Guiding movements with internal representations: A reach- and-grasp task

Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Volumn 74, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 165-172

  Fourkas, Alissa D ^a   Marteniuk, Ronald G ^a   Khan, Michael A ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b BANGOR UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Grasping; Memory trace; Motor processes; Spatial imagery

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE BEHAVIOR; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; BEHAVIOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; MEMORY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEEDBACK, PSYCHOLOGICAL; HUMANS; MEMORY; MOVEMENT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; SPATIAL BEHAVIOR; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 0041851014     PISSN: 02701367     EISSN: 21683824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02701367.2003.10609078     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Chua, R., & Elliott, D. (1993). Visual regulation of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 12, 365–401.
2. Chua, R., & Weeks, D. J. (1994). Cognitive and motor implications of mental imagery. (Reply to Jeannerod.) Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 203–204.
3. Elliott, D. (1988). The influence of visual target and limb information on manual aiming. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 42,57–68.
4. Elliott, D., Calvert, R., Jaeger, M., & Jones, R. (1990). A visual representation and the control of manual aiming movements. Journal of Motor Behavior, 22, 327–346.
5. Elliott, D., Carson, R. G., Goodman, D., & Chua, R. (1991). Discrete versus continuous control of manual aiming. Human Movement Science, 10, 393–418.
6. Elliott, D., & Madalena, J. (1987). The influence of premovement visual information on manual aiming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 39A, 541–549.
7. Elliott, D., & Maraj, B. K V. (1994). Visual-spatial movement goals. (Reply to Jeannerod.). Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17,207.
8. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187–245.
9. Jeannerod, M., & Marteniuk, R. G. (1992). Functional characteristics of prehension: From data to artificial networks. In L. Proteau & D. Elliott (Eds.), Vision and motor control (pp. 197–232). New York: North-Holland.
10. Khan, M. A., & Franks, I. M. (2000). The effect of practice on component submovements is dependent on visual feedback. Journal of Motor Behavior, 32, 227–240.
11. Logie, R. H. (1995). Visuo-spatial working memory. Hove, UK: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Marteniuk, R. G., Ivens, C. J., Brown, B. E., & Kalbfleisch, L. E. (1996). Prehension can be performed without on-going visual feedback. Unpublished Manuscript.
13. Schutz, R. W., & Gesseroli, M. E. (1993). Use, misuse, and disuse of psychometrics in sport psychology research. In R. N. Singer, M. L. Murphy, & K. Tennant (Eds.), Handbook of research on sport psychology (pp. 901–917). New York: Macmillan.
14. Shepard R.N., & Cooper, L. A. (1982). Mental images and their transformations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
15. Winer, B. J. (1971). Statistical principles in experimental design. Tokyo: McGraw-Hill Kogakusha.
16. Wing, A. M., Turton, A., & Fraser, C. (1986). Grasp size and accuracy of approach in reaching. Journal of Motor Behavior, 18, 245–260.