Correcting for intra-experiment variation in Illumina BeadChip data is necessary to generate robust gene-expression profiles

BMC Genomics

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2010, Pages

  Kitchen, Robert R ^a   Sabine, Vicky S ^a   Sims, Andrew H ^a   Macaskill, E Jane ^b   Renshaw, Lorna ^b   Thomas, Jeremy S ^b   van Hemert, Jano I ^a   Dixon, J Michael ^b   Bartlett, John M S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b WESTERN GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL ERROR; ARTICLE; BATCH PROCESS; BREAST TUMOR; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HYBRIDIZATION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MICROARRAY ANALYSIS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; ALGORITHM; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGY; DNA MICROARRAY; FEMALE; GENETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD;

RNA;

ALGORITHMS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BAYES THEOREM; BREAST NEOPLASMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; FEMALE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; HUMANS; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RNA, NEOPLASM;

EID: 77951185205     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-11-134     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Sims AH. Bioinformatics and breast cancer: what can high-throughput genomic approaches actually tell us?. J Clin Pathol 2009, 62(10):879-885. 10.1136/jcp.2008.060376, 19174421.
2. Ramaswamy S, Golub TR. DNA microarrays in clinical oncology. J Clin Oncol 2002, 20(7):1932-1941.
3. Clarke R, Ressom HW, Wang A, Xuan J, Liu MC, Gehan EA, Wang Y. The properties of high-dimensional data spaces: implications for exploring gene and protein expression data. Nat Rev Cancer 2008, 8(1):37-49. 10.1038/nrc2294, 2238676, 18097463.
4. Brazma A, Hingamp P, Quackenbush J, Sherlock G, Spellman P, Stoeckert C, Aach J, Ansorge W, Ball CA, Causton HC, Gaasterland T, Glenisson P, Holstege FC, Kim IF, Markowitz V, Matese JC, Parkinson H, Robinson A, Sarkans U, Schulze-Kremer S, Stewart J, Taylor R, Vilo J, Vingron M. Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data. Nat Genet 2001, 29(4):365-371. 10.1038/ng1201-365, 11726920.
5. Baggerly KA, Coombes KR. Deriving Chemosensitivity from Cell Lines: Forensic Bioinformatics and Reproducible Research in High-Throughput Biology. Annals of Applied Statistics
6. Ioannidis JP, Allison DB, Ball CA, Coulibaly I, Cui X, Culhane AC, Falchi M, Furlanello C, Game L, Jurman G, Mangion J, Mehta T, Nitzberg M, Page GP, Petretto E, van Noort V. Repeatability of published microarray gene expression analyses. Nat Genet 2009, 41(2):149-155. 10.1038/ng.295, 19174838.
7. Chu TM, Deng S, Wolfinger R, Paules RS, Hamadeh HK. Cross-site comparison of gene expression data reveals high similarity. Environ Health Perspect 2004, 112(4):449-455. 1241898, 15033594.
8. Shi L, Reid LH, Jones WD, Shippy R, Warrington JA, Baker SC, Collins PJ, de Longueville F, Kawasaki ES, Lee KY, et al. The MicroArray Quality Control (MAQC) project shows inter- and intraplatform reproducibility of gene expression measurements. Nat Biotechnol 2006, 24(9):1151-1161. 10.1038/nbt1239, 16964229.
9. Thompson KL, Pine PS. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of human whole genome microarrays using mixed-tissue RNA reference samples. Toxicol Lett 2009, 186(1):58-61. 10.1016/j.toxlet.2008.08.018, 18822358.
10. Benito M, Parker J, Du Q, Wu J, Xiang D, Perou CM, Marron JS. Adjustment of systematic microarray data biases. Bioinformatics 2004, 20(1):105-114. 10.1093/bioinformatics/btg385, 14693816.
11. Tan PK, Downey TJ, Spitznagel EL, Xu P, Fu D, Dimitrov DS, Lempicki RA, Raaka BM, Cam MC. Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31(19):5676-5684. 10.1093/nar/gkg763, 206463, 14500831.
