A new approach to assessing ethical conduct in scientific work

Accountability in Research

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 205-228

  Helton Fauth, Whitney ^a   Gaddis, Blaine ^a   Scott, Ginamarie ^a   Mumford, Michael ^a   Devenport, Lynn ^a   Connelly, Shane ^a   Brown, Ryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; BIOMEDICINE; CLASSIFICATION; EMPIRICAL APPROACH; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; EVALUATION; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HUMAN; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; PERSONNEL; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIOLOGY; STANDARD;

ANALYTICAL APPROACH; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; EMPIRICAL APPROACH;

BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; CLASSIFICATION; CODES OF ETHICS; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICAL REVIEW; ETHICS, PROFESSIONAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; EVALUATION STUDIES; GUIDELINES; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL SCIENCES; SOCIETIES;

EID: 1542636155     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/714906104     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Baker, I. L., O'Neill, H. F., and Linn, R. L. (1993). Policy and validity prospects for performance based assessment. Am Psychol., 48:1210-1218.
2. Bennett, R. E. (1993). On the meanings of constructed response. In Construction Versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement: Issues in Constructed Response, Performance Testing, and Portfolio Assessment edited by R. E. Bennett and W. C. Wards. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
3. Bernard, J. L., and Jara, C. S. (1986). The failure of clinical psychology graduate students to apply understood ethical principles. Prof Psychol: Res & Practice, 17:313-315.
4. Betts, G. H. (1932). The social code of 54 graduate students. Ed Trends: J Res Interpretation., 1:25-29.
5. Bornstein, B. H. (1998). From compassions to compensation: The effect of injury severity on mock jurors' liability judgments. J Applied Soc Psychol., 28:1477-1502.
6. Erber, J. T., Szuchman, L. T., and Prager, I. G. (2001). Ain't misbehavin': The effects of age and intentionality on judgments about misconduct. Psychol & Aging., 16:85-95.
7. Field, H. S., Barnett, N. J. (1978). Simulated jury trials: Students versus real people as jurors. J Soc Psychol., 104:287-293.
8. Fleishman, E. A. (1967). Development of a behavior taxonomy for describing human tasks: A correlational-experimental approach. J Applied Psychol., 51:1-10.
9. Fleishman, E. A. (1975). Toward a taxonomy of human performance. Am Psychologist, 30:1127-1149.
10. Fleishman, E. A., and Quaintance, M. K. (1984). Taxonomies of Human Performance: The Description of Human Tasks. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Gunz, H. P., Gunz, S. P., and McCutcheon, J. C. (2003). Organizational influences on approaches to ethical decisions by professionals: The case of public accountants [cited September 2003]. Avaliable from: http://www.arts.uwaterloo.ca/ACCT/courses/acc431Organizational_Influences_Submission_McLaughlin_Paper_Competition.doc.
12. Harrington, S. J. A test of a person-issue contingent model of ethical decision making in organizations. J Bus Ethics, 16:363-375.
13. Holt, R. W., Clifton, T. C., O'Connor, J. A., Smith, T.C., and Gessner, T. E. (1997). Influences of destructive personality information on juror decision making. J Applied Soc Psychol., 27:781-799.
14. Holyoak, W. (1984). Analogical thinking and human intelligence. In Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence edited by R. J. Sternberg. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
15. Jones, T. M. (1991). Ethical decision making by individuals in organizations: An issuecontingent model. Academy of Mgmt., 16:366-395.
16. Loomba, R. M. (1951). Moral judgments of university students of philosophy. Indian J Ed Res., 3:8.
17. Mislevy, R. J. (1993). A framework for studying differences between multiple-choice and free-response test items. In Construction Versus Choice in Cognitive Measurement: Issues in Constructed Response, Performance Testing, and Portfolio Assessment edited by R. E. Bennett and W. C. Wards. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
