2):25-28.
10. Peterson B.K., Reider B.P. Perceptions of computer-based testing: A focus on the CFM examination. Journal of Accounting Education 2002, 20(4):265-284.
11. Questionmark™ Perception™. (2009). <> Accessed 26.01.2010. http://www.questionmark.com/us/home.htm.
12. Rebele J.E., Apostolou B.A., Buckless F.A., Hassell J.M., Paquette L.R., Stout D.E. Accounting education literature review (1991-1997), part I: Curriculum and instructional approaches. Journal of Accounting Education 1998, 16(1):1-51.
13. Rebele J.E., Apostolou B.A., Buckless F.A., Hassell J.M., Paquette L.R., Stout D.E. Accounting education literature review (1991-1997), part II: Students, educational technology, assessment, and faculty issues. Journal of Accounting Education 1998, 16(2):179-245.
14. Sereci S.G. Computerized adaptive testing: An introduction. Measuring up: Assessment issues for teachers counselors and administrators 2003, 685-694. CAPS Press, Greensboro. J.E. Wall, G.R. Walz (Eds.).
15. Watson S.F., Apostolou B.A., Hassell J.M., Webber S.A. Accounting education literature review (2000-2002). Journal of Accounting Education 2003, 21(4):267-327.
16. Watson S.F., Apostolou B.A., Hassell J.M., Webber S.A. Accounting education literature review (2003-2005). Journal of Accounting Education 2007, 25(1):1-58.
17. Wise S.L., Plake B.S. Research on the effects of administering tests via computers. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice 1989, 8:5-10.