12. Sims AH, Smethurst GJ, Hey Y, Okoniewski MJ, Pepper SD, Howell A, Miller CJ, Clarke RB. The removal of multiplicative, systematic bias allows integration of breast cancer gene expression datasets - improving meta-analysis and prediction of prognosis. BMC Med Genomics 2008, 1(1):42. 10.1186/1755-8794-1-42, 2563019, 18803878.
13. Eggle D, Debey-Pascher S, Beyer M, Schultze JL. The development of a comparison approach for Illumina bead chips unravels unexpected challenges applying newest generation microarrays. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:186. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-186, 2711080, 19538710.
14. Baggerly KA, Coombes KR, Neeley ES. Run batch effects potentially compromise the usefulness of genomic signatures for ovarian cancer. J Clin Oncol 2008, 26(7):1186-1187. author reply 1187-1188., 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.1951, 18309960.
15. Shi W, Banerjee A, Ritchie ME, Gerondakis S, Smyth GK. Illumina WG-6 BeadChip strips should be normalized separately. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:372. 10.1186/1471-2105-10-372, 2780421, 19903361.
16. Ransohoff DF. Bias as a threat to the validity of cancer molecular-marker research. Nat Rev Cancer 2005, 5(2):142-149. 10.1038/nrc1550, 15685197.
17. Ransohoff DF, Gourlay ML. Sources of Bias in Specimens for Research About Molecular Markers for Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010, 28(4):698-704. 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.6065, 20038718.
18. Walker WL, Liao IH, Gilbert DL, Wong B, Pollard KS, McCulloch CE, Lit L, Sharp FR. Empirical Bayes accomodation of batch-effects in microarray data using identical replicate reference samples: application to RNA expression profiling of blood from Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients. BMC Genomics 2008, 9:494. 10.1186/1471-2164-9-494, 2576259, 18937867.
19. Thompson KL, Pine PS, Rosenzweig BA, Turpaz Y, Retief J. Characterization of the effect of sample quality on high density oligonucleotide microarray data using progressively degraded rat liver RNA. BMC Biotechnol 2007, 7:57. 10.1186/1472-6750-7-57, 2082023, 17854504.
20. Alter O, Brown PO, Botstein D. Singular value decomposition for genome-wide expression data processing and modeling. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97(18):10101-10106. 10.1073/pnas.97.18.10101, 27718, 10963673.
21. Johnson WE, Li C, Rabinovic A. Adjusting batch effects in microarray expression data using empirical Bayes methods. Biostatistics 2007, 8(1):118-127. 10.1093/biostatistics/kxj037, 16632515.
22. Acharya CR, Hsu DS, Anders CK, Anguiano A, Salter KH, Walters KS, Redman RC, Tuchman SA, Moylan CA, Mukherjee S, Barry WT, Dressman HK, Ginsburg GS, Marcom KP, Garman KS, Lyman GH, Nevins JR, Potti A. Gene expression signatures, clinicopathological features, and individualized therapy in breast cancer. Jama 2008, 299(13):1574-1587. 10.1001/jama.299.13.1574, 18387932.
23. Ben-Porath I, Thomson MW, Carey VJ, Ge R, Bell GW, Regev A, Weinberg RA. An embryonic stem cell-like gene expression signature in poorly differentiated aggressive human tumors. Nat Genet 2008, 40(5):499-507. 10.1038/ng.127, 18443585.
24. Zhang Z, Chen D, Fenstermacher DA. Integrated analysis of independent gene expression microarray datasets improves the predictability of breast cancer outcome. BMC Genomics 2007, 8(1):331. 10.1186/1471-2164-8-331, 2064937, 17883867.
25. Shen R, Ghosh D, Chinnaiyan AM. Prognostic meta-signature of breast cancer developed by two-stage mixture modeling of microarray data. BMC Genomics 2004, 5(1):94. 10.1186/1471-2164-5-94, 544889, 15598354.
26. Teschendorff AE, Naderi A, Barbosa-Morais NL, Pinder SE, Ellis IO, Aparicio S, Brenton JD, Caldas C. A consensus prognostic gene expression classifier for ER positive breast cancer. Genome Biol 2006, 7(10):R101. 10.1186/gb-2006-7-10-r101, 1794561, 17076897.
27. Kuhn K, Baker SC, Chudin E, Lieu MH, Oeser S, Bennett H, Rigault P, Barker D, McDaniel TK, Chee MS. A novel, high-performance random array platform for quantitative gene expression profiling. Genome Res 2004, 14(11):2347-2356. 10.1101/gr.2739104, 525694, 15520296.
