Taking universal perspective in design: A plea for two reflective principles and mechanisms

Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Yetim, Fahri ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SIEGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN PROCESS; DYNAMIC BEHAVIORS; GLOBAL CONTEXT; HUMAN VALUES; INTERACTION CONTEXT; INTERACTIVE SYSTEM; MACHINE INTELLIGENCE; META-COMMUNICATION; SYSTEM BEHAVIORS;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

MACHINE DESIGN;

EID: 77951715631     PISSN: 15301605     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/HICSS.2010.361     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (50)

1. Ackerman, M. (2002). "The Intellectual Challenge of CSCW: The Gap Between Social Requirements and Technical Feasibility," Human-Computer Interaction (15), pp. 179-203
2. Argyris, C. and D.A Schön (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
3. Arias, E., H. Eden, G. Fischer, A. Gorman, and E. Scharff (2000). "Transcending the individual human mind - creating shared understanding through collaborative design," ACM transactions on Human Computer interaction (7)1, pp. 84-113.
4. Awad, N. F. and M.S. Krishnan (2006). "The Personalization Privacy Paradox: an Empirical Evaluation of Information Transparency and the Willingness to be Profiled Online for Personalization," MIS Quarterly (30)1, pp. 13-28.
5. Brusilovsky, P., A. Kobsa, and W. Neidl (2007)(eds.). The Adaptive Web: Methods and Strategies of Web Personalization. Lecture Notes in Computer Science. Berlin et al: Springer-Verlag.
6. Brusilovsky, P. (2003). "Adaptive Navigation Support in Educational Hypermedia: the Role of Student Knowledge Level and the Case for Meta-Adaptation," British Journal of Educational Technology (34)4, pp. 487-497
7. Clyne, M. (1994). Inter-cultural Communication at Work: Cultural Values in Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
8. De Assis, P.S., D. Schwabe, D.A. Nunes (2006). "ASHDM - Model-Driven Adaptation and Meta-Adaptation" In Proceedings of Adaptive Hypermedia Conference, pp. 213-222.
9. De Bra, P., Aerts, A., Smits, D., and Stash, N. (2002). AHA! Version 2.0: More Adaptation Flexibility for Authors. In: M. Driscoll and T. C. Reeves (eds.) Proceedings of World Conference on E-Learning, Montreal, Canada, October 15-19, 2002, AACE, pp. 240-246.
10. De Souza, C. S. (2005). The Semiotic Engineering of Human-Computer Interaction. MIT Press.
11. Dourish, P. (1995). "Developing a Reflective Model of Collaborative Systems," ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (2)1, pp. 40-63.
12. Earthy J, B. Sherwood Jones B., and N. Bevan (2001). "The Improvement of Human-Centred Processes - facing the challenge and reaping the benefit of ISO 13407," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (55)4, pp. 553-585.
13. Fischer, G., E. Giaccardi, Y. Ye, A.G. Sutcliffe, and N. Mehandjiev (2004) "Meta-design: A manifesto for end-user development," Communications of the ACM (47)9 pp. 33-37.
14. Fischer, G., Giaccardi, E., Eden, H., Sugimoto, M., and Ye, Y. (2005). Beyond Binary Choices: Integrating Individual and Social Creativity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (IJHCS) Special Issue on Computer Support for Creativity (E.A. Edmonds & L. Candy, Eds.), 63(4-5), pp. 482-512. (Pubitemid 41261284)
15. Friedman, B. (1997)(Ed.). Human Values and the Design of Computer Technology. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gasson, S. (2003). Human-centered vs. User-centered Approaches to Information Systems Design. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application (JITTA), 5(2), pp. 29-46.
17. Germonprez, M., D. Hovorka, and F. Collopy (2007). "A Theory of Tailorable Technology," Journal of Association for Information Systems (8)6, pp. 351-367.
18. Grice, H.P. (1975). "Logic and conversation," In: P. Cole and J. Morgan (Eds.): Syntax and Semantics, 3, New York, NY: Academic Press, pp. 41-58.
19. Grigoriadou, M., Papanikolaou, K., Kornilakis, H., Magoulas, G. INSPIRE: An Intelligent System for Personalized Instruction in a Remote Environment, 8th International Conference on User Modeling (UM2001), Third Workshop on Adaptive Hypertext and Hypermedia, Germany, 2001
20. Habermas, J. (1993). Justification and Application. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
21. Habermas, J. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action: Reason and the Rationalization of Society. Boston, MA: Beacon Press. (Vol. I).
22. He, J. and Kind, W.R. (2008). "The Role of User Participation in Information Systems Development: Implications from a Meta-Analysis," Journal of management Information Systems 25(1), pp. 301-331.
23. Hofstede, G. (1984). Culture's Consequences. New York, NY: Sage.
24. Jameson, A. and B. Smyth (2007). "Recommendation to Groups," In: P. Brusilovsky, A. Kobsa, and W. Nejdl (Eds.), The adaptive web: Methods and strategies of web personalization. Berlin: Springer, pp. 596-627.
25. Klein, H. and R. Hirschheim (2001). "Choosing Between Competing Design Ideals in Information Systems Development," Information Systems Frontiers 2, pp. 75-90. (Pubitemid 33277065)
26. Kobsa, A. (2007). "Privacy-enhanced Personalization," Communications of the ACM (50)8, pp.24-33.
27. Kumar, K. and N. Bjorn-Andersen (1990). A cross-cultural comparison of IS designer values. Communications of the ACM (33)5, pp. 528-538.
28. Lieberman, H., F. Paternò, and V. Wulf (2006). End User Development. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
29. Leidner, D.E. and T. Kayworth (2006). "Review: A Review of Culture in Information Systems Research: Toward a Theory of Information Technology Culture Conflict," MIS Quarterly (30)2, pp. 357-399.
30. Mark, G. (2002). "Conventions and Commitments in Distributed CSCW Groups," Computer Supported Cooperative Work (11)3-4, pp. 349-387.
31. Markus, L.. and Mao, J-Y. (2004). "Participation in development and implementation - updating an old, tired concept for today's IS contexts," Journal of the Association for Information Systems 5(11-12), pp. 514-544.
32. Mumford, E. (1983). Designing Participatively, Manchester Business School, Manchester,
33. Nichols, D.M.; McKay, D. and Twidale, M.B. (2003) Participatory Usability: Supporting Proactive Users. Proceedings of the 4th Annual Conference of the ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Human Interaction - New Zealand Chapter (CHINZ'03), pp. 63-68.
34. Orlikowski, W. and Yates, J. (1994). "Genre Repertoire: Examining the Structuring of Communicative Practices in Organizations," Administrative Science Quarterly 39, pp.541-574.
35. Paramythis, A. (2006). Self-regulated adaptivity as a design and authoring support tool. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Authoring of Adaptive and Adaptable Hypermedia (A3H) held in conjunction with the Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems 2006 Conference (AH 2006), June 21-23, 2006, Dublin, Ireland.
36. Preece, J. and Y. Rogers, and H. Sharp (2002). Interaction Design. Beyond Human-Computer Interaction. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
37. Schneider-Hufschmidt, M., T. Kuehme, and U. Malinowski (1993)(Eds.). Adaptive User Interfaces, Elsevier.
38. Sheng, H., F. Nah, and K. Siau (2008). "An Experimental Study on Ubiquitous Commerce Adoption: Impact of Personalization and Privacy Concerns," Journal of the Association for Information Systems (9)6, pp. 344-376.
39. Shneiderman, B. (2000). "Universal Usability," Communications of the ACM 5, pp. 84-91.
40. rd ACM International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces.
41. Stevens, G. and T. Wiedenhöfer (2006). CHIC - a pluggable solution for community help in context. Proceedings of NORDICHI'06, 212-221. (Pubitemid 47112332)
42. Te'eni, D. (2006). "The Language-Action Perspective as a Basis for Communication Support Systems," Communications of the ACM (49) 5, pp.65-70. (Pubitemid 44046405)
43. Wagner, E.L. and Newell, S. (2007). Exploring the Importance of Participation in the Post-Implementation Period of an ES Project: A neglected Area," Journal of the Association for Information Systems 8(1), pp. 508-524.
44. Winograd, T. and F. Flores (1986). Understanding Computers and Cognition; a New Foundation for Design. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.
45. Wulf, V., V. Pipek, and M. Won (2007). "Component-based Tailorability: Enabling Highly Flexible Software Applications," International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (66)1, pp. 1-22.
46. Yetim, F. (2009). A Deliberation Theory-Based Approach to the Management of Usability Guidelines. Informing Science Journal 12 (2009), pp. 73-104. Available: http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol12/ISJv12p073-104Yetim519.pdf
47. Yetim, F. (2008). Critical Examination of Information: A Discursive Approach and its Implementations. Informing Science, 11, pp. 125-146. Available: http://inform.nu/Articles/Vol11/ISJv11p125-146Yetim212.pdf
48. Yetim, F. (2006). .,Acting with Genres: Discursive- Ethical Concepts for Reflecting on and Legitimating Genres," European Journal of Information Systems 15(1), pp. 54-69.
49. Yetim, F. (2004). "Universal Actability: Towards an integral Understanding of Universal Usability, (Intercultural) Action Competence, and Information Systems Actability," In: Proceedings of Language-Action Perspective on Communication Modeling.
50. Yetim, F. (1998). "Interkulturalität und Informatische Gestaltung - Eine Interdisziplinäre Annäherung," Informatik-Spektrum 21, pp. 203-212.