NLR sensors meet at the SGT1-HSP90 crossroad

Trends in Biochemical Sciences

Volumn 35, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 199-207

  Kadota, Yasuhiro ^a   Shirasu, Ken ^a   Guerois, Raphaël ^b,c  

^a RIKEN Center for Sustainable Resource Science   (Japan)

^b SERVICE DE CHIMIE BIOORGANIQUE ET DE MARQUAGE   (France)

^c CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMINO ACID DERIVATIVE; CHAPERONE; HEAT SHOCK PROTEIN 90; NUCLEOTIDE BINDING DOMAIN AND LEUCINE RICH REPEAT CONTAINING PROTEIN; PROTEIN RAR1; REGULATOR PROTEIN; SUPPRESSOR OF G2 ALLELE OF SKP1 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; BINDING SITE; EUKARYOTE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HUMAN; IMMUNE RESPONSE; MAMMAL; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FAMILY; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; PROTEIN STABILITY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REVIEW; TRANSCRIPTION REGULATION; VIRUS RESISTANCE;

ADAPTOR PROTEINS, SIGNAL TRANSDUCING; ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; GLUCOSYLTRANSFERASES; HSP90 HEAT-SHOCK PROTEINS; IMMUNITY, INNATE; MAMMALS; NOD SIGNALING ADAPTOR PROTEINS; PLANTS;

ANIMALIA; MAMMALIA;

EID: 77950962425     PISSN: 09680004     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibs.2009.12.005     Document Type: Review

References (69)

1. Ishii K.J., et al. Host innate immune receptors and beyond: making sense of microbial infections. Cell Host Microbe 2008, 3:352-363.
2. Shirasu K. The HSP90-SGT1 chaperone complex for NLR immune sensors. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2009, 60:139-164.
3. Jones J.D., Dangl J.L. The plant immune system. Nature 2006, 444:323-329.
4. Block A., et al. Phytopathogen type III effector weaponry and their plant targets. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:396-403.
5. Franchi L., et al. Function of Nod-like receptors in microbial recognition and host defense. Immunol. Rev. 2009, 227:106-128.
6. Martinon F., et al. The inflammasomes: guardians of the body. Annu. Rev. Immunol. 2009, 27:229-265.
7. Wang X., et al. Hsp90 cochaperone Aha1 downregulation rescues misfolding of CFTR in cystic fibrosis. Cell 2006, 127:803-815.
8. Pearl L.H., Prodromou C. Structure and mechanism of the Hsp90 molecular chaperone machinery. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 2006, 75:271-294.
9. Pratt W.B., et al. The Hsp90 chaperone machinery regulates signaling by modulating ligand binding clefts. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:22885-22889.
10. Sangster T.A., et al. Under cover: causes, effects and implications of Hsp90-mediated genetic capacitance. Bioessays 2004, 26:348-362.
11. Danot O., et al. Wheel of life, wheel of death: a mechanistic insight into signaling by STAND proteins. Structure 2009, 17:172-182.
12. Riedl S.J., et al. Structure of the apoptotic protease-activating factor 1 bound to ADP. Nature 2005, 434:926-933.
13. Yu X., et al. A structure of the human apoptosome at 12.8Å resolution provides insights into this cell death platform. Structure 2005, 13:1725-1735.
14. Marquenet E., Richet E. How integration of positive and negative regulatory signals by a STAND signaling protein depends on ATP hydrolysis. Mol. Cell 2007, 28:187-199.
15. Azevedo C., et al. The RAR1 interactor SGT1, an essential component of R gene-triggered disease resistance. Science 2002, 295:2073-2076.
16. Austin M.J., et al. Regulatory role of SGT1 in early R gene-mediated plant defenses. Science 2002, 295:2077-2080.
17. Takahashi A., et al. HSP90 interacts with RAR1 and SGT1 and is essential for RPS2-mediated disease resistance in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100:11777-11782.
18. Hubert D.A., et al. Cytosolic HSP90 associates with and modulates the Arabidopsis RPM1 disease resistance protein. EMBO J. 2003, 22:5679-5689.
19. Kitagawa K., et al. SGT1 encodes an essential component of the yeast kinetochore assembly pathway and a novel subunit of the SCF ubiquitin ligase complex. Mol. Cell 1999, 4:21-33.
20. Dubacq C., et al. Sgt1p contributes to cyclic AMP pathway activity and physically interacts with the adenylyl cyclase Cyr1p/Cdc35p in budding yeast. Eukaryot. Cell 2002, 1:568-582.
21. Steensgaard P., et al. Sgt1 is required for human kinetochore assembly. EMBO Rep. 2004, 5:626-631.
22. Martins T., et al. Sgt1, a co-chaperone of Hsp90 stabilizes Polo and is required for centrosome organization. EMBO J. 2009, 28:234-247.
23. Botër M., et al. Structural and functional analysis of SGT1 reveals that its interaction with HSP90 is required for the accumulation of Rx, an R protein involved in plant immunity. Plant Cell 2007, 19:3791-3804.
24. Lee Y.T., et al. Human Sgt1 binds HSP90 through the CHORD-Sgt1 domain and not the tetratricopeptide repeat domain. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:16511-16517.
25. Chen S., et al. Differential interactions of p23 and the TPR-containing proteins Hop, Cyp40, FKBP52 and FKBP51 with Hsp90 mutants. Cell Stress Chaperon. 1998, 3:118-129.
26. Azevedo C., et al. Role of SGT1 in resistance protein accumulation in plant immunity. EMBO J. 2006, 25:2007-2016.
27. Shirasu K., et al. A novel class of eukaryotic zinc-binding proteins is required for disease resistance signaling in barley and development in C. elegans. Cell 1999, 99:355-366.
28. Liu Y., et al. Role of SCF ubiquitin-ligase and the COP9 signalosome in the N gene-mediated resistance response to Tobacco mosaic virus. Plant Cell 2002, 14:1483-1496.
29. Liu Y., et al. Molecular chaperone Hsp90 associates with resistance protein N and its signaling proteins SGT1 and Rar1 to modulate an innate immune response in plants. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:2101-2108.
30. Bieri S., et al. RAR1 positively controls steady state levels of barley MLA resistance proteins and enables sufficient MLA6 accumulation for effective resistance. Plant Cell 2004, 16:3480-3495.
31. Leister R.T., et al. Molecular genetic evidence for the role of SGT1 in the intramolecular complementation of Bs2 protein activity in Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant Cell 2005, 17:1268-1278.
32. Holt B.F., 3rd, et al. Antagonistic control of disease resistance protein stability in the plant immune system. Science 2005, 309:929-932.
33. Kadota Y., et al. Structural and functional analysis of SGT1-HSP90 core complex required for innate immunity in plants. EMBO Rep. 2008, 9:1209-1215.
34. Mayor A., et al. A crucial function of SGT1 and HSP90 in inflammasome activity links mammalian and plant innate immune responses. Nat. Immunol. 2007, 8:497-503.
35. da Silva Correia J., et al. SGT1 is essential for Nod1 activation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:6764-6769.
36. Maor R., et al. Multidimensional protein identification technology (MudPIT) analysis of ubiquitinated proteins in plants. Mol. Cell. Proteomics 2007, 