18. Motowidlo, S. J., Dunnette, M. D., and Carter, G. W. (1990). An alternative selection measure: The low-fidelity simulation. J Applied Psychol., 75:640-647.
19. Mumford, M. D., Baughman, W. A., and Sager, C. E. (2000). Picking the right material: Cognitive processing skills and their role in creative thought. In Critical Creative Thought edited by M. A. Runco. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton.
20. Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Helton, W. B., Strange, J. M., and Osburn H. K. (2001). On the construct validity of integrity tests: Individual and situational factors as predictors of test performance. Int J Selection Assessment, 9:240-257.
21. st century: The development of O*NET edited by N. G. Peterson, M. D. Mumford, W. C. Borman, P. R. Jeanneret, and E. A. Fleishman. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
22. Myers, B., and Arbuthnot, J. (1999). The effects of victim impact evidence on the verdicts and sentencing judgments of mock jurors. J Offender Rehab., 29:95-112.
23. Occupational Information Network (O*NET). (2001). United States Department of Labor [cited September 2001]. Available from http://online.onetcenter.org/.
24. Office of Research Integrity. (2001). United States Department of Health and Human Services, Rockville, MD [cited September 2001]. Available from http://ori.dhhs.gov/html/publications/newsletters.asp.
25. Online Ethics Center for Engineering and Science. (2001). Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH [cited September 2001]. Available from http://onlineethics.org.
26. Parsa, F., and Lankford, W. M. (1999). Students' views of business ethics: An analysis. J Applied Soc Psychol., 29:1045-1057.
27. Peterson, N. G., Mumford, M. D., Borman, W. C., Jeanneret, P. R., Fleishman, E. A., Levin, K. Y., Campion, M. A., Mayfield, M. S., Morgeson, F. P., Pearlman, K., Gowing, M. K., Lancaster, A. R., Silver, M. B., and Dye, D. M. (2001). Understanding work using the occupational information network (O*NET): Implications for practice and research. Personnel Psychol., 54:451-492.
28. Sackett, P. R., and Waneck, J. E. (1996). New developments in the use of measures of honesty, integrity, conscientiousness, dependability, trustworthiness, and reliability for personnel selection. Personnel Psychol., 49:787-829.
29. Sebrechts, M. M., Bennett, R. E., and Rock, D. A. (1991). Agreement between expert system and human raters' scores on complex constructed-response quantitative items. J Applied Psychol., 76:856-862.
30. Sims, R. L., and Keon, T. L. (1999). Determinants of ethical decision-making: The relationship of the perceived organizational environment. J Bus Ethics, 19:393-404.
31. Steneck, N. H. (2000). Assessing the integrity of publicly funded research. In Investigating Research Integrity: Proceedings of the First ORI Research Conference on Research Integrity edited by N. H. Steneck and M. D. Scheetz. Bethesda, MD: Office of Research Integrity.
32. Trevino, L., and Youngblood, S. A. (1990). Bad apples in bad barrels: A causal analysis of ethical decision making behavior. J Appl Psychol., 75:378-385.
33. Villanova, P. (1996).Predictive validity of situational constraints in general versus specific performance domains. J Applied Psychol., 81:532-547.
34. Villeneuve, A. O. (2000). Cognitive Expertise in Database Design. Boston University: Boston, MA.
35. Wiggins, M., and O'Hare, D. (1995). Expertise in aeronautical weather-related decision making: A cross-sectional analysis of general aviation pilots. J Exper Psychol., 1:305-320.
36. Wilson, D. W., and Donnerstein, E. (1977). Guilty or not guilty?: A look at the "simulated" jury paradigm. J Applied Soc Psychol., 7:175-190.
37. Zaccaro, S. J., Gilbert, J. A., Thor, K. K., and Mumford, M. D. (1991). Leadership and social intelligence: Linking social perspectives and behavioral flexibility to leader effectiveness. Leadership Q., 2:317-342.
38. Zaccaro, S. J., Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Marks, J. A., and Gilbert, T. A. (2000). Assessment of leader problem solving capabilities. Leadership Q., 11:37-64.