Argument fronting in English, romance CLLD, and the left periphery

Crosslinguistic Research in Syntax and Semantics: Negation, Tense, and Clausal Architecture

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 27-52

  Haegeman, Liliane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 40649091039     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Anagnostopoulou, E. 1997. Clitic left dislocation and contrastive left dislocation. In Materials on left dislocation, ed. E. Anagnostopoulou, H. van Riemsdijk, and F. Zwarts, 151-192. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Andersson, L.-G. 1975. Form and function of subordinate clauses. Gothenburg Monographs on Linguistics, 1. Department of Linguistics, University of Göteborg, Sweden.
3. Ashby, W. 1988. The syntax, pragmatics, and sociolinguistics of left- and right-dislocations in French. Lingua 75: 203-29.
4. Authier, J.-M. 1992. Iterated CPs and embedded topicalization. Linguistic Inquiry 23: 329-36.
5. Barbiers, S. 2002. Remnant stranding and the theory of movement. In Dimensions of movement, ed. A. Alexiadou, E. Anagnostopolou, S. Barbiers, and H.-M. Gaertner, 47-69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
6. Barnes, B. 1985. Left detachment in spoken Standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. Bayer, J. 2001. Asymmetry in emphatic topicalization. In Audiatur Vox Sapientiae, ed. C. Féry and W. Sternefeld. Studia Grammatica 52: 15-47.
8. Belletti, A.. 2001. Aspects of the low IP area. Unpublished manuscript, University of Siena, Italy.
9. Benincà, P. 2001. The position of topic and focus in the left periphery. In Current studies in Italian linguistics offered to Lorenzo Renzi, ed. G. Cinque and G. Salvi, 39-64. Dordrecht: Foris.
10. Benincà, P., and C. Poletto. 2004. Topic, focus and V2: Defining the CP sublayers. In The structure of CP and IP. Vol. 2 of The cartography of syntactic structures, ed. L. Rizzi, 52-75. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
11. Bhatt R., and J. Yoon. 1992. On the composition of Comp and parameters of V-2. In WCCFL 10: Proceedings of the tenth West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics, ed. D. Bates, 41-53. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
12. Bianchi, V. 2003. On finiteness as logophoric anchoring. In Temps et point de vue/Time and point of view, ed. J. Guéron and L. Tasmowski, 213-246. Paris: Publidix, Université Paris X.
13. Bianchi, V., and P. M. Bertinetto. 1996. Temporal adverbs and the notion of perspective point. In Semantyka a konfrontacja jezykowa, ed. V. Koseska-Toszewa and D. Rytel-Kuc, 11-21. Nauk: Warszawa Polska Akademia.
14. Bianchi, V., P. M. Bertinetto, and M. Squartini. 1995. Perspective point and textual dynamics. In Temporal reference: Aspect and actionality. Vol. 1 of Semantic and syntactic perspective, ed. P. M.
15. Bertinetto, V. Bianchi, M. Squartini, and J. Higginbotham, 309-24. Turin: Rosenberg and Sellier.
16. Boeckx, C. 1998. Raising in Romance. Unpublished manuscript, University of Connecticut.
17. Boeckx, C. 2001. On the co-occurrence of expletives and definite subjects in Germanic. In Issues in formal German(ic) typology, ed. W. Abraham and J.-W. Zwart, 45-64. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Bowers, J. 1993. The syntax of predication. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 591-65.
19. Cecchetto, C. 2000. Doubling structures and reconstruction. Probus 12: 1-34.
20. Cinque, G. 1990. Types of A'-dependencies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Cinque, G. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
22. Davies, W., and S. Dubinsky. (1999). Sentential subjects as complex NPs: New reasons for an old account of subjacency. In CLS 34-1: Papers from the Main Session, ed. M. C. Gruber, D. Higgins, K. S. Olson, and T. Wysocki, 83-94.
23. Davies, W., and S. Dubinsky. 2001. Functional architecture and the distribution of subject properties. In Objects and other subjects, ed. W. Davies and S. Dubinsky, 247-80. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
24. Davison, A. 1979. Some mysteries of subordination. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 9: 105-28.
25. Declerck, R., and S. Reed. 2001. Conditionals: A comprehensive empirical analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
26. Delfitto, D. 2002. On the semantics of pronominal clitics and some of its consequences. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1: 41-69.
27. Emonds, J. 1970. Root and structure-preserving transformations. PhD diss., Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
28. Emonds, J. 2004. Unspecified categories as the key to root constructions. In Peripheries, ed. D. Adger, C. de Cat, and G. Tsoulas, 75-120. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
29. Escobar, L. 1997. Clitic left dislocation and other relatives. In Materials on left dislocation, ed. E. Anagnostopolou, H. van Riemsdijk, and F. Zwarts, 233-74. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
30. Frascarelli, M., and R. Hinterhölzl. 2004. Types of topics in German and Italian. Handout for presentation at the Workshop on Information Structure and the Architecture of grammar: A Typological Perspective, Tübigen, Germany, February 1-2, 2004.
31. Gill, K.-H., and G. Tsoulas. 2004. Peripheral effects without peripheral syntax: The left periphery in Korean. In Peripheries, ed. D. Adger, C. de Cat, and G. Tsoulas, 121-41. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
32. Green, G. 1976. Main clause phenomena in subordinate clauses. Language 52: 382-97.
33. Grewendorf, G. 2002. Left dislocation as movement. In Georgetown University working papers in theoretical linguistics, ed. S. Mauck and J. Mittelstaedt. Vol. 2, 31-81.
