On the role of imagery modalities on motor learning

Journal of Sports Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 497-504

  Toussaint, Lucette ^a   Blandin, Yannick ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ DE POITIERS   (France)

Author keywords

Body configuration reproduction; Imagery practice; Motor learning; Sensorimotor representation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CASE CONTROL STUDY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGINATION; INSTRUMENTATION; KNEE; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VISION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; CASE-CONTROL STUDIES; FEEDBACK, SENSORY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGINATION; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; KNEE JOINT; LEARNING; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; MOVEMENT; PERCEPTION; POSTURE; PROPRIOCEPTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77951215173     PISSN: 02640414     EISSN: 1466447X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02640410903555855     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Allami, N., Paulignan, Y., Brovelli, A., and amp; Boussaoud, D. (2008). Visuo-motor learning with combination of different rates of motor imagery and physical practice. Experimental Brain Research, 184, 105-113.
2. Blandin, Y., Toussaint, L., & Shea, C. (2008). Specificity of practice: Interaction between concurrent sensory information and terminal feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 34, 994-1000.
3. Callow, N., & Hardy, L. (2004). The relationship between the use of kinaesthetic imagery and different visual imagery perspectives. Journal of Sports Sciences, 22, 167-177.
4. Decety, J., & Michel, F. (1989). Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks. Brain and Cognition, 11, 87-97.
5. Driskell, J. E., Copper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481-491.
6. Féry, Y. A. (2003). Differentiating visual and kinesthetic imagery in mental practice. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57,1-10.
7. Féry, Y. A., & Morizot, P. (2001). Kinesthetic and visual images in modelling closed motor skills: The example of the tennis serve. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 90, 707-722.
8. Flanagan, J. R., Vetter, P., Johansson, R. S., & Wolpert, D. M. (2003). Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Current Biology, 13, 146-150.
9. Fourkas, A. D., Marteniuk, R. G., & Khan, M. A. (2003). Guiding movements with internal representations: A reach-and-grasp task. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 165-172.
10. Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2005). Contribution from neurophysiological and psychological methods to the study of motor imagery. Brain Research Reviews, 50, 387-397.
11. Guillot, A., Collet, C., Nguyen, V. A., Malouin, F., Richards, C., & Doyon, J. (2009). Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 30,2157-2172.
12. Hall, C. R., Buckolz, E., & Fishburne, G. J. (1989). Searching for a relationship between imagery ability and memory of movements. Journal of Human Movement Studies, 17, 89-100.
13. Hall, C. R., Buckolz, E., & Fishburne, G. J. (1992). Imagery and the acquisition of motor skills. Canadian Journal of Sport Science, 17,19-27.
14. Hall, C. R., & Pongrac, J. (1983). Movement Imagery Questionnaire. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.
15. Hardy, L., & Callow, N. (1999). Efficacy of external and internal visual imagery perspectives for the enhancement of performance on tasks in which form is important. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 21, 95-112.
16. Ingvar, D. H., & Philipson, L. (1977). Distribution of cerebral blood flow in the dominant hemisphere during motor ideation and motor performance. Annals of Neurology, 2, 230-237.
17. Ivens, C. J., & Marteniuk, R. G. (1997). Increased sensitivity to changes in visual feedback with practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 326-338.
18. Jackson, P. L., Doyon, J., Richards, C. L., & Malouin, F. (2004). The efficacy of combined physical and mental practice in the learning of a foot-sequence task after stroke: A case report. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 18, 106-111.
19. Jackson, P. L., Meltzoff, A. N., & Decety, J. (2006). Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking. NeuroImage, 31, 429-439.
20. Jeannerod, M. (1995). Mental imagery in the motor context. Neuropsychologia, 33, 1419-1432.
21. Jeannerod, M. (1999). The 25th Bartlett Lecture. To act or not to act: Perspectives on the representation of actions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A, 52, 1-29.
22. Krigolson, O., Van Gyn, G., Tremblay, L., & Heath, M. (2006). Is there "feedback" during visual imagery? Evidence from a specificity of practice paradigm. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 24-32.
23. Milton, J., Small, S. L., & Solodkin, A. (2008). Imaging motor imagery: Methodological issues related to expertise. Methods, 45,336-341.
24. Mulder, T., Zijlstra, S., Zijlstra, W., & Hochstenbach, J. (2004). The role of motor imagery in learning a totally novel movement. Experimental Brain Research, 154, 211-217.
25. Nevill, A. M., & Copas, J. B. (1991). Using generalized linear models (GLMs) to model errors in motor performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 23, 241-250.
26. Noel, R. (1980). The effects of visuo-motor behavioural rehearsal of tennis performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 221-226.
27. Papaxanthis, C., Schieppati, M., Gentili, R., & Pozzo, T. (2002). Imagined and actual arm movements have similar durations when performed under different conditions of direction and mass. Experimental Brain Research, 143, 447-452.
28. Proteau, L., & Carnahan, H. (2001). What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: Vision dominance or transformation errors? Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 226-234.
29. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R. G., Girouard, Y., & Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science, 6, 181-199.
30. Proteau, L., Tremblay, L., & DeJaeger, D. (1998). Practice does not diminish the role of visual information in on-line control of a precision walking task: Support for the specificity of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 143-150.
31. Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2005). Specificity of learning in a video-aiming task: Modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 367-376.
32. Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Vinter, A. (2004). Sensory integration in the learning of aiming toward "self defined" targets. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 75, 381-387.
33. Robin, N., Dominique, L., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., Guillot, A., & Le Her, M. (2007). Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2, 177-188.
34. Sirigu, A., Daprati, E., Pradat-Diehl, P., Franck, N., & Jeannerod, M. (1999). Perception of self-generated movement following left parietal lesion. Brain, 122, 1867-1874.
35. Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P., Chen, E. E., & Small, S. L. (2004). Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cerebral Cortex, 14, 1246-1255.
36. Soucy, M. C., & Proteau, L. (2001). Development of multiple movement representations with practice: Specificity versus flexibility. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 243-254.
37. Toussaint, L., Robin, N., & Blandin, Y. (in press). On the content of sensorimotor representations after actual and motor imagery practice. Motor Control.
38. Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (1998). Specificity of practice: The case of powerlifting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 284-289.
39. Tremblay, L., Welsh, T. N., & Elliott, D. (2001). Specificity versus variability: Effects of practice conditions on the use of afferent information for manual aiming. Motor Control, 5, 347-360.
40. White, A., & Hardy, L. (1995). Use of different imagery perspectives on the learning and performance of different motor skills. British Journal of Psychology, 86, 169-180.
41. Wolpert, D. M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paired forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317-1329.
42. Yue, G., & Cole, K. J. (1992). Strength increases from the motor program: Comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 1114-1123.