Operator movement and topicalisation in adverbial clauses

Folia Linguistica

Volumn 41, Issue 3-4, 2007, Pages 279-325

  Haegeman, Liliane ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE LILLE   (France)

^b UNIV LILLE   (France)

Author keywords

Adverbial clauses; Clitic left dislocation; Left periphery; Stylistic inversion; Topicalisation

Indexed keywords

EID: 39149145167     PISSN: 01654004     EISSN: 01654004     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/flin.41.3-4.279     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (85)

1. Baltin, Mark. 1985. Toward a theory of movement rules. New York: Garland.
2. Barbosa, Pilar. 2001. On inversion in WH-questions in Romance. In Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock, eds. Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 20-59.
3. Bayer, Joseph. 2001. Asymmetry in emphatic topicalisation. In Caroline Féry & Wolfgang Sternefeld, eds. Audiatur Vox Sapientiae. A Festschrift for Arnim von Stechow. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 15-47.
4. Bhatt, Rakesh M. & James Yoon. 1992. On the composition of COMP and parameters of V2. In Dawn Bates, ed. Proceedings of the 10th West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications, 41-52.
5. Bhatt, Rakesh M. & Roumyana Pancheva. 2006. Conditionals. In Everaert & van Riemsdijk, eds. Vol I: 638-687.
6. Browning, Maggie. 1996. CP recursion and that-t effects. Linguistic Inquiry 27: 237-255.
7. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1990. Types of A' dependencies. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
8. Cinque, Guglielmo. 1999. Adverbs and functional heads. A cross-linguistic perspective. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Cinque, Guglielmo. 2004. "Restructuring" and functional structure. In Adriana Belletti, ed. Structures and beyond. The cartography of syntactic structures, Vol III. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 132-191.
10. Culicover, Peter W. & Robert D. Levine. 2001. Stylistic inversion in English: A reconsideration. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 19:283-310.
11. Cummins, Sarah & Yves Roberge. 2005. A modular account of null objects in French. Syntax 8:44-65.
12. De Cat, Cecile. 2004. Dislocation without movement. In Benjamin Shaer, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn, eds. Proceedings of the Dislocated Elements Workshop, ZAS Berlin, November 2003. [ZAS Papers in Linguistics 35: 77-109].
13. Declerck, Renaat. 1991. Tense in English. London & New York: Routledge.
14. Declerck, Renaat & Use Depraetere. 1995. The double system of tense forms referring to future time in English. Journal of Semantics 12:269-310.
15. Delfitto, Dennis. 2002. On the semantics of pronominal clitics and some of its consequences. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 1:41-69.
16. Demirdache, Hamida & Myriam Uribe-Etxebarria. 2004. The syntax of time adverbs. In Guéron & Lecarme, eds. 143-180.
17. Desmets, Marianne. 2001. Les typages de la phrase en HPSG: Le cas des phrases en comme. Paris: Université Paris X doctoral dissertation.
18. Dikken, Marcel den & Anastasia Giannakidou. 2002. From hell to polarity: "Aggressively non-D-linked" Wh-phrases as polarity items. Linguistic Inquiry 33: 31-61.
19. Dubinsky, Stanley & Kemp Williams. 1995. Recategorisation of prepositions as complementizers: The case of temporal prepositions in English. Linguistic Inquiry 26: 125-137.
20. Everaert, Martin & Henk van Riemsdijk, eds. 2006. The Blackwell companion to syntax, 5 vols. Maiden, MA & Oxford: Blackwell.
21. Fintei, Kai Von & Sabine Iatridou. 2002. If and when if-clauses can restrict quantifiers. Ms. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
22. Fintel, Kai Von & Sabine Iatridou. 2003. Epistemic containment. Linguistic Inquiry 34:173-198.
23. Frascarelli, Maria & Roland Hinterhölzl. 2004. Types of topics in German and Italian. Paper presented at the workshop on Information structure and the architecture of grammar: A typological perspective, University of Tübingen, February 1st-2nd.
24. Geis, Michael. 1970. Adverbial subordinate clauses in English. Cambridge, MA: MIT PhD dissertation.
25. Geis, Michael. 1975. English time and place adverbiais. Ohio State University Working Papers in Linguistics 18:1-11.
26. Grewendorf, Günther. 2002. Left dislocation as movement. In Mauck & Mittelstaedt, eds. 31-81.
27. Grohmann, Kleanthes K. 2003. Prolific domains: On the anti-locality of movement dependencies. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
28. Guéron, Jacqueline & Jacqueline Lecarme, eds. The syntax of time. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
