Auditory discrimination of voice-onset time and its relationship with reading ability

Laterality

Volumn 15, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 343-360

  Arciuli, Joanne ^a   Rankine, Tracey ^b   Monaghan, Padraic ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^b CHARLES STURT UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c LANCASTER UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attention; DL; Lateralisation; Reading ability; Speech perception; VOT

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DICHOTIC LISTENING; HEARING; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; HUMAN; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; READING;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ATTENTION; AUDITORY PERCEPTION; CHILD; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; READING;

EID: 77951153209     PISSN: 1357650X     EISSN: 14640678     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13576500902799671     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Asbjornsen, A., & Bryden, M. (1998). Auditory attentional shifts in reading-disabled students: Quantification of attentional effectiveness by the attentional shift index. Neuropsychologia, 36(2), 143-148.
2. Asbjornsen, A., Helland, T., Obrzut, J., & Boliek, C. (2003). The role of dichotic listeningperformance and tasks of executive functions in reading impairment: A discriminant functionanalysis. Child Neuropsychology, 9(4), 227-288.
3. Aslin, R., Pisoni, D., Hennessy, B., & Perey, A. (1981). Determination of voice onset time byhuman infants: New findings and implications for the effects of early experience. Child Development, 52(4), 1135-1145.
4. Bond, G., & Dijkstra, R. (1967). The cooperative research program in first-grade reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 2, 5-42.
5. Bryden, M., & Sprott, D. (1981). Statistical determination of degree of laterality. Neuropsychologia, 19(4), 571-581.
6. Cutting, L., & Scarborough, H. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributionsof word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on howcomprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(3), 277-299.
7. Darwin, C. (1971). Ear differences in the recall of fricatives and vowels. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23(1), 46-62.
8. Eichele, T., Nordby, H., Rimol, L. M., & Hugdahl, K. (2005). Asymmetry of evoked potentiallatency to speech sounds predicts the ear advantage in dichotic listening. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 405-412.
9. Frye, R., McGraw Fisher, J., Coty, A., Zarella, M., Liederman, J., & Halgren, E. (2007). Linearcoding of voice onset time. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 19(9), 1476-1487.
10. Gernsbacher, M., & Faust, M. (1991). The mechanism of suppression: A component of generalcomprehension skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning. Memory and Cognition, 17(2), 245-262.
11. Gough, P., & Tunmer, W. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6-10.
12. Haggard, M. (1971). Encoding and the REA for speech signals. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 23(1), 34-45.
13. Helland, T., & Asbjornsen, A. (2000). Executive functions in dyslexia. Child Neuropsychology, 6(1), 37-48.
14. Horn, W., & O'Donnell, J. (1984). Early identification of learning disabilities: A comparison of twomethods. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 1106-1118.
15. Hugdahl, K., & Andersson, L. (1984). A dichotic listening study of differences in cerebralorganisation in dextral and sinistral subjects. Cortex, 20(1), 135-141.
16. Hugdahl, K., & Andersson, L. (1986). The "forced-attention paradigm" in dichotic listening to CV-syllables: A comparison between adults and children. Cortex, 22(3), 417-432.
17. Hugdahl, K., Bronnick, K., Kyllingsbaek, S., Law, I., Gade, A., & Paulson, O. B. (1999). Brainactivation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instruments stimuli: A O-PET study. Neuropsychologia, 37, 431-440.
18. Hugdahl, K., Carlsson, G., Uvebrant, P., & Lundervold, A. (1997). Dichotic listening performanceand intracarotid amobarbital injections in children/adolescents: Comparisons pre-and postoperatively. Archives of Neurology, 54, 1494-1500.
19. Hurford, D., Darrow, L., Edwards, T., Howerton, C., Mote, C., Schauf, J., et al. (1993). Anexamination of phonemic processing abilities in children during their first-grade year. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 167-177.
20. Hurford, D., Schauf, J., Bunce, L., Blaich, T., & Moore, K. (1994). Early identification of childrenat risk for reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 371-382.
