Minimizing method-specific variance in the IAT: A single block IAT

European Journal of Psychological Assessment

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 237-245

  Teige Mocigemba, Sarah ^a   Klauer, Karl Christoph ^a   Rothermund, Klaus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b FRIEDRICH SCHILLER UNIVERSITY JENA   (Germany)

Author keywords

Implicit association test; Method specific variance; Recording; Speed accuracy trade offs; Task switching processes

Indexed keywords

EID: 55949134311     PISSN: 10155759     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/1015-5759.24.4.237     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Back, M.D., Schmukle, S.C., & Egloff, B. (2005). Measuring task-switching ability in the Implicit Association Test. Experimental Psychology, 52, 167-179.
2. Conrey, F.R., Sherman, J.W., Gawronski, B., Hugenberg, K., & Groom, C. (2005). Separating multiple processes in implicit social cognition: The quad-model of implicit task performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 469-487.
3. De Houwer, J. (2003). The extrinsic affective Simon task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85.
4. De Houwer, J., Geldof, T., & De Bruycker, E. (2005). The Implicit Association Test as a general measure of similarity. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 59, 228-239.
5. Eichstaedt, J. (2007). Choice prediction with a balanced IAT. Unpublished manuscript, Helmut Schmidt University, Hamburg.
6. Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175-191.
7. Fazio, R.H., & Olson, M.A. (2003). Implicit measures in social cognition research: Their meaning and use. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 297-327.
8. Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G.V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: An integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychological Bulletin, 132, 692-731.
9. Govan, C.L., & Williams, K.D. (2004). Changing the affective valence of the stimulus items influences the IAT by redefining the category labels. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40, 357-365.
10. Greenwald, A.G., McGhee, D.E., & Schwartz, J.L.K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
11. Greenwald, A.G., Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
12. Greenwald, A.G., Poehlman, T.A., Uhlmann, E., & Banaji, M.R. (in press). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.
13. Inquisit 2.0.50401 [Computer software]. (2005). Seattle, WA: Millisecond Software LLC.
14. Klauer, K.C., & Mierke, J. (2005). Task-set inertia, attitude accessibility, and compatibility-order effects: New evidence for a task-set switching account of the IAT effect. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 208-217.
15. Klauer, K.C., Voss, A., Schmitz, F., & Teige-Mocigemba, S. (2007). Process components of the Implicit Association Test: A diffusion-model analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 353-368.
16. McFarland, S.G., & Crouch, Z. (2002). A cognitive skill confound on the Implicit Association Test. Social Cognition, 20, 483-510.
17. Meiran, N. (1996). Reconfiguration of processing mode prior to task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 1423-1442.
18. Mierke, J., & Klauer, K.C. (2001). Implicit association measurement with the IAT: Evidence for effects of executive control processes. Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie, 48, 107-122.
19. Mierke, J., & Klauer, K.C. (2003). Method-specific variance in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 1180-1192.
20. Nosek, B.A., & Banaji, M.R. (2001). The go/no-go association task. Social Cognition, 19, 625-666.
21. Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (2005). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: II. Method variables and construct validity. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 166-180.
22. Nosek, B.A., Greenwald, A.G., & Banaji, M.R. (2006). The Implicit Association Test at age 7: A methodological and conceptual review. In J.A. Bargh (Ed.), Social psychology and the unconscious: The automaticity of higher mental processes (pp. 265-292). New York: Psychology Press.
23. Olson, M.A., & Fazio, R.H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extra-personal associations on the Implicit Association Test: Personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 653-667.
24. Rogers, R., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
25. Rothermund, K., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Gast, A., & Wentura, D. (in press). Minimizing the influence of receding in the Implicit Association Test: The Recoding-Free Implicit Association Test (IAT-RF). Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology.
26. Rothermund, K., & Wentura, D. (2004). Underlying processes in the Implicit Association Test (IAT): Dissociating salience from associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133, 139-165.
27. Schnabel, K., Asendorpf, J.B., & Greenwald, A.G. (2008). Assessment of individual differences in implicit cognition: A review of IAT measures. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 25, 210-217.
28. Strayer, D.L., & Kramer, A.F. (1994). Strategies and automaticity: I. Basic findings and conceptual framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 318-341.
29. Teige, S., Schnabel, K., Banse, R., & Asendorpf, J.B. (2004). Assessment of multiple implicit self-concept dimensions using the extrinsic affective Simon task (EAST). European Journal of Personality, 18, 495-520.
30. Tukey, J.W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
31. Wentura, D., & Rothermund, K. (2007). Paradigms we live by. A plea for more basic research on the IAT. In B. Wittenbrink & N. Schwarz (Eds.), Implicit measures of attitudes (pp. 195-215). New York: Guilford.