Two bases of the compatibility effect in the Implicit Association Test (IAT)

Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 59, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 2102-2120

  Kinoshita, Sachiko ^a   Peek O'Leary, Marie ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; PERSONALITY TEST; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TOUCH; VISION;

HUMANS; REACTION TIME; SEMANTICS; TOUCH; VISUAL PERCEPTION; WORD ASSOCIATION TESTS;

EID: 33750919480     PISSN: 17470218     EISSN: 17470226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17470210500451141     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Balota, D. A., & Chumbley, J. I. (1984). Are lexical decisions a good measure of lexical access? The role of word frequency in the neglected decision stage. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 340-357.
2. Brendl, C. M., Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760-773.
3. Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2003). Stimulus and response representation underlying orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility effects. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10, 45-73.
4. Cho, Y. S., & Proctor, R. W. (2005). Representing response position relative to display location: Influence on orthogonal stimulus-response compatibility. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58A, 839-864.
5. Clark, E. V. (1973). What's in a word? On the child's acquisition of semantics in his first language. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 65-110). New York: Academic Press.
6. Clark, H. H. (1973). Space, time, semantics, and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and the acquisition of language (pp. 27-63). New York: Academic Press.
7. Forster, K. I., & Forster, J. C. (2003). DMDX: A windows display program with millisecond accuracy. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 35, 116-124.
8. Gladwell, M. (2005). Blink: The power of thinking without thinking. New York: Penguin.
9. Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
10. Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M. R., & Klauer, K. C. (2005). Validity of the salience asymmetry interpretation of the IAT: Comment on Rothermund and Wentura (2004). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 420-425.
11. Hansen, C. H., & Hansen, R.D. (1988). Finding the face in the crowd: An anger superiority effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 917-924.
12. Hines, T. M. (1990). An odd effect: Lengthened reaction times for judgments about odd digits. Memory & Cognition, 18, 40-46.
13. Kinoshita, S., & Peek-O'Leary, M. (2005). Does the compatibility effect in the race Implicit Association Test (IAT) reflect familiarity or affect? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 442-452.
14. Klauer, K. C., & Mierke, J. (2005). Task-set inertia,-attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account for the IAT effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 208-217.
15. Kucera, H., & Francis, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
16. Lochy, A., Seron, X., Delazer, M., & Butterworth, B. (2000). The odd-even effect in multiplication: Parity rule or familiarity with even numbers? Memory & Cognition, 28, 358-365.
17. Lyons, J. (1969). Semantics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
18. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics I. London: Cambridge University Press.
19. Mierke, J., & Klauer, K. C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107-122.
20. Mitchell, C. J. (2004). Mere acceptance produces apparent attitude in the Implicit Association Test (IAT). Journal of Experimental and Social Psychology, 40, 366-373.
21. Nosek, B. A., Banaji, M., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Harvesting implicit group attitudes and beliefs from a demonstration web site. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, & Practice, 6, 101-115.
22. Nuerk, H.-C., Iversen, W., & Willmes, K. (2004). Notational modulation of the SNARC and the MARC (linguistic markedness of response codes) effect. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57A, 853-863.
23. Ohman, A., Lundqvist, D., & Esteves, F. (2001). The face in the crowd revisited: A threat advantage with schematic stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 381-396.
24. Reynvoet, B., & Brysbaert, M. (1999). Single-digit and two-digit arabic numerals address the same number line. Cognition, 72, 191-201.
25. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2001). Figur-grund asymmetrien im Implicit Association Test (IAT). Zeitschrift fur Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 94-106.
26. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139-165.
27. Rothermund, K., Wentura, D., & De Houwer, J. (2005). Validity of salience asymmetry account of the IAT: Reply to Greenwald, Nosek, Banaji and Klauer (2005). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 426-430.
28. Strayer, D. L., & Johnston, W. A. (2000). Novel popout is an attention-based phenomenon: An ERP analysis. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 459-470.
29. Tipples, J., Young, A. W., Quinlan, P., Broks, P., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). Searching for threat. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55A, 1007-1026.
30. Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., & Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 495-500.
31. Whaley, C. P. (1978). Word-nonword classification time. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 17, 143-154.
32. Willmes, K., & Iversen, W. (1995, April). On the internal representation of number parity. Paper presented at the Spring Annual General Meeting of the British Neuropsychological Society, London, UK.