Romanian adverbs and the pragmatic field

Linguistic Review

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 61-86

  Hill, Virginia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW BRUNSWICK   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547534712     PISSN: 01676318     EISSN: 16133676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/TLR.2007.003     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Alboiu, Gabriela (2002). The Features of Movement in Romanian. Bucharest: EUB.
2. _ (2005). When CP domains are pro-Case. http://www.yorku.ca/galboiu/ documents/
3. Chomsky, Noam (1995). The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. _ (2001). Derivation by phase. In Ken Hale: A Life in Language, Michael Kenstowicz (ed.), 1-52. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Cinque, Guglielmo (1999). Adverbs and Functional Heads. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Cornilescu, Alexandra (2000). The double subject construction in Romanian. In Comparative Studies in Romanian Syntax, V. Motapanyane (ed.), 83-134. Oxford: Elsevier.
7. Croitor-Balaciu, Blanca (2006). Interjecţia. In Grammatica Limbii Române, ICL (eds.), 126-132. Bucharest: Editura Academiei.
8. Sciullo, Anne-Marie (2004). Asymmetry in Morphology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Dobrovie-Sorin, Carmen (1994). The Syntax of Romanian. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
10. Farkaş, Donka (1985). Intensional Descriptions and the Romance Subjunctive Mood. New York: Garland.
11. Gramatica Limbii Române (1963). Bucharest: Editura Academiei.
12. Hill, Virginia (2002). Complementizer phrases in Romanian. Rivista di Linguistica 14 (2): 223-248.
13. _ (2006). Stylistic inversion in Romanian. Studia Linguistica 60 (2): 156-180.
14. Kayne, Richard (1994). The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Larson, Richard (1988). On the double object construction. Linguistic Inquiry 19: 335-391.
16. Masullo, Pascual (2005). The sytax-pragmatic interface: Licensing adjoined CP in Spanish. Paper presented at LSRL 35, University of Texas/Austin.
17. Munakata, Takashi (2006). The division of C-I and the nature of the input, multiple transfer, and phases. http://www.punksinscience.org/kleanthes/ InterPhases
18. Pîrvulescu, Mihaela (2002). Le concept de paradigme et la morphologie verbale. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Toronto.
19. Poletto, Cecilia (2000) The Higher Functional Field. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Rizzi, Luigi (1997). The fine structure of the left periphery. In Elements of Grammar: Handbook of Generative Syntax, Liliane Haegeman (ed.), 281-339. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
21. _ (2004). Locality and left periphery. In Structures and Beyond. The Cartography of Syntactic Structures, vol. 3, Adriana Belletti (ed.), 281-339. New York: Oxford University Press.
22. Roberts, Ian and Anna Roussou (2003). Syntactic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Ross, John (1970). On declarative sentences. In Readings in English Transformational Grammar, R. A. Jacobs and P. S. Rosenbaum. (eds.), 63-81. Waltham, MA: Ginn.
24. Speas, Margaret and Carol Tenny (2003). Configurational properties of point of view roles. In Asymmetry in Grammar, Anne-Marie Di Sciullo (ed.), 315-344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
25. Tenny, Carol (2005). Predicate-argument structure and the grammar of sentience. Paper presented at workshop on "The Form and Interpretation of Argument Structure", LSA Summer Institute, July 1, Boston, MA: Harvard University.
26. Teodorescu, Ecaterina (1972). Propoziţia Subiectivǎ. Bucharest: Editura Ştiinţificǎ.