28. Barbosa-Morais NL, Dunning MJ, Samarajiwa SA, Darot JF, Ritchie ME, Lynch AG, Tavare S. A re-annotation pipeline for Illumina BeadArrays: improving the interpretation of gene expression data. Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 1;38(3):e17.
29. Tichopad A, Kitchen R, Riedmaier I, Becker C, Stahlberg A, Kubista M. Design and optimization of reverse-transcription quantitative PCR experiments. Clin Chem 2009, 55(10):1816-1823. 10.1373/clinchem.2009.126201, 19643838.
30. Sorlie T, Tibshirani R, Parker J, Hastie T, Marron JS, Nobel A, Deng S, Johnsen H, Pesich R, Geisler S, Demeter J, Perou CM, Lonning PE, Brown PO, Borresen-Dale AL, Botstein D. Repeated observation of breast tumor subtypes in independent gene expression data sets. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100(14):8418-8423. 10.1073/pnas.0932692100, 166244, 12829800.
31. Mullins M, Perreard L, Quackenbush JF, Gauthier N, Bayer S, Ellis M, Parker J, Perou CM, Szabo A, Bernard PS. Agreement in breast cancer classification between microarray and quantitative reverse transcription PCR from fresh-frozen and formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues. Clin Chem 2007, 53(7):1273-1279. 10.1373/clinchem.2006.083725, 17525107.
32. Thompson KL, Rosenzweig BA, Pine PS, Retief J, Turpaz Y, Afshari CA, Hamadeh HK, Damore MA, Boedigheimer M, Blomme E, Ciurlionis R, Waring JF, Fuscoe JC, Paules R, Tucker CJ, Fare T, Coffey EM, He Y, Collins PJ, Jarnagin K, Fujimoto S, Ganter B, Kiser G, Kaysser-Kranich T, Sina J, Sistare FD. Use of a mixed tissue RNA design for performance assessments on multiple microarray formats. Nucleic Acids Res 2005, 33(22):e187. 10.1093/nar/gni186, 1322274, 16377776.
33. Lander ES. Array of hope. Nat Genet 1999, 21(1 Suppl):3-4. 10.1038/4427, 9915492.
34. Rhodes DR, Yu J, Shanker K, Deshpande N, Varambally R, Ghosh D, Barrette T, Pandey A, Chinnaiyan AM. Large-scale meta-analysis of cancer microarray data identifies common transcriptional profiles of neoplastic transformation and progression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101(25):9309-9314. 10.1073/pnas.0401994101, 438973, 15184677.
35. Fare TL, Coffey EM, Dai H, He YD, Kessler DA, Kilian KA, Koch JE, LeProust E, Marton MJ, Meyer MR, Stoughton RB, Tokiwa GY, Wang Y. Effects of atmospheric ozone on microarray data quality. Anal Chem 2003, 75(17):4672-4675. 10.1021/ac034241b, 14632079.
36. Baggerly KA, Coombes KR. Deriving Chemosensitivity from Cell Lines: Forensic Bioinformatics and Reproducible Research in High-Throughput Biology. Annals of Applied Statistics 2009, 3(4). Online ahead of print., 2818752, 20148133.
37. Gentleman RC, Carey VJ, Bates DM, Bolstad B, Dettling M, Dudoit S, Ellis B, Gautier L, Ge Y, Gentry J, Hornik K, Hothorn T, Huber W, Iacus S, Irizarry R, Leisch F, Li C, Maechler M, Rossini AJ, Sawitzki G, Smith C, Smyth G, Tierney L, Yang JY, Zhang J. Bioconductor: open software development for computational biology and bioinformatics. Genome Biol 2004, 5(10):R80. 10.1186/gb-2004-5-10-r80, 545600, 15461798.
38. Ihaka R, Gentleman R. R: a language for data analysis and graphics. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 1996, 5:299-314.
39. Smyth GK, Michaud J, Scott HS. Use of within-array replicate spots for assessing differential expression in microarray experiments. Bioinformatics 2005, 21(9):2067-2075. 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti270, 15657102.
40. Tusher VG, Tibshirani R, Chu G. Significance analysis of microarrays applied to the ionizing radiation response. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001, 98(9):5116-5121. 10.1073/pnas.091062498, 33173, 11309499.
41. Lance GN, Williams WT. A General Theory of Classificatory Sorting Strategies. The Computer Journal 1967, 9(4):373-380.
42. Snedecor GW, Cochran WG. Statistical Methods 1989, Iowa State Univ Press, 8.