29. Haegeman, Liliane. 2000. Inversion, non-adjacent inversion and adjuncts in CP. In Paul Rowlett, ed. Papers from the Salford negation conference. [Special issue of Transactions of the Philological Society 98.1:121-160].
30. Haegeman, Liliane. 2002. Anchoring to speaker, adverbial clauses and the structure of CP. In Mauck & Mittelstaedt, eds. 117-180.
31. Haegeman, Liliane. 2003a. Conditional clauses: External and internal syntax. Mind and Language 18: 317-339.
32. Haegeman, Liliane. 2003b. Speculations on adverbial fronting and the left periphery. In Jacqueline Guéron & Liliane Tasmowski, eds. Temps et point de vue/Tense and point of view. Paris: Publidix, 329-365.
33. Haegeman, Liliane. 2003c. Notes on long adverbial fronting in English and the left periphery. Linguistic Inquiry 34: 640-649.
34. Haegeman, Liliane. 2006a. Conditional clauses and the syntax of adverbial clauses in English: Internal and external syntax. Paper presented at the Studiedag over conditionele zinnen [= 'Workshop on conditionals']. University of Leuven, Department of Linguistics.
35. Haegeman, Liliane. 2006b. Argument fronting in English, Romance CLLD and the left periphery. In Zanuttini, Campos, Herburger & Portner, eds. 27-52.
36. Haegeman, Liliane. 2008[1991]. Parenthetical adverbiais: The radical orphanage approach. In Benjamin Shaer, Philippa Cook, Werner Frey & Claudia Maienborn, eds. Dislocated elements in discourse: Syntactic, semantic, and pragmatic perspectives. London & New York: Routledge. [First published in Shuki Chiba, Akira Ogawa, Yasuaki Fuiwara, Norio Yamada, Osamu Koma & Takao Yagi, eds. 1991. Aspects of modern English linguistics: Papers presented to Masatomo Ukaji on his 60th birthday. Tokyo: Kaitakushi, 232-254].
37. Haegeman, Liliane. To appear. Evidential mood, restructuring, and the status of sembrare. In Paola Benincà & Nicola Munaro, eds. Mapping the left periphery. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press.
38. Holmberg, Anders. 2005. Is there a little pro? Evidence from Finnish. Linguistic Inquiry 37: 533-564.
39. Hooper, John & Sandra Thompson. 1973. On the applicability of root transformations. Linguistic Inquiry 4: 465-497.
40. Kayne, Richard S. 1984. Connectedness and binary branching. Dordrecht: Foris.
41. Kayne, Richard S. 1986. Connexité et inversion du sujet. In Mitsou Ronat & Daniel Couquaux, eds. La grammaire modulaire. Paris: Editions de Minuit, 127-147.
42. Kayne, Richard S. 1994. The antisymmetry of syntax. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
43. Kayne, Richard S. 2000. Null subjects and clitic climbing. In Richard S. Kayne, Parameters and universals. Oxford & New York: Oxford University Press, 40-59.
44. [First published in Osvaldo Jaeggli & Kenneth J. Safir, eds. 1989. The Null Subject Parameter. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 239-261].
45. Kayne, Richard S. & Jean Yves Pollock. 2001. New thoughts on stylistic inversion. In Aafke Hulk & Jean-Yves Pollock, eds. Subject inversion in Romance and the theory of universal grammar. New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press, 107-162.
46. Kortmann, Bernd. 1998. Adverbial subordinators in the languages of Europe. In Johan van der Auwera, ed. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter, 457-561.
47. Laenzlinger, Christopher & Julien Musolino. 1995. (Complex) Inversion and triggers. Geneva Generative Papers 3: 77-96.
48. Lahousse, Karen. 2003a. The distribution of postverbal nominal subjects in French. A syntactic, semantic and pragmatic analysis. Leuven: University of Leuven doctoral dissertation.
49. Lahousse, Karen. 2003b. La distribution de l'inversion nominale en français dans les principales non interrogatives et les subordonnées circonstancielles. Linguisticae Investigationes 26:101-136.
50. Larson, Richard K. 1985. On the syntax of disjunction scope. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 3:217-264.
51. Larson, Richard K. 1987. "Missing prepositions" and the analysis of English free relative clauses. Linguistic Inquiry 18:239-266.
52. Larson, Richard K. 1988. On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-392.
53. Larson, Richard K. 1990. Extraction and multiple selection in PP. The Linguistic Review 7:169-182.
54. Le Bidois, Robert. 1952. L'inversion de sujet dans la prose contemporaine (1900-1950). Paris: Editions d'Artrey.
55. Maki, Hideki, Lizanne Kaiser & Masao Ochi. 1999. Embedded topicalisation in English and Japanese. Lingua 109:1-14.
56. Mann, Gerd. 1939. Konjunktionen und Modus in konsekutiven und finalen Nebensatz des Altenglischen. Breslau: Priebatsch.
57. Mauck, Simon & Jenny Mittelstaedt, eds. Proceedings of the Workshop on the Syntax-Semantics Interface in the CP-domain. [Georgetown University Working Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 2].
