The movement analysis of temporal adverbial clauses

English Language and Linguistics

Volumn 13, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 385-408

  Haegeman, Liliane ^a  

^a GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951736235     PISSN: 13606743     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S1360674309990165     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Aboh, Enoch. 2005. Deriving relative and factive constructions in Kwa. In Laura Brug̀e, Giuliana Giusti, Nicol̀a Munaro, Walter Schweikert & Gina Turano (eds.), Contributions to the thirtieth Incontro di Grammatica Generativa, 265-285 Venice: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina
2. Abraham, Werner. 2008. Illocutive Force is speaker and information source concern. Ms. University of Vienna/Munich
3. Arsenijevíc, Boban. 2006.The correlative construction as a type of conditional clause. GLIF seminar, University Pompeu Fabra. 19 May 2006
4. Barbiers, Sjef. 2007. On the periphery of imperative and declarative clauses in Dutch and German. In Wim van der Wurff (ed.), Imperative clauses in generative grammar, 95-112. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
5. Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumanya Pancheva. 2002. A cross-constructional analysis of if clauses. Paper presented at the Syntax Seminar: interface in the CP domain, Zentrum fur Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft, Berlin, 9 March 2002
6. Bhatt, Rajesh & Roumanya Pancheva. 2006. Conditionals. In Everaert & Van Riemsdijk (eds.), vol.1: 638-687
7. Bianchi, Valentina. 2000. On time adverbials. Rivista di Linguistica 12, 77-106
8. Bianchi, Valentina, Mario Squartini & Pier Marco Bertinetto. 1995. Perspective point and textual dynamics. In Pier Marco Bertinetti, Valentina Bianchi, James Higginbotham & Mario Squartini (eds.), Temporal reference, aspect and actionality, vol.1: Semantic and syntactic perspectives, 309-324 Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier
9. Bresnan, Joan & Jane Grimshaw. 1978. The syntax of free relatives in English. Linguistic Inquiry 9, 331-391
10. Carre, Jonathan. 2006. Predicate around be constructions in English (A look at PABs and locative PABs). Student's paper: Master 2: linguistique anglaise. Universit́e Charles de Gaulle, Lille III
11. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A- dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
12. Citko, Barbara. 2000. On the syntax and semantics of Polish adjunct clauses. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 8, 1-38
13. Collins, Chris. 1994. The factive construction in Kwa. Travaux de recherche sur le cŕeole haitien 23, 31-65. Universit́e du Quebec ̀a Montreal
14. Culicover, Peter. 1991. Topicalization, inversion and complementizers in English. In Dennis Delfitto et al. (eds.), Going Romance and beyond (OTS Working Papers), 1-44. Utrecht: University of Utrecht
15. Culicover, Peter W. & Robert D. Levine. 2001. Stylistic inversion in English: A reconsideration. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19, 283-310
16. De Cat, Ćecile. 2004. Dislocation without movement. ZAS papers in Linguistics 35, 1
17. Proceedings of the dislocated elements workshop, November 2003, 77-109
18. De Cat, Ćecile. 2007. French dislocation without movement. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 25, 485-534
19. Declerck, Renaat. 1997. When-clauses and temporal structure. London: Routledge
20. Demirdache, Hamida & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2004. The syntax of time adverbs. In Jacqueline Gúeron & Jacqueline Lecarme (eds.), The syntax of time, 143-180 Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
21. Dikken, Marcel den & Alma Naess 1993. Case dependencies: The case of predicate inversion. Linguistic Review 10, 303-336
22. Dikken, Marcel den. 2006. Either float and the syntax of co-or-dination. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 24, 689-749
23. Dubinsky, Stanley & Kemp Williams. 1995. Recategorization of prepositions as complementizers: The case of temporal prepositions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 26, 125-137
24. Emonds, Joseph. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. PhD dissertation, MIT
25. Emonds, Joseph. 1976. A transformational approach to English syntax. New York: Academic Press
26. Emonds, Joseph. 2004. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In David Adger, Ćecile De Cat & Georges Tsoulas (eds.), Peripheries, 75-121. Dordrecht: Kluwer
27. Enç, Murvet. 1987. Anchoring conditions for tense. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 633-657
28. Ernst, Thomas. 2002. The syntax of adjuncts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
29. Everaert, Martin & Henk Van Riemsdijk (eds.). 2006. The Blackwell companion to syntax. Oxford and Boston: Blackwell
30. Gaertner, Hans-Martin. 2001. Are there V2 relative clauses in German∼ Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3, 97-141
31. Geis, Michael. 1970. Adverbial subordinate clauses in English. PhD dissertation, MIT
32. Geis, Michael. 1975. English time and place adverbials. Working Papers in Linguistics 18, Ohio State University. 1-11
33. Geis, Michael. 1985. The syntax of conditional sentences. In Michael Geis (ed.). Studies in Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar, 130-159 Columbus, OH: Department of Linguistics, OSU
34. Green, Georgia. 1976. Main Clause Phenomena in subordinate clauses. Language 52, 382-397
35. Green, Georgia. 1996. Distinguishing main and subordinate clauses. MS, University of Illinois
36. Haegeman, Liliane. 2000. Negative inversion, the Neg criterion and the structure of CP. In Laurence Horn & Yasuhiko Kato (eds.), Negation and polarity, 29-69. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press
37. Haegeman, Liliane. 2003a. Conditional clauses: external and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18, 317-339
38. Haegeman, Liliane. 2003b. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 34, 640-649
39. Haegeman, Liliane. 2006a. Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In Raffaella Zanuttini, Hector Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds.), Negation, tense and clausal architecture: Cross-linguistic investigations, 27-52. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press
