Brain activation during dichotic presentations of consonant-vowel and musical instrument stimuli: A 15O-PET study

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 37, Issue 4, 1999, Pages 431-440

  Hugdahl, Kenneth ^a   Brønnick, Kolbjørn ^a   Kyllingsbæk, Søren ^b   Law, Ian ^b   Gade, Anders ^b   Paulson, Olaf B ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BERGEN   (Norway)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

OXYGEN 15;

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY LATERALIZATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; BRAIN ASYMMETRY; BRAIN BLOOD FLOW; CEREBELLUM; DICHOTIC LISTENING; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; MALE; MUSIC; NORMAL HUMAN; OCCIPITAL LOBE; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PREFRONTAL CORTEX; TEMPORAL LOBE; VERBALIZATION;

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BRAIN MAPPING; CEREBELLUM; CEREBRAL CORTEX; CEREBROVASCULAR CIRCULATION; DICHOTIC LISTENING TESTS; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FRONTAL LOBE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; MUSIC; OCCIPITAL LOBE; PHONETICS; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; TEMPORAL LOBE; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED;

EID: 0033065086     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0028-3932(98)00101-8     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bryden MP. Ear preference in auditory perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology 1963;65:103-5.
2. Kimura D. Cerebral dominance and the perception of verbal stimuli. Canadian Journal of Psychology 1961;15:166-71.
3. Hugdahl K, Andersson B. A dichotic listening study of differences in cerebral organization in dextral and sinistral subjects. Cortex 1984;20:135-41.
4. Studdert-Kennedy M, Shankweiler D. Hemispheric specialization for speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 1970;48:579-94.
5. Kimura D. Left-right differences in the perception of melodies. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1964;16:355-8.
6. Bryden MP. An overview of the dichotic listening procedure and its relation to cerebral organization. In: Hugdahl, K. editor. Handbook of dichotic listening: theory, methods, and research. Chichester, U.K.: Wiley & Sons, 1988. pp. 1-43.
7. Bryden MP, Ley RG, Sugarman JH. A left-ear advantage for identifying the emotional quality of tonal sequences. Neuropsychologia 1982;20:83-7.
8. Messerli P, Pegna A, Sordet N. Hemispheric dominance for melody recognition in musicians and non-musicians. Neuropsychologia 1995;33:395-405.
9. Kimura D. Functional asymmetry of the brain in dichotic listening. Cortex 1967;3:163-8.
10. Hugdahl K. Dichotic listening: probing temporal lobe functional integrity. In: Davidson RJ, Hudgahl K, editors. Brain asymmetry. Cambridge MA: MIT Press, 1995:123-156.
11. Maximilian VA. Cortical blood flow asymmetry during monaural verbal stimulation. Brain and Language 1982;15:1-11.
12. Connolly JF. Stability of pathway-hemispheric differences in the auditory event related potential (ERP) to monaural stimulation. Psychophysiology 1985;22:87-96.
13. Rosenzweig MR. Representations of the two ears at the auditory cortex. American journal of Physiology 1951;167:147-214.
14. Majkowski J, Bochenek Z, Bochenek W, Knapik-Fijalkowska D, Kopec J, Latency of average evoked potentials to contralateral and ipsilateral auditory stimulation in normal subjects. Brain Research 1971;24:416-9.
15. Hugdahl K, Carlsson G, Uvebrant P, Lundervold AJ. Dichotic listening performance and intracarotid amobarbital injections in children/adolescents: Comparisons pre- and post-operatively. Archives of Neurology 1997;54:1494-1500.
16. Strauss E. Dichotic listening and sodium-amytal: Functional and morphological aspects of hemispheric asymmetry. In: Hugdahl, K. editor. Handbook of dichotic listening: theory, methods and research. Wiley & Sons, 1988:117-39.
