Conditionals, factives and the left periphery

Lingua

Volumn 116, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 1651-1669

  Haegeman, Liliane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Adverbial clauses; Factive predicates; Split CP

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748777448     PISSN: 00243841     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.lingua.2005.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Aboh E. The Morphosyntax of Complement-Head Sequences. Clause Structure and Word Order Patterns in Kwa (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
2. Barbiers S. Remnant stranding and the theory of movement. In: Alexiadou A., Anagnostopolou E., Barbiers S., and Gaertner H.-M. (Eds). Dimensions of Movement (2002), John Benjamins, Amsterdam, New York 47-69
3. Bayer, J., 2001. Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In: Féry, C., Sternefeld, W. (Eds.), Audiatur Vox Sapientiae, Studia Grammatica, vol. 52, pp. 15-47.
4. Benincà P., and Poletto C. Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In: Rizzi L. (Ed). The Structure of CP and IP (2004), Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York 52-75
5. Bhatt R., and Yoon J. On the composition of Comp and parameters of V-2. In: Bates D. (Ed). Proceedings of WCCFL vol. 10 (1992), Stanford CSLI Publication 41-53
6. Cinque G. On the theory of relative clauses and markedness. The Linguistic Review 1 (1981) 247-296
7. Cinque G. Adverbs and Functional Heads (1999), Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York
8. Declerck R., and Reed S. Conditionals: A Comprehensive Empirical Analysis (2001), Mouton de Gruyter, Berlin
9. Emonds, J., 1970. Root and Structure-preserving Transformations. Ph.D. dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
10. Emonds J. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In: Adger D., de Cat C., and Tsoulas G. (Eds). Peripheries (2004), Kluwer, Dordrecht 75-120
11. Fabb N. The difference between English restrictive and non-restrictive relative clauses. Journal of Linguistics 26 (1990) 57-79
12. Von Fintel, K., Iatridou, S., 2002. If and when if clauses can restrict quantifiers. Unpublished manuscript. MIT Cambridge.
13. Von Fintel K., and Iatridou S. Epistemic containment. Linguistic Inquiry 34 (2003) 173-198
14. Gärtner H.-M. Are there V2 relative clauses in German?. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 3 (2001) 97-141
15. Van Gelderen, E., 2003. The CP and split CP cross-linguistically. Unpublished manuscript.
16. Van Gelderen E. Grammaticalization as Economy (2004), John Benjamins, New York, Amsterdam
17. Grewendorf G. Left dislocation as movement. In: Mauck S., and Mittelstaedt J. (Eds). Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics vol. 2, Fall (2002) 31-81
18. Haegeman L. Parasitic gaps and adverbial clauses. Journal of Linguistics 20 (1984) 229-232
19. Haegeman L. Pragmatic conditionals in English. Folia Linguistica 18 (1984) 485-502
20. Haegeman L. Remarks on adverbial clauses and definite anaphora. Linguistic Inquiry 15 (1984) 712-715
21. Haegeman L. Parenthetical adverbials: the radical orphanage approach. In: Chiba S., Ogawa A., Fuiwara Y., Yamada N., Koma O., and Yagi T. (Eds). Aspects of Modern English Linguistics: Papers Presented to Masatomo Ukaji on His 60th Birthday (1991), Kaitakusha, Tokyo 232-253
22. Haegeman, L., 2002. Anchoring to Speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. In: Mauck, S., Mittelstaedt, J. (Eds.), Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics, vol. 2, Fall, pp. 117-180.
23. Haegeman L. Conditional clauses: external and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18 (2003) 317-339
24. Haegeman, L., 2003b. Speculations on adverbial fronting and the Left Periphery. In: Guéron, J., Tasmowski, L. (Eds.), Temps et Point de Vue/Tense and Point of View Publidix, Paris, pp. 329-365.
25. Haegeman, L., 2004. Topicalization, CLLD and the left periphery. In: Shaer, B., Frey, W., Maienborn, C. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, ZAS Berlin, November 2003. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35, vol. 1, pp. 157-192.
26. Hengeveld K. Layers and operators in Functional Grammar. Journal of Linguistics 25 (1989) 127-158
27. Hooper J., and Thompson S. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4 (1973) 465-497
