A Continuous-state coalescent and the impact of weak selection on the structure of gene genealogies

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1162-1172

  O'Fallon, Brendan D ^a   Seger, Jon ^b   Adler, Frederick R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Coalescent; Gene genealogies; Interference; Multisite selection; Weak selection

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTINUOUS STATE COALESCENT; FITNESS; GENE GENEALOGY; GENEALOGY; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HERITABILITY; HUMAN; NATURAL SELECTION; PARAMETER; POPULATION GENETICS; POPULATION SIZE; VARIANCE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENES; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; SELECTION, GENETIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 77951561582     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msq006     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Azzalini A. 1985. A class of distributions which includes the normal ones. Scand J Stat. 12:171-178.
2. Barton N, Etheridge AM. 2004. The effect of selection on genealogies. Genetics 166:1115-1131.
3. Barton N, Etheridge AM, Sturm AK. 2004. Coalescence in a random background. Ann Appl Probab. 14:754-778.
4. Barton N, Navarro A. 2002. Extending the coalescent to multilocus systems: the case of balancing selection. Genet Res. 79:129-139.
5. Barton NH, Wilson I. 1996. Genealogies and geography. Philos Transact B Biol Sci. 349:49-59.
6. Charlesworth B, Morgan MT, Charlesworth D. 1993. The effect of deleterious mutations on neutral molecular variation. Genetics 134:1289-1303.
7. Comeron, JM, Kreitman M. 2002. Population, evolutionary, and ge-nomic consequences of interference selection. Genetics 161:389-410.
8. Comeron JM, Williford A, Kliman RM. 2008. The Hill-Robertson effect: evolutionary consequences of weak selection and linkage in finite populations. Heredity 100:19-31.
9. Coop G, Griffiths R. 2004. Ancestral inference on gene trees under selection. Theor Popul Biol. 66(3):219-232.
10. Drummond AJ, Rambaut A. 2007. BEAST: Bayesian evolutionary analysis by sampling trees. BMC Evol Biol. 7:214.
11. Fisher RA. 1931. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Golding B. 1997. The effect of purifying selection on genealogies. In: Donnelly P, Tavare S, editors. Progress in population genetics and human evolution. New York: Springer-Verlag.
13. Hudson R, Kaplan N. 1994. Gene trees with background selection. In: Golding B, editor. Non-neutral evolution, theories and molecular data. New York: Chapman & Hall.
14. Hudson R, Kaplan N. 1995. Deleterious background selection with recombination. Genetics 141:1605-1617.
15. Kaplan N, Darden T, Hudson RB. 1988. The coalescent process in models with selection. Genetics 120:819-829.
16. Kingman JFC. 1982a. Exchangeability and the evolution of large populations. In: Koch G, Spizzino F, editors. Exchangeability in probability and statistics. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
17. Kingman JFC. 1982b. On the genealogy of large populations. J. Appl. Probab. 19A:27-43.
18. Kingman JFC. 1982c. The coalescent. Stochastic Processes Appl. 13:235-248.
19. Krone SM, Neuhauser C. 1997. Ancestral processes with selection. Theor Popul Biol. 51:210-237.
20. Kuhner MK. 2006. LAMARC 2.0: maximum likelihood and Bayesian estimation of population parameters. Bioinformatics 22(6): 768-770.
21. Kuhner MK, Yamato J, Felsenstein J. 1998. Maximum likelihood estimation of population growth rates based on the coalescent. Genetics 149(1):429-434.
22. Maia L, Colato A, Fontanari JF. 2004. Effect of selection on the topology of genealogical trees. J Theor Biol. 226:315-320.
23. McVean GAT, Charlesworth B. 2000. The effects of Hill-Robertson interference between weakly selected mutations on patterns of molecular evolution and variation. Genetics 155:929-944.
24. Minin V, Bloomquist EW, Suchard MA. 2008. Smooth skyride through a rough skyline: Bayesian coalescent-based inference of population dynamics. Mol Biol Evol. 25(7):1459-1471.
25. Navarro A, Barton N. 2002. The effects of multilocus balancing selection on neutral variability. Genetics 161:849-863. (Pubitemid 34705423)
26. Neuhauser C, Krone SM. 1997. The genealogy of samples in models with selection. Genetics 145:519-534.
27. Nordborg M. 1997. Structured coalescent processes on different timescales. Genetics 146:1501-1514.
28. Przeworski M, Charlesworth B, Wall JD. 1999. Genealogies and weak purifying selection. Mol Biol Evol. 16(2):246-252.
29. Pybus O, Rambaut A, Harvey P. 2000. An integrated framework for the inference of viral population history from reconstructed genealogies. Genetics 155:1429-1437.
30. Rouzine IM, Wakeley J, Coffin JM. 2003. The solitary wave of asexual evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 100(2):587-592.
31. Seger J, Smith WA, Perry JJ, Hunn J, Kaliszewska ZA, Sala LL, Pozzi L, Rowntree V, Adler FR. 2010. Gene genealogies strongly distorted by weakly interfering mutations in constant environments. Genetics 184:529-545.
32. Skellam JG. 1946. The frequency distribution of the difference between two Poisson variates belonging to different populations. J Roy Stat Soc Ser A. 109(3):296.
33. Slade PF. 2000. Simulation of selected geneaologies. Theor Popul Biol. 57:35-49.
34. Strimmer K, Pybus O. 2001. Exploring the demographic history of DNA sequences using the generalized skyline plot. Mol Biol Evol. 18:2298-2305.
35. Wakeley J. 2001. The coalescent in an island model of subdivision with variation among demes. Theor Popul Biol. 59:133-144.
36. Wakeley J. 2008. Conditional gene genealogies under strong purifying selection. Mol Biol Evol. 25(12):2615-2626.
37. Wilkins JF. 2004. A separation of timescales approach to the coalescent in a continuous population. Genetics 168:2227-2244.
38. Wilkins JF, Wakeley J. 2002. The coalescent in a continuous, finite, linear population. Genetics 161:873-888.
39. Williamson S, Orive ME. 2002. The genealogy of a sequence subject to purifying selection at multiple sites. Mol Biol Evol. 19(8): 1376-1384.