58. McCloskey, James. 2006. Questions and questioning in a local English. In Zanurtini, Campos, Herburger & Portner, eds. 87-126.
59. Mitchell, Bruce. 1985. Old English syntax, 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
60. Muller, Claude. 1994. Combien faut-il distinguer de si? In Amr Ibrahim Helmy, ed. Supports, opérateurs, durées. (Annales Littéraires de l'Université de Besançon 516). Paris: Les Belles Lettres, 185-206.
61. Penner, Zvi & Thomas Bader. 1995. Issues in the syntax of subordination: A comparative study of the complementizer system in Germanic, Romance, and Semitic languages with special reference to Bernese Swiss German. In Zvi Penner, ed. Topics in Swiss German syntax. Bern: Peter Lang, 73-290.
62. Platzack, Christer. 2004. Cross-linguistic word order variation at the left periphery: The case of Object First main clauses. In David Adger, Cécile De Cat & George Tsoulas, eds. Peripheries: Syntactic edges and their effects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 191-210.
63. Prince, Ellen F. 1981. Topicalization, Focus-Movement, and Yiddish-Movement: A pragmatic differentiation. In Danny K. Alford, Karen Ann Hunold, Monica A. Macaulay, Jenny Walter, with Claudia Brugman, Paula Chertok, Inese Civkulis & Marta Tobey, eds. Proceedings of the Seventh Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Berkeley Linguistics Society, 249-264.
64. Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech & Jan Svarrvik. 1985. A comprehensive grammar of the English language. London: Longman.
65. Riemsdijk, Henk van. 2006. Free relatives. In Everaert & van Riemsdijk, eds. Vol II: 339-380.
66. Rizzi, Luigi. 1990. Relativized minimality. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
67. Rizzi, Luigi. 1997. The fine structure of the left periphery. In Liliane Haegeman, ed. Elements of grammar. Dordrecht: Kluwer, 281-337.
68. Rizzi, Luigi. 2001. Relativized minimality effects. In Mark Baltin & Chris Collins, eds. The handbook of contemporary syntactic theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 89-110.
69. Roberts, Ian & Anna Roussou. 2003. Syntactic change: A minimalist approach to grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
70. Roussou, Anna. 2000. On the left periphery. Modal particles and complementizers. Journal of Greek Linguistics 1: 65-94.
71. Sawada, Miyuki & Richard K. Larson. 2004. Presupposition and root transforms in adjunct clauses. In Keir Moulton & Matthew Wolf, eds. Proceedings of NELS 34. UMass Amherst: GLSA, 517-528.
72. Schlenker, Philippe. 2001. A referential analysis of conditionals. Ms. Cambridge, MA: MIT.
73. Small, George William. 1924. The comparison of inequality: The semantics and syntax of the comparative particle in English. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
74. Sobin, Nicholas. 2003. Negative inversion as nonmovement. Syntax 6:183-212.
75. Sperber, Dan & Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.
76. Stowell, Tim. 2004. Tense and modals. In Guéron & Lecarme, eds. 621-636.
77. Tenny, Carol. 2000. Core events and adverbial modification. In Carol Tenny & James Pustejovsky, eds. Events as grammatical objects. The converging perspectives of lexical semantics and syntax. Stanford: CSLI Publications, 285-334.
78. Traugott, Elizabeth Closs & Ekkehard König. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott & Bernd Heine, eds. Approaches to grammaticalization. Vol. I. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 189-218.
79. Verstraete, Jean-Christophe. 2002. Interpersonal grammar and clause combining in English. Leuven: University of Leuven doctoral dissertation.
80. Ward, Gregory. 1988. The semantics and pragmatics of preposing. (Outstanding Dissertations in Linguistics). New York: Garland.
81. Whitman, John. 1989. Topic, modality, and IP structure. In Susumu Kuno et al., eds. Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics III (Proceedings of the 1989 Harvard Workshop on Korean Linguistics). Seoul: Hanshin, 341-356.
82. Zanuttini, Raffaella & Paul H. Portner. 2003. Exclamative clauses: At the syntax-semantics interface. Language 79: 39-81.
83. Zanuttini, Raffaella, Héctor Campos, Elena Herburger & Paul H. Portner, eds. 2006. Cross-linguistic research in syntax and semantics: Negation, tense and clausal architecture. Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
84. Zribi-Hertz, Anne. 1984. Prépositions orphelines et pronoms nuls. Recherches Linguistiques de Vincennes 12: 46-91.
85. Zribi-Hertz, Anne & Lamine Diagne. 2003. Déficience flexionnelle et temps topical en wolof. In Patrick Sauzet & Anne Zribi-Hertz, eds. Typologie des langues d'Afrique et universaux de la grammaire, Vol. II: Benue-Kwa; wolof. Paris: L'Harmattan, 205-231.