28. Kiparsky P., and Kiparsky C. Fact. In: Steinberg D., and Jakobovitz L. (Eds). Semantics: An Interdisciplinary Reader (1971), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 345-369
29. Kuno S. The Structure of the Japanese Language (1973), MIT Press, Cambridge
30. Kuroda S.-Y. Whether we agree or not: a comparative syntax of English and Japanese. Japanese Syntax and Semantics (1992), Kluwer, Dordrecht pp. 315-357
31. Lu, P., 2003. La Subordination Adverbiale en Chinois Contemporain. Ph.D. thesis: Paris 7.
32. Maki H., Kaiser L., and Ochi M. Embedded topicalization in English and Japanese. Lingua 109 (1999) 1-14
33. McCloskey, J., 2004. Questions in a local English. Paper presented at Georgetown University Round Table. Handout.
34. McCloskey, J., in press. Questions and questioning in a local English. In: Zanuttini, R., Campos, H., Herburger, E., Portner, P. (Eds.), Negation, Tense and Clausal Architecture: Cross-Linguistic Investigations. Georgetown University Press, Georgetown.
35. Meinunger, A., 2004. Verb Second in German(ic) and Mood selection in Romance. Paper presented at the Workshop on Clause Typing and the Left Periphery. Georgetown University Round Table.
36. Nilsen, Ø., 2004. Domains for adverbs. In: Alexiadou, A. (Ed.), Adverbs Across Frameworks. Lingua 114, 809-847.
37. Quirk R., Greenbaum J., Leech G., and Svartvik J. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language (1985), Longman, London
38. Raposo, E., 1996. Towards a unification of topic constructions. Unpublished manuscript. University of California, Santa Barbara.
39. Raposo E., and Uriagereka J. Clitic placement in Western Iberian. In: Cinque G., and Kayne R. (Eds). The Oxford Handbook of Comparative Syntax (2005), Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York 639-697
40. Rizzi L. The fine structure of the left periphery. In: Haegeman L. (Ed). Elements of Grammar (1997), Kluwer, Dordrecht 281-337
41. Rizzi L. Locality and left periphery. In: Belletti A. (Ed). Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures vol. 3 (2004), Oxford University Press, New York, Oxford 223-251
42. Roussou, A., 1994. The Syntax of Complementizers. Ph.D. dissertation, UCL.
43. Roussou A. On the left periphery. Modal particles and complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1 (2000) 65-94
44. Rutherford W. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46 (1970) 97-115
45. Safir K. Relative clauses in a theory of binding and levels. Linguistic Inquiry 17 (1986) 663-690
46. Sawada, M., Larson, R.K., 2004. Presupposition and root transforms in adjunct clauses. In: Wolf., M., Moulton, K. (Eds.), Proceedings of NELS 34. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, pp. 517-528.
47. Shaer, B., Frey, W., 2003. Toward an account of English and German left-peripheral elements. Paper presented at the LAGB Oxford, September 2003.
48. Shaer, B., Frey, W., 2004. 'Integrated' and 'non-integrated' left peripheral elements in German and English. In: Shaer, B., Frey, W., Maienborn, C. (Eds), Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, ZAS Berlin, November 2003. ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35, vol. 2, pp. 465-502.
49. Speas M. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114 (2004) 255-277
50. Speas, M., 2004b. Evidential paradigms, world variables and person agreement features. In: Safir, S., Bianchi, V. (Eds.), Special Issue of The Italian Journal of Linguistics 16(1), 253-280.
51. Sperber D., and Wilson D. Relevance (1986), Blackwell, Oxford
52. Tenny C. Core events and adverbial modification. In: Tenny C., and Pustejovsky J. (Eds). Events as Grammatical Objects (2000), CSLI Publications, Stanford 285-334
53. Urmson J.-O. Parenthetical verbs. In: Caton C. (Ed). Philosophy and Ordinary Language (1963), University of Illinois Press, Urbana 220-240
54. Verstraete, J.-C., 2002. Interpersonal Grammar and Clause Combining in English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Leuven.
55. Whitman, J., 1989. Topic, modality, and IP structure. In: Kuno, S., et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Third Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics. Hanshun, Seoul.
56. Zanuttini R., and Portner P. Exclamative clauses: at the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79 (2003) 39-81
57. Zubizaretta M.-L. Preverbal subjects in romance interrogatives. In: Hulk A., and Pollock J.-Y. (Eds). Subject Inversion in Romance and the Theory of Universal Grammar (2001), Oxford University Press, Oxford, New York 183-204