21. Hutchison, E., Blumstein, S., & Myers, E. (2008). An event-related fMRI investigation of voiceonsettime discrimination. NeuroImage, 40, 342-352.
22. Kershner, J., & Morton, L. (1990). Directed attention dichotic listening in reading disabledchildren: A test of four models of maladaptive lateralisation. Neuropsychologia, 28(2), 181-198.
23. Kershner, J., & Morton, L. (1995). Attentional control over language lateralisation in dyslexicchildren: Deficit or delay? Neuropsychologia, 33(1), 39-51.
24. Kimura, D. (1967). Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex, 3, 163-168.
25. Kinsbourne, M. (1970). The cerebral basis of lateral asymmetries in attention. Acta Psychologia, 33, 193-201.
26. Liberman, A. M. (1957). Some results on speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29, 117-123.
27. Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. S. (1967). Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech, 10(1), 1-28.
28. Long, D., Oppy, B., & Seely, M. (1997). Individual differences in readers' sentence- and text-levelrepresentations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 129-145.
29. Martinez, J., & Sanchez, E. (1999). Dichotic listening CV lateralisation and developmentaldyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 21(4), 519-534.
30. Moni, K. B., & Jobling, A. (2001). Reading-related literacy learning of young adults with Downsyndrome: Findings from a three year teaching and research program. International Journal of Disability. Development and Education, 48(4), 377-394.
31. Neale, M. (1999). Neale Analysis of Reading Ability (3rd ed., Australian standardisation). Camberwell, Victoria: ACER Press.
32. Niccum, N., Speaks, C., Katsuki-Nakamura, J., & Leathers, R. (1989). Effects of decision variableson stimulus dominance in dichotic listening. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 32, 184-188.
33. Oldfield, R. (1971). The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh Inventory. Neuropsychologia, 9(1), 97-113.
34. O'Leary, D. S. (2003). Effects of attention on hemispheric asymmetry. In K. Hugdahl & R. J. Davidson (Eds.), The asymmetrical brain (pp. 477-508). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
35. Obrzut, J., Boliek, C., & Bryden, M. (1997). Dichotic listening, handedness and reading ability: A meta-analysis. Developmental Neuropsychology, 13(1), 97-110.
36. Page, M., Wilson, B. A., Shiel, A., Carter, G., & Norris, D. (2006). What is the locus of theerrorless-learning advantage? Neuropsychologia, 44, 90-100.
37. Plaza,M., & Cohen, H. (2007). The contribution of phonological awareness and visual attention inearly reading and spelling. Dyslexia: An International Journal of Research and Practice, 13(1), 67-76.
38. Repp, B. H., & Liberman, A. H. (1987). Phonetic categories are flexible. In S. Harnad (Ed.), Categorical perception (pp. 89-112). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
39. Rimol, L. M., Eichele, T., & Hugdahl, K. (2006). The effect of voice-onset time on dichoticlistening with consonant-vowel syllables. Neuropsychologia, 44(2), 191-196.
40. Sandmann, P., Eichele, T., Specht, K., Janke, L., Rimol, L., Nordby, H., et al. (2007). Hemisphericasymmetries in the processing of temporal acoustic cues in consonant-vowel syllables. Restorative Neurology and Neuroscience, 25(3-4), 227-240.
41. Shaywitz, S. E., Shaywitz, B. A., Pugh, K. R., Fulbright, R. K., Skudlarski, O., Mencl, W. E., et al. (2003). Neural systems for compensation and persistence: Young adult outcome of childhoodreading disability. Biological Psychiatry, 54, 25-33.
42. Speaks, C., Niccum, N., Carney, E., & Johnson, C. (1981). Stimulus dominance in dichoticlistening. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 24, 430-437.
43. Stackhouse, J., & Wells, B. (1997). How do speech and language problems affect literacydevelopment? In C. Hulme & M. Snowling. (Eds.), Dyslexia: Biology, cognition and intervention (pp. 182-211). London: Whurr.
44. Stevenson, H., & Newman, R. (1986). Long-term prediction of achievement and attitudes inmathematics and reading. Child Development, 57, 646-659.
45. Tallus, J., Hugdahl, K., Alho, K., Medvedev, S., & Hamalainen, H. (2007). Interaural intensitydifference and ear advantage in listening to dichotic consonant-vowel syllable pairs. Brain Research, 1185, 195-200.
46. Thomsen, T., Rimol, L. M., Ersland, L., & Hugdahl, K. (2004). Dichotic listening revealsfunctional specificity in prefrontal cortex: an fMRI study. Neuroimage, 21(1), 211-218.
47. Wexler, B. (1988). Dichotic presentation as a method for single hemisphere simulation studies. In K. Hugdahl (Ed.), Handbook of dichotic listening: Theory, methods and research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.