On the content of sensorimotor representations after actual and motor imagery practice

Motor Control

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 159-175

  Toussaint, Lucette ^a   Robin, Nicolas ^a   Blandin, Yannick ^a  

^a Centre National de La Recherche Scientifique   (France)

Author keywords

Exercise; Motor learning; Motor performance; Specificity of practice

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGERY; MEMORY; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; VISION;

EID: 77950801822     PISSN: 10871640     EISSN: 15432696     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/mcj.14.2.159     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Blandin, Y., Toussaint, L., & Shea, C.H. (2008). Specificity of practice: interaction between concurrent sensory information and terminal feedback. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 34, 994-1000.
2. Binkofski, F., Amunts, K., Stephan, K.M., Posse, S., Schormann, T., Freund, H.J., et al. (2000). Broca's region subserves imagery of motion: A combined cytoarchitectonic and fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping, 11, 273-285. (Pubitemid 33730879)
3. Coull, J., Tremblay, L., & Elliott, D. (2001). Examining the specificity of practice hypothesis: Is learning modality specific? Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 72, 345-354. (Pubitemid 33604390)
4. Decety, J., & Michel, F. (1989). Comparative analysis of actual and mental movement times in two graphic tasks. Brain and Cognition, 11, 87-97.
5. Decety, J., Jeannerod, M., Germain, M., & Pastene, J. (1991). Vegetative response during imagined movement is proportional to mental effort. Behavioural Brain Research, 42, 1-5.
6. Decety, J., Perani, D., Jeannerod, M., Bettinardi, V., Tadary, B., Woods, R., et al. (1994). Mapping motor representations with positron emission tomography. Nature, 371, 600-602. (Pubitemid 24315739)
7. Driskell, J.E., Cooper, C., & Moran, A. (1994). Does mental practice enhance performance? The Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 481-492.
8. Féry, Y.A. (2003). Differentiating visual and kinesthetic imagery in mental practice. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 1-10. (Pubitemid 37073382)
9. Flanagan, J.R., Vetter, P., Johansson, R.S., & Wolpert, D.M. (2003). Prediction precedes control in motor learning. Current Biology, 13, 146-150. (Pubitemid 36154343)
10. Gentili, R., Papaxanthis, C., & Pozzo, T. (2006). Improvement and generalization of arm motor performance through motor imagery practice. Neuroscience, 137, 761-772. (Pubitemid 43053941)
11. Georgopoulos, A.P., & Massey, J.T. (1987). Cognitive spatial-motor processes. Experimental Brain Research, 65, 361-370.
12. Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2005). Duration of mentally simulated movement: a review. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 10-20. (Pubitemid 40041430)
13. Guillot, A., & Collet, C. (2008). Construction of the motor imagery integrative model in sport: A review and theoretical investigation of motor imagery use. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 1, 31-44.
14. Guillot, A., Collet, C., Nguyen, V.A., Malouin, F., Richards, C., & Doyon, J. (in press). Brain activity during visual versus kinesthetic imagery: An fMRI study. Human Brain Mapping.
15. Hall, C.R., & Pongrac, J. (1983). Movement Imagery Questionnaire. London, Ontario: University of Western Ontario.
16. Ivens, C.J., & Marteniuk, R.G. (1997). Increased sensitivity to changes in visual feedback with practice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 29, 326-338.
17. Jeannerod, M. (1994). The representing brain: Neural correlates of motor intention and imagery. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 17, 187-245. (Pubitemid 2111513)
18. Jeannerod, M. (2001). Neural simulation of action: a unifying mechanism for motor cognition. NeuroImage, 14, 103-109.
19. Krigolson, O., Van Gyn, G., Tremblay, L., & Heath, M. (2006). Is there "feedback" during visual imagery? Evidence from a specificity of practice paradigm. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 24-32. (Pubitemid 44681951)
20. Mackrous, I., & Proteau, L. (2007). Specificity of practice results from differences in movement planning and strategies. Experimental Brain Research, 183, 181-193. (Pubitemid 47497714)
21. Miyai, I., Tanabe, H.C., Sase, I., Eda, H., Oda, I., Konishi, I., et al. (2001). Cortical mapping of gait in humans: a near-infrared spectroscopic topography study. NeuroImage, 14, 1186-1192. (Pubitemid 33049860)
