Creativity and ethics: The relationship of creative and ethical problem-solving

Creativity Research Journal

Volumn 22, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 74-89

  Mumford, Michael D ^a   Waples, Ethan P ^b   Antes, Alison L ^a   Brown, Ryan P ^a   Connelly, Shane ^a   Murphy, Stephen T ^c   Devenport, Lynn D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^c PEARSON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 77951044703     PISSN: 10400419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10400410903579619     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Andreani, O. D., & Pagnin, A. (1993). Moral judgment in creative and talented adolescents. Creativity Research Journal, 6, 45-64.
2. Baer, J. (2003). Evaluative thinking, creativity, and task specificity: Separating wheat from chaff is not the same as finding needles in haystacks. In M. A. Runco (Ed.), Critical creative processes (pp. 129-151). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
3. Baughman, W. A., & Mumford, M. D. (1995). Process analytic models of creative capacities: Operations involved in the combination and reorganization process. Creativity Research Journal, 8, 37-62.
4. Brophy, D. R. (1998). Understanding, measuring, and enhancing individual creative problem solving efforts. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 123-150.
5. Brower, R. (1999). Dangerous minds: Eminently creative people who spent time in jail. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 3-13.
6. Butterfield, K. D., Trevio, L. K., & Weaver, G. R. (2000). Moral awareness in business organizations: Influences of issue-related and social context factors. Human Relations, 53, 981-1018.
7. Campbell, E. G., Louis, K. S., & Blumenthal, D. (1998). Looking a gift horse in the mouth: Corporate gifts that support life sciences research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 279, 995-999.
8. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). If we are so rich, why aren't we happy? American Psychologist, 54, 821-827.
9. Drazin, R., Glynn, M. A., & Kazanjian, R. K. (1999). Multilevel theorizing about creativity in organizations: A sense making perspective. Academy of Management Review, 24, 286-329.
10. Eisenman, R. (1999). Creative prisoners: Do they exist. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 205-210.
11. Emmons, R. A. (1987). Narcissism: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 11-17.
12. Ericsson, K. A., & Charness, N. (1994). Expert performance: Its structure and acquisition. American Psychologist, 49, 725-747.
13. Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273-296). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Feist, G. J., & Gorman, M. E. (1998). The psychology of science: Review and integration of a nascent discipline. Review of General Psychology, 2, 3-47.
15. Finke, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (1992). Creative cognition: Theory, research, and applications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. Fleishman, E. A., & Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of human performance: The description of human tasks. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
17. Fromm, E. (1973). The anatomy of human destructiveness. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
18. Ghiselin, B. (1963). The creative process. New York: New American Library.
19. Hamner, W. C., & Organ, D. W. (1978). Organizational behavior: An applied psychological approach. Dallas, TX: Business Publications.
20. Helton-Fauth, W., Gaddis, B., Scott, G., Mumford, M., Devenport, L., Connelly, S., et al. (2003). A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 10, 205-228.
21. Hennessey, B. A., & Amabile, T. M. (1988). The conditions of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 11-38). New York: Cambridge University Press.
22. Hunter, S. T., Bedell-Avers, K. E., Ligon, G. S., Hunsicker, C. M., Mumford, M. D. (2008). Applying multiple knowledge structures in creative thought: Effects on idea generation and problem-solving. Creativity Research Journal, 20, 137-154.
23. Isaksen, S. G., & Parres, S. J. (1985). Curriculum planning for creative thinking and problem solving. Journal of Creative Behavior, 19, 1-29.
24. James, K., Clark, K., & Cropanzano, R. (1999). Positive and negative creativity in groups, institutions, and organizations: A model and theoretical extension. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 211-226.
25. Jamison, K. (1993). Touched with fire: Manic-depressive illness and the artistic temperament. New York: Free Press.
26. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory: Versions 4a and 54 [Technical Report]. Berkeley, CA: University of California, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
27. Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., & Mumford, M. D. (2008). A qualitative approach to responsible conduct of research (RCR) training development: Identification of metacognitive strategies. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 3-31.
28. Kligyte, V., Marcy, R. T., Waples, E. P., Sevier, S. T., Godfrey, E. S., Mumford, M. D., et al. (2008). Application of a sensemaking approach to ethics training in the physical sciences and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 251-278.
29. Koenig, R. (2001). Scientific misconduct: Welcome rules widen the net. Science, 293, 1411.
30. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Lonergan, D. C., Scott, G. M., & Mumford, M. D. (2004). Evaluative aspects of creative thought: Effects of appraisal and revision standards. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 231-246.
32. Lubart, T. I. (2001). Models of the creative process: Past, present, and future. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 295-308.
33. Ludwig, A. M. (1995). The price of greatness: Resolving the creativity and madness controversy. New York: Guilford.
34. Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 11, 93-101.
35. Macrina, F. L. (2000). Scientific integrity: An introductory text with cases (2nd ed.) Washington, DC: American Society for Microbiology Press.
36. Marshall, E. (1996). Fraud strikes top genome lab. Science, 274, 908-910.
37. Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & de Vries, R. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature, 435, 737-738.
38. McCabe, D. L., & Pavela, G. R. (1998). The effect of institutional policies and procedures on academic integrity. In D. Burnett & L. Rudolph (Eds.), Academic integrity vs. the academic dishonesty of college students (pp. 75-94). Washington, DC: National Association of Student Personnel Administrators.
39. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T. (1987). Validation of the five-factor model of personality across instruments and observers. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 81-90.
40. Merrifield, P. R., Guilford, J. P., Christensen, P. R., & Frick, J. W. (1962). The role of intellectual factors in problem solving. Psychological Monographs, 76, 1-21.
41. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., & Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection measure: The low-fidelity simulation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75, 640-647.
42. Mumford, M. D. (2001). Something old, something new: Revisiting Guilford's conception of creative problem solving. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 267-276.
43. Mumford, M. D., & Gustafson, S. B. (1988). Creativity syndrome: Integration, application, and innovation. Psychological Bulletin, 103, 27-43.
44. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Brown, R. P., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., Antes, A. L., et al. (2008). Sensemaking approach to ethics training for scientists: Preliminary evidence of training effectiveness. Ethics and Behavior, 18, 315-339.
45. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, S., Scott, G., Espejo, J., Sohl, L. M., Hunter, S. T., et al. (2005). Career experiences and scientific performance: A study of social, physical, life, and health sciences. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 105-129.
46. Mumford, M. D., Devenport, L. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., Murphy, S. T., Hill, J. H., et al. (2006). Validation of ethical decision-making measures: Evidence for a new set of measures. Ethics and Behavior, 16, 319-345.
47. Mumford, M. D., Mobley, M. I., Uhlman, C. E., Reiter-Palmon, R., Doares, L. M. (1991). Process analytic models of creative capacities. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 91-122.
48. Mumford, M. D., Schultz, R. A., & Osburn, H. K. (2002). Planning in organizations: Performance as a muli-level phenomenon. In F. J. Yammarino & F. Dansereau (Eds.), Research in multi-level issues: The many faces of multi-level issues (pp. 3-63). Oxford, England: Elsevier.
49. Mumford, M. D., Supinski, E. P., Baughman, W. A., Costanza, D. P., & Threlfall, K. V. (1997). Process-based measures of creative problem-solving skills: V. Overall prediction. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 77-85.
50. National Institute of Medicine (2002). Integrity in scientific research: Creating an environment that promotes responsible conduct. Washington, DC: National Research Council.
51. O'Fallon, M. J., & Butterfield, K. D. (2005). A review of the empirical ethical decision-making literature: 1996-2003. Journal of Business Ethics, 59, 375-413.
52. Osborn, A. F. (1953). Applied imagination. New York: Scribners.
53. Osburn, H. K., & Mumford, M. D. (2006). Creativity and planning: Training interventions to develop creative problem-solving skills. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 173-190.
54. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598-609.
55. Ramey, C. H., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The "poetical activity" of Emily Dickinson: A further test of the hypothesis that affective disorders foster creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 16, 173-185.
56. Ruch, F. L., & Ruch, W. W. (1980). Employee aptitude survey. Los Angeles: Psychological Services.
57. Runco, M. A., Dow, G., & Smith, W. (2006). Information, experience, and divergent thinking: An empirical test. Creativity Research Journal, 18, 269-277.
58. Runco, M. A., & Nemiro, J. (2003). Creativity in the moral domain: Integration and implications. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 91-105.
59. Sass, L. A., & Schuldberg, D. (2001). Introduction to the special issue: Creativity and the schizophrenia spectrum. Creativity Research Journal, 13, 1-4.
60. Scott, G. M., Lonergan, D. C., & Mumford, M. D. (2005). Contractual combination: Alternative knowledge structures, alternative heuristics. Creativity Research Journal, 17, 79-98.
61. Steneck, N. H. (2004). Standards of ethical standards of conduct: Introduction to the responsible conduct of research. Washington, DC: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Research Integrity.
62. Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 53-74.
63. Sternberg, R. J. (1986). Toward a unified theory of human reasoning. Intelligence, 10, 281-314.
64. Sternberg, R. J. (1988). A three-facet model of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 125-147). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
65. Stokes, P. D., & Balsam, P. D. (2003). Effects of early strategic hints on sustained variability. Creativity Research Journal, 15, 331-341.
66. Street, M. D., Douglas, S. C., Geiger, S. W., & Martinko, M. J. (2001). The impact of cognitive expenditure on the ethical decision-making process: The cognitive elaboration model. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 256-277.
67. Taylor, J. A. (1953). A personality scale of manifest anxiety. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48, 285-290.
68. Tweney, R. D. (1992). Stopping time: Faraday and the scientific creation of perceptual order. Physis: Revista Internazionale di Storia Della Scienza, 29, 149-164.
69. Vincent, A. S., Decker, B. P., & Mumford, M. D. (2002). Divergent thinking, intelligence, and expertise: A test of alternative models. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 163-178.
70. Weick, K. E. (1995). Sensemaking in organizations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
71. Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Modes of expertise in creative thinking: Evidence from case studies. In K. A. Ericsson, N. Charness, P. J. Feltovich, & R. R. Hoffman (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of expertise and expert performance (pp. 761-787). New York: Cambridge University Press.
72. Wrightsman, L. S. (1974). Assumptions about human nature: A social-psychological approach (1st ed.). Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
73. Yaniv, I., & Kleinberger, E. (2000). Advice taking in decision making: Egocentric discounting and reputation formation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 83, 260-281.
74. Zuckerman, H. (1977). Scientific elite. New York: Free Press.