17. Wada J, Rasmussen T. Intracarotid injections of sodium amytal for the lateralization of cerebral speech dominance. Journal of Neurosurgery 1960;17:266-82.
18. Coffey CE, Bryden MP, Schroering ES, Wilson WH, Matthew RJ. Regional cerebral blood flow correlates of a dichotic listening task. Neuropsychiatry 1989;1:46-52.
19. O'Leary D, Andreasen NC, Hurtig RR, Hichwa RD, Watkins GL, Boles Ponto LL, Rogers M, Kirchner PT. A positron emission tomography study of binaurally and dichotically presented stimuli: Effects of level of language and directed attention. Brain and Language 1996;53:20-39.
20. O'Leary DS, Andreasen NC, Hurtig RR, Kesler ML, Rogers M, Arndt S, Cizadlo T, Watkins GL, Boles Ponto LL, Kirchner PT, Hichwa RD. Auditory attentional deficits in patients with schizophrenia. Archives of General Psychiatry 1996;53:633-41.
21. Esgate A, Burton A, Burton E. Lateral advantages in same-different comparisons of two-note, dichotically presented chords to a successively-presented probe. Neuropsychologia 1997;35:177-82.
22. Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: The Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia 1971;9:97-113.
23. Schneider W, Rodgers K, Maciejcyk VK, Zuccolotto A, St. James J. MEL Professional: users guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc, 1995.
24. DeGrado TR, Turkington TG, Williams JJ, Stearns CW, Hoffman JM, Coleman RE. Performance Characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1994;35:1398-1406.
25. 15O tissue activity. Journal of Nuclear Medicine 1989;30:141-9.
26. Friston KJ. Statistical parametric mapping. In: Thatcher RW, Hallett M, Zeffiro T, Roy John, E, Huerta M., editors. Functional neuroimaging: technical foundations. San Diego: Academic Press, 1994:79-93.
27. Woods RP, Cherry SR, Mazziotta JC. Rapid automated algorithm for aligning and reslicing PET images. Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography 1992;16:620-33.
28. Talairach J, Tournoux P. Co-planar stereotaxic atlas of the human brain. 3-D proportional system: an approach to cerebral imaging. Stuttgart and New York: Georg Thieme Verlag, 1988.
29. Friston KJ, Ashburner J, Frith CD, Poline J, Heather JD, Frackowiak RSJ. Spatial registration and normalisation of images. Human Brain Mapping 1995;2:165-89.
30. Friston KJ, Firth CD, Liddle PF, Frackowiak RSJ. Comparing functional (PET) images: The assessment of significant change. Journal of Cerebral Blood Flow Methods 1991;11:690-9.
31. Kirk RA. editor. Experimental design: procedures for the behavioral sciences. Belmont, Ca: Brooks-Cole, 1968.
32. Larsen JL, Høien T, Lundberg I, Ødegaard H. MRI evaluation of the size and symmetry of the planum temporale in adolescents with developmental dyslexia. Brain and Language 1990;39:255-88.
33. Steinmetz H, Volkmann J, Jäncke L, Freund HJ. Anatomical left-right asymmetry of language-related temporal cortex is different in left-handers. Annals of Neurology 1991;29:315-9.
34. Shaywitz B, Shaywitz S, Pugh K, Constable T, Skudlarski P, Fulbright R, Bronen R, Fletcher J, Shankweiler D, Katz L, Gore J. Sex differences in the functional organization for language. Nature 1995;373:607-9.
35. Fiez JA. Phonology, semantics, and the role of the left inferior prefrontal cortex. Human Brain Mapping 1997;5:79-83.
36. Petersen S, Fox P, Posner M, Mintun M, Raichle M. Positron emission tomographic studies of the cortical anatomy of single-word processing. Nature 1988;331:585-9.
37. Lee GP, Loring DW, Varney NR, Roberts RJ, Newell JR, Martin JA, Smith JR, King DW, Meador KJ, Murro AM. Do dichotic work listening asymmetries predict side of temporal lobe seizure onset? Epilepsy Research 1994;19:153-60.
38. Zatorre RJ, Evans AC, Meyer E. Neural mechanisms underlying melodic perception and memory for pitch. Journal of Neuroscience 1994;14:1908-19.