40. Haegeman, Liliane. 2006b. Conditionals, factives and the left periphery. Lingua 116, 1651-1669
41. Haegeman, Liliane. 2007. Operator movement and topicalization in adverbial clauses. Folia Linguistica 41, 279-325
42. Haegeman, Liliane. 1991/2009. Parenthetical adverbials: The radical orphanage approach. In Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi (eds.), Aspects of modern English linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday, 232-54. Tokyo: Kaitakushi. Reprinted in Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Dislocated elements in discourse: Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic perspectives, 331-347 New York: Routledge
43. Haegeman, Liliane. to appear. Speculations on the syntax of adverbial clauses. In Kleanthes Grohmann & Ianthi Tsimpli (eds.), Exploring the left periphery. Lingua thematic issue
44. Haegeman, Liliane (in preparation) The movement derivation of conditionals. MS, University of Ghent, Dept of English
45. Haegeman, Liliane, Benjamin Shaer & Werner Frey (2009). Postscript: Problems and solutions for orphan analyses. In Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn (eds.), Dislocated elements in discourse: Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic perspectives, 348-365 New York: Routledge
46. Heycock, Caroline. 2006. Embedded root phenomena. In Everaert & Van Riemsdijk (eds.), vol.II: 174-209
47. Hill, Virginia. 2007. Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field. Linguistic Review 24, 61-86
48. Hooper, John & Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of Root Transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4, 465-497
49. Hornstein, Norbert. 1990. As time goes by. Tense and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
50. Ingham, Richard. 2008. Negative co-ordination in Middle English. Paper presented at conference on Continuity and Change in Grammar. University of Cambridge; 18-20 March 2008
51. Kayne, Richard. 2005. Movement and silence. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press
52. Komagata, Nobo. 2003. Information structure in subordinate and subordinate-like clauses. Journal of Logic, Language and Information 12, 301-318
53. Larson, Richard. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3, 217-1164
54. Larson, Richard. 1987. Missing prepositions and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 239-266
55. Larson, Richard. 1990. Extraction and multiple selection in PP. The Linguistic Review 7, 169-182
56. Lipt́ak, Aniko. 2005. Relativization strategies in temporal adjunct clauses. LIVY Yearbook 5, 133-185 Philadelphia and Amsterdam: John Benjamins
57. Maki, Hideki, Lizanne Kaiser, & Masao Ochi. 1999. Embedded topicalization in English and Japanese. Lingua 109, 1-14
58. McCloskey, James. 2006. Questions and questioning in a local English. In Raffaella Zanuttini, Hector Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul Portner (eds.), Negation, tense and clausal architecture: Cross-linguistic investigations, 86-126. Georgetown: Georgetown University Press
59. Meinunger, Andŕe. 2004. Verb Second in German(ic) and mood selection in Romance. Paper presented at the Workshop on Clause Typing and the Left Periphery. Georgetown University Round Table
60. Melvold, J. 1991. Factivity and definiteness. In Lisa Cheng & Hamida Demirdache (eds.), More papers on Wh-Movement (MIT Working Papers in Linguistics, no. 15), 97-117. Cambridge, MA: MIT
61. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman
62. Reichenbach, Hans. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. Reprinted 1966. New York: Free Press
63. Riemsdijk, Henk van 2006. Free relatives. In Everaert & Van Riemsdijk (eds.), vol.II: 338-382
64. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman (ed.), Elements of grammar, 281-337. Kluwer: Dordrecht
65. Rizzi, Luigi & Ur Shlonsky. 2006. Satisfying the subject criterion by a nonsubject: English locative inversion and heavy NP shift. In Mara Frascarelli (ed.), Phases of interpretation, 341-362 Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
66. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2002. The Extended Projection Principle as a condition on the Tense Dependency. In Peter Svenonius (ed.), Subjects, expletives and the IPP, 125-55. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Rudanko, Juhani 1981. On a structural ambiguity in English subordinate clauses of time. English Studies 62, 53-55
67. Sawada, Miyuki & Richard Larson. 2004. Presupposition and root transforms in adjunct clauses. NELS 34
68. Schachter, Paul. 1992. Comments on Bresnan and Kanerva's 'Locative inversion in Chichewa: a case study of factorization in grammar'. In Tim Stowell & Eric Wehrli (eds.), Syntax and semantics 26, 103-110 New York: Academic Press
69. Sobin, Nicolas. 2003. Negative inversion as nonmovement. Syntax 6: 183-222
70. Speas, Margaret & Carol Tenny. 2003. Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Anne-Marie di Sciullo (ed.), Asymmetry in grammar, vol.I: Syntax and semantics, 315-344 Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins
71. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell
72. Starke, Michal. 2001. Move dissolves into Merge: a theory of locality. PhD dissertation, University of Geneva. http://theoling.auf.net/papers/starke- michal/
73. Stephens, Nola M. 2006. Norwegian when-clauses. In Miriam Butt & Tracy Holloway King (eds.), Proceedings of the LFG06 conference. Universität Konstanz. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. http://clsli- publications.stanford.edu/
74. Stump, Gregory. 1985. The semantic variability of absolute constructions. Dordrecht: Reidel. Tomaszewicz, Barbara. To appear. Subjunctive mood in Polish. Proceedings of the FDSL7-conference. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang
75. Ü rögdi, Barbara. 2008. Temporal adverbial clauses with or without operator movement. MS, Research Institute for Linguistics, Hungarian Academy of Sciences
76. Ward, Gregory L. 1988. The semantics and pragmatics of preposing. New York: Garland
77. Zribi-Hertz, Anne & Lamine Diagne. 2003. D́eficience flexionnelle et temps topical en Wolof. In Patrick Sauzet & Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.), Typologie des langues d'Afrique et universaux de la grammaire, vol.2: Benue-Kwa et Wolof, 205-231 Paris: L'Harmattan