34. Grohmann, K. 2003. Prolific domains. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
35. Haegeman, L. 2000. Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP. In Transactions of the Philological Society. Specialissue: Papers from the Salford Negation Conference, ed. P. Rowlett. 98 (1), 121-60.
36. Haegeman, L. 2002. Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. In Georgetown University working papers in theoretical linguistics, ed. S. Mauck and J. Mittelstaedt. Vol. 2, 117-80.
37. Haegeman, L. 2003a. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 640-49.
38. Haegeman, L. 2003b. Speculations on adverbial fronting and the left periphery. In Temps et point de vue/Tense and point of view, ed. J. Guéron and L. Tasmowski, 329-65. Paris: Publidix, Université Paris X.
39. Heycock, C. 2002. Embedded root phenomena. Unpublished manuscript. University of Edinburgh.
40. Hirschbühler, P. 1997. On the source of lefthand NPs in French. In Materials on left dislocation, ed. E. Anagnostopoulou, H van Riemsdijk, and F. Zwarts, 55-66. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
41. Hooper, J., and S. Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465-97.
42. Hornstein, N. 1990. As time goes by. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
43. Koster, J. 1978. Why subject sentences don't exist. In Recent transformational studies in European languages, ed. J. Keyser, 53-64. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
44. Kuno, S. 1973. The structure of the Japanese language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
45. Laenzlinger, C., and J. Musolino. 1995. (Complex) inversion and triggers. GenGenP 3 (1): 77-96.
46. Lambrecht, K. 1981. Topic, antitopic and verb agreement in non-standard French. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Larson, R. K., and M. Sawada. Forthcoming. Presupposition and root transforms in adjunct clauses. In Proceedings of NELS 34, Ed. M. Wolf and K. Moulton. Amherst: GLSA, University of Massachusetts.
48. Lopez, L. 2003. Steps for a well-adjusted dislocation. Studia Linguistica 57: 193-232.
49. Lu, Peng. 2003. La subordination adverbiale en chinois contemporain. PhD diss., Université Paris VII.
50. Maki, H., L. Kaiser, and M. Ochi. 1999. Embedded topicalization in English and Japanese. Lingua 109: 1-14.
51. McCloskey, J. 2006. Questions and questioning in a local English, this volume.
52. Meinunger, A. 2000. Syntactic aspects of topic and comment. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
53. Meinunger, A. 2004. Verb Second in German(ic) and mood selection in Romance. Paper presented at the Workshop on Clause Typing and the Left Periphery. Georgetown University Round Table, Washington, D.C., March 29, 2004
54. Miller, P. 2001. Discourse constraints on (non) extraposition from subject in English. Linguistics 39: 683-701.
55. Munaro, N. 2004. Computational puzzles of conditional clause preposing. In UG and External Systems, ed. A. M. Di Sciullo, 73-95. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
56. Nilsen, Ø. 2004. Domains for adverbs. In Adverbs across frameworks, ed. A. Alexiadou, special issue, Lingua 114: 809-47.
57. Pereltsvaig, A. 2004. Topic and focus as linear notions: Evidence from Italian and Russian. In Focus and the interaction between syntax and pragmatics, guest ed. D. Bury, K. Froud, R. Horsey, and K. Szendroï, special issue, Lingua: 114: 325-44.
58. Platzack, C. 2004. Cross-linguistic word order variation at the left periphery: The case of object first main clauses. In Peripheries, ed. D. Adger, C. de Cat, and G. Tsoulas, 191-210. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
59. Quirk, R., S. Greenbaum, G. Leech, and J. Svartvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
60. Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of symbolic logic. New York: Free Press.
61. Rizzi, L. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of grammar, ed. L. Haegeman, 281-337. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
62. Rizzi, L. 2001. Locality and left periphery. Unpublished manuscript, University of Siena, Italy.
63. Roussou, A. 2000. On the left periphery. Modal particles and complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 65-94.
64. Rutherford, W. 1970. Some observations concerning subordinate clauses in English. Language 46: 97- 115.
65. Speas, M. 2004. Evidentiality, logophoricity and the syntactic representation of pragmatic features. Lingua 114: 255-77.
66. Sperber, D., and D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
67. Tellier, C. 2001. On some distinctive properties of parasitic gaps in French. In Parasitic gaps, ed. P. Culicover and P. Postal, 341-67. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
68. Tenny, C. 2000. Core events and adverbial modification. In Events as grammatical objects, ed. C. Tenny and J. Pustejovsky, 285-334. Stanford, CA: CSLI.
69. Verstraete, J.-C. 2002. Interpersonal grammar and clause combining in English. PhD diss., University of Leuven, Belgium.
70. Whitman, J. 1989. Topic, modality, and IP structure. In Proceedings of the third Harvard workshop on Korean linguistics, ed. S. Kuno et al. Seoul: Hanshin.
71. Wiltschko, M. 1997. Parasitic operators in German left-dislocation. In Materials on left dislocation, ed. E. Anagnostopoulou, H. van Riemsdijk, and F. Zwarts, 309-39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
72. Zubizaretta, M. L. 1998. Prosody, focus and word order. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
73. Zubizaretta, M. L. 2001. Preverbal subjects in Romance interrogatives. In Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of Universal Grammar, ed. A. Hulk and J.-Y. Pollock, 183-204. Oxford: Oxford University Press.