22. Noel, R. (1980). The effects of visuo-motor behavioural rehearsal of tennis performance. Journal of Sport Psychology, 2, 221-226.
23. Papadelis, C., Kourtidou-Papadeli, C., Bamidis, P., & Albani, M. (2007). Effects of imagery training on cognitive performance and use of physiological measures as an assessment tool of mental effort. Brain and Cognition, 64, 74-85. (Pubitemid 46783184)
24. Proteau, L. (1995). Sensory integration in the learning of an aiming task. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 49, 113-120.
25. Proteau, L., & Carnahan, H. (2001). What causes specificity of practice in a manual aiming movement: vision dominance or transformation errors? Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 226-234. (Pubitemid 32730070)
26. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R.G., Girouard, Y., & Dugas, C. (1987). On the type of information used to control and learn an aiming movement after moderate and extensive training. Human Movement Science, 6, 181-199.
27. Proteau, L., Marteniuk, R.G., & Lévesque, L. (1992). A sensorimotor basis for motor learning: Evidence indicating specificity of practice. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 557-575.
28. Proteau, L., Tremblay, L., & DeJaeger, D. (1998). Practice does not diminish the role of visual information in on-line control of a precision walking task: Support for the specificity of practice hypothesis. Journal of Motor Behavior, 30, 143-150. (Pubitemid 28228323)
29. Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Proteau, L. (2005). Specificity of learning in a video-aiming task: Modifying the salience of dynamic visual cues. Journal of Motor Behavior, 37, 367-376. (Pubitemid 41026269)
30. Robin, C., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., & Vinter, A. (2004). Sensory integration in the learning of aiming toward "self-defined" targets. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 74, 381-387.
31. Robin, N., Dominique, L., Toussaint, L., Blandin, Y., Guillot, A., & Le Her, M. (2007). Effects of motor imagery training on service return accuracy in tennis: The role of imagery ability. International Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 2, 177-188.
32. Robin, N., Toussaint, L., & Blandin, Y. (2006). Importance des modalités d'imagerie dans l'apprentissage de reproduction de configurations corporelles simples. Science & Motricité, 57, 67-78.
33. Roure, R., Collet, C., Deschaumes-Molinaro, C., Delhomme, G., Dittmar, A., & Vernet-Maury, E. (1999). Imagery quality estimated by autonomic response is correlated to sporting performance enhancement. Physiology & Behavior, 66, 63-72. (Pubitemid 29155260)
34. Shenton, J.T., Schwoebel, J., & Coslett, H.B. (2004). Mental motor imagery and the body schema: evidence for proprioceptive dominance. Neuroscience Letters, 370, 19-24. (Pubitemid 39369849)
35. Solodkin, A., Hlustik, P., Chen, E.E., & Small, S.L. (2004). Fine modulation in network activation during motor execution and motor imagery. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.), 14, 1246-1255. (Pubitemid 39391202)
36. Soucy, M.C., & Proteau, L. (2001). Development of multiple movement representations with practice: specificity versus flexibility. Journal of Motor Behavior, 33, 243-254.
37. Stinear, C.M., Byblow, W.D., Steyvers, M., Levin, O., & Swinnen, S.P. (2006). Kinesthetic, but not visual, motor imagery modulates corticomotor excitability. Experimental Brain Research, 168, 157-164. (Pubitemid 41752821)
38. Stippich, C., Ochmann, H., & Sartor, K. (2002). Somatotopic mapping of the human primary sensorimotor cortex during motor imagery and motor execution by functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroscience Letters, 331, 50-54. (Pubitemid 35279380)
39. Tremblay, L., & Proteau, L. (1998). Specificity of practice: the case of powerlifting. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 69, 284-289.
40. Tremblay, L., Welsh, T.N., & Elliott, D. (2001). Specificity versus variability: Effects of practice conditions on the use of afferent information for manual aiming. Motor Control, 5, 347-360.
41. Wolpert, D.M., & Kawato, M. (1998). Multiple paire forward and inverse models for motor control. Neural Networks, 11, 1317-1329.
42. Yue, G., & Cole, K.J. (1992). Strength increases from the motor program. Comparison of training with maximal voluntary and imagined muscle contractions. Journal of Neurophysiology, 67, 1114-1123.