Cross-site comparison of gene expression data reveals high similarity

Environmental Health Perspectives

Volumn 112, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 449-455

  Chu, Tzu Ming ^a   Deng, Shibing ^a   Wolfinger, Russ ^a   Paules, Richard S ^b   Hamadeh, Hisham K ^c  

^a SAS INSTITUTE INC   (United States)

^b NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH SCIENCES   (United States)

^c AMGEN INC   (United States)

Author keywords

Cross site comparison; Gene expression; Hepatotoxicity; ILSI; Toxicogenomics

Indexed keywords

METHAPYRILENE; RNA;

ANALYTIC METHOD; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETIC TOXICOLOGY; GENOMICS; LIVER TOXICITY; MALE; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RAT; RISK ASSESSMENT; RNA HYBRIDIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE;

ANIMALIA; EUKARYOTA;

EID: 1542361725     PISSN: 00916765     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1289/ehp.6787     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Affymetrix, Inc. 2002. GeneChip Expression Analysis: Data Analysis Fundamentals. Santa Clara, CA:AFfymetric, Inc. Available: http://www.affymetrix.com/support/downloads/manuals/data_ analysis_fu_fundamentalsn_ma_manual.pdf [accessed 7 October 2003].
2. Bolstad BM, Irizarry RA, Astrand M, Speed TP. 2003. A comparison of normalization methods for high-density oligonucleotide array data based on bias and variance. Bioinformatics 19:185-193.
3. Choi JK, Yu U, Kim S, Yoo OJ. 2003. Combining multiple microarray studies and modeling interstudy variation. Bioinformatics 19 (suppl 1):184-190.
4. Chu T, Weir B, Wolfinger RD. 2002. A systematic statistical linear modeling approach to oligonucleotide array experiments. Math Biosci 176:35-51.
5. Chu T, Weir BS, Wolfinger RD. In press. Comparison of Li-Wong and loglinear mixed models for the statistical analysis of oligonucleotide arrays. Bioinformatics.
6. Dudoit S, Yang YH, Callow MJ, Speed TP. 2002. Statistical methods for identifying genes with differential expression in replicated cDNA microarray experiments. Stat Sin 12:111-139.
7. Ghosh D, Barette TR, Rhodes D, Chinnaiyan AM. 2003. Statistical issues and methods for meta-analysis of microarray data: A case study in prostate cancer. Funct Integr Genomics 3:180-188.
8. Irizarry RA, Hobbs B, Collin F, Beazer-Barclay YD, Antonellis KJ, Scherf U, et al. 2003. Exploration, normalization, and summaries of high density oligonucleotide array probe level data. Biostatistics 4:249-264.
9. Li C, Wong WH. 2001. Model-base analysis of oligonucleotide arrays: Expression index computation and outlier detection. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:31-36.
10. Lockhart D, Dong H, Byrne M, Follettie M, Gallo M, Chee M, et al. 1996. Expression monitoring by hybridization to high-density oligonucleotide arrays. Nat Biotechnol 14:1675-1680.
11. SAS Institute Inc. 1999. SAS/STAT Software, Version 8. Cary, NC:SAS Institute, Inc.
12. Schadt E, Li C, Eliss B, Wong WH. 2001. Feature extraction and normalization algorithms for high-density oligonucleotide gene expression array data. J Cell Biochem (suppl 37):120-125.
13. Tan PK, Downey TJ, Spitznagel EL, Xu P, Fu D, Dimitrov DS, et al. 2003. Evaluation of gene expression measurements from commercial microarray platforms. Nucleic Acids Res 31:5676-5684.