Effect of selection on the topology of genealogical trees

Journal of Theoretical Biology

Volumn 226, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 315-320

  Maia, Leonardo P ^a   Colato, Alexandre ^a   Fontanari, José F ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Balance measures; Branching patterns; Genealogical tree; Moran model; Multiplicative fitness landscape; Neutrality tests

Indexed keywords

GENEALOGY; SELECTION; TOPOLOGY;

ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BRANCHING MORPHOGENESIS; GENE MUTATION; GENEALOGY; GENETIC SELECTION; POPULATION GENETICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; SAMPLE SIZE; TAXONOMIC IDENTIFICATION; TREE;

EID: 0345688143     PISSN: 00225193     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2003.09.005     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Campos P.R.A., Sonoda M.T., Fontanari J.F. On the structure of genealogical trees in the presence of selection. Physica A. 283:2000;11-16.
2. Colless D.H. Review of phylogenetics. the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics Syst. Zool. 31:1982;100-104.
3. Crow J.F., Kimura M. An Introduction to Population Genetics Theory. 1970;Harper & Row, New York.
4. Derrida B., Peliti L. Evolution in a flat fitness landscape. Bull. Math. Biol. 53:1991;355-382.
5. Ewens W.J. Mathematical Population Genetics. 1979;Springer, Berlin.
6. Fu Y.X., Li W.H. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations. Genetics. 133:1993;693-709.
7. Fu Y.X., Li W.H. Coalescing into the 21st century. an overview and prospects of coalescent theory Theor. Popul. Biol. 56:1999;1-10.
8. Fusco G., Cronk Q.C.B. A new method for evaluating the shape of large phylogenies. J. Theor. Biol. 175:1995;235-243.
9. Golding G.B. The effect of purifying selection on genealogies. Donnelly P., Tavaré S. Progress in Population Genetics and Human Evolution. 1997;271-285 Springer, New York.
10. Haigh J. The accumulation of deleterious genes in a population - Muller's ratchet. Theor. Popul. Biol. 14:1978;251-267.
11. Harvey P.H., Leigh Brown A.J., Maynard Smith J., Nee S. New Uses for New Phylogenies. 1996;Oxford University Press, Oxford.
12. Higgs P.G., Derrida B. Genetic distance and species formation in evolving populations. J. Mol. Evol. 35:1992;454-465.
13. Higgs P.G., Woodcock G. The accumulation of mutations in asexual populations and the structure of genealogical trees in the presence of selection. J. Math. Biol. 33:1995;677-702.
14. Hordijk W., Fontanari J.F., Stadler P.F. Shapes of tree representations of spin-glass landscapes. J. Phys. A. 36:2003;3671-3681.
15. Hudson R.R. Gene genealogies and the coalescent process. Oxford Surv. Evol. Biol. 7:1991;1-44.
16. Kirkpatrick M., Slatkin M. Searching for evolutionary patterns in the shape of a phylogenetic tree. Evolution. 47:1993;1171-1181.
17. Mooers A.O., Heard S.B. Inferring evolutionary process from phylogenetic tree shape. Quart. Rev. Biol. 72:1997;31-54.
18. Moran P.A.P. Random processes in genetics. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc. 54:1958;60-71.
19. Muller H.J. The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutation Res. 1:1964;2-9.
20. Nee S., Holmes E.C., May R.M., Harvey P.H. Extinction rates can be estimated from molecular phylogenies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B. 344:1994;77-82.
21. Purvis A., Katzourakis A., Agapow P.-M. Evaluating phylogenetic tree shape. two modifications to Fusco & Cronk's method J. Theor. Biol. 214:2002;99-103.
22. Rogers J.S. Central moments and probability distribution of Colless's coefficient of tree imbalance. Evolution. 48:1994;2026-2036.
23. Shao K.-T., Sokal R.R. Tree balance. Syst. Zool. 39:1990;266-276.