Bone reactions to oxidized titanium implants with electrochemical anion sulphuric acid and phosphoric acid incorporation

Clinical implant dentistry and related research

Volumn 4, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 78-87

  Sul, Young Taeg ^a,b   Johansson, Carina B ^a   Kang, Yunmo ^b   Jeon, Dong Gyun ^b   Albrektsson, Tomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^b Osseointegration Research Institute   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMATERIAL; PHOSPHORIC ACID; SULFURIC ACID; TITANIUM; TITANIUM DIOXIDE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BONE; BONE MATRIX; BONE REGENERATION; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; MALE; MECHANICAL STRESS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RABBIT; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; STATISTICS; SURFACE PROPERTY; TIBIA; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TORQUE; ULTRASTRUCTURE; X RAY DIFFRACTION;

ANIMALS; BIOCOMPATIBLE MATERIALS; BONE AND BONES; BONE MATRIX; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; FEMALE; FEMUR; MALE; MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; OSSEOINTEGRATION; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PHOSPHORIC ACIDS; RABBITS; STATISTICS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; STRESS, MECHANICAL; SULFURIC ACIDS; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIBIA; TITANIUM; TORQUE; X-RAY DIFFRACTION;

EID: 0036361369     PISSN: 15230899     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1708-8208.2002.tb00156.x     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. 1 Lausmaa J, Kasemo B. Surface spectroscopic characterization of titanium implant materials. Appl Surf Sci 1990 ; 44: 133–146.
2. 2 Olefjord I, Hansson S. Surface analysis of four dental implant system. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1993 ; 8: 32–40.
3. 3 Williams DF. Corrosion of implant materials. Ann Rev Mater Sci 1976 ; 6: 237–265.
4. 4 Zitter H, Plenk HJ. The electrochemical behaviour of metallic implant materials as indicator of their biocompatibility. J Biomed Mater Res 1987 ; 21: 881–896.
5. 5 Tengvall P, Lundström I. Physicochemical considerations of titanium as a biomaterial. Clin Mater 1992 ; 9: 115–134.
6. 6 Wennerberg A. On surface roughness and implant incorporation. PhD thesis, Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, 1996.
7. 7 Cochran DL. A comparison of endosseous dental implant surfaces. J Periodontol 1999 ; 70: 1523–1539.
8. 8 Testori T, Wiseman L, Woolfe S, Porter SS. A prospective multicenter clinical study of the Osseotite implant: four‐year interim report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2001 ; 16: 193–200.
9. 9 Buser D, Nydegger T, Oxland T, et al. Interface shear strength of titanium implants with a sandblasted and acid‐etched surface: a biomechanical study in the maxilla of miniature pigs. J Biomed Mater Res 1999 ; 45: 75–83.
10. 10 Palmer RM, Palmer PJ, Smith BJ. A 5‐year prospective study of Astra single‐tooth implants. Clin Oral Implants Res 2000 ; 11: 179–182.
11. 11 Deporter D, Watson P, Pharoah M, Levy D, Todescan R. Five‐ to six‐year results of a prospective clinical trial using the Endopore ® dental implant and a mandibular overdenture. Clin Oral Implants Res 1999 ; 10: 95–102.
12. 12 Hanawa T, Kamiura Y, Yamamoto S, et al. Early bone formation around calcium‐ion‐implanted titanium inserted into rat tibiae. J Biomed Mater Res 1997 ; 36: 131–136.
13. 13 Henry P, Tan AE, Allan BP. Removal torque comparison of TiUnite and turned implants in the greyhound dog mandible. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000 ; 1: 15–17.
14. 14 Nishiguchi S, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M, Kim HY, Miyaji F, Kokubo T. The effect of heat treatment on bone‐bonding ability of alkali‐treated titanium. Biomaterials 1999 ; 20: 491–500.
15. 15 Albrektsson T, Johansson C, Lundgren AK, Sul YT, Gottlow J. Experimental studies on oxidized implants. A histomor‐phometrical and biomechanical analysis. Appl Osseointegration Res 2000 ; 1: 21–24.
16. 16 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Röser K, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Oxidised implants and their influence on the bone response. J Mater Sci Mater Med 2001 ; 12: 1025–1031.
17. 17 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson T. Resonance frequency and removal torque analysis of implants with turned and anodized surface oxides. Clin Oral Implants Res 2001. (In press)
18. 18 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Roser K, Albrektsson T. Qualitative and quantitative observations of bone tissue reactions to anodised implants. A histologic, enzyme histochemical and histomorphometric analysis. Biomaterials 2001. (In press)
19. 19 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Petronis S, et al. Characteristics of the surface oxides on turned and electrochemically oxidized pure titanium implants up to dielectric breakdown: the oxide thickness, micropore configurations, surface roughness, crystal structure, and chemical composition. Biomaterials 2002 ; 23: 491–501.
20. 20 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T. Calcium‐reinforced, oxidized titanium implants result in rapid osseointegration. 2001. (Submitted)
21. 21 Johansson CB. On tissue reactions to metal implants. PhD thesis, Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, 1991.
22. 22 Gottlander M. On hard tissue reactions to hydroxyapatite‐coated titanium implants. PhD thesis, Department of Biomaterials/Handicap Research, University of Gothenburg, Sweden, 1994.
23. 23 Johansson CB, Han CH, Wennerberg A, Albrektsson A. A quantitative comparison of machined and commercially pure titanium and titanium aluminum‐vanadium implants in rabbit bone. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implant 1998 ; 13: 315–321.
24. 24 Donath K. Preparation of histologic sections by cutting‐grinding technique for hard tissue and other materials not suitable to be sectioned by routine methods. Norderstedt: EXAKT‐Kulzer‐Publication, 1993.
25. 25 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Jeong Y, Albrektsson T. The electrochemical oxide growth behaviour on titanium in acid and alkaline electrolytes. Med Eng Phys 2001 ; 23: 329–346.
26. 26 Johansson CB, Lausmaa J, Röstlund T, Thomsen P. Commercially pure titanium and Ti6A14V implants with and without nitrogen ion‐implantation: surface characterization and quantitative studies in rabbit cortical bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1993 ; 4: 132–141.
27. 27 Hanawa H. Early bone formation around calcium ion‐implanted titanium inserted into rat tibia: reply. J Biomed Mater Res 1999 ; 44: 352–353.
28. 28 Yan WQ, Nakamura T, Kobayashi M, Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T. Bonding of chemically treated titanium implants to bone. J Biomed Mater Res 1997 ; 37: 267–275.
29. 29 Skripitz R, Aspenberg P. Tensile bond between bone and titanium. Acta Orthop Scand 1998 ; 69: 2–6.
30. 30 Kokubo T. Recent progress in bioactive materials. The Hague, Netherlands: The North Sea Biomaterials, 1998.
31. 31 Kim HM, Miyaji F, Kokubo T, Nakamura T. Preparation of bioactive Ti and its alloy via simple chemical surface treatment. J Biomed Mater Res 1996 ; 32: 409–417.
32. 32 Ellingsen JE. Pre‐treatment of titanium implants with fluoride improves their retention in bone. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1995 ; 6: 749–753.
33. 33 Johansson CB, Wennerberg A, Holmén A, Ellingsen JE. Enhanced fixation of bone to fluoride‐modified implants. In: Von Recum AF, Lucas LC, eds. Transactions of the Sixth World Biomaterials Congress, Kamuela, Hawaii, May 15–20, 2000. Minneapolis, MN: Society for Biomaterials, 2000: 601.
34. 34 Sul YT, Johansson CB, Albrektsson T, Jeong Y, Wennerberg A. Reinforcement of osseointegration of electrochemically oxidized titanium implants by Micro Arc Oxidation (MAO). Special emphasis on potential biochemical bonding of oxidized titanium implants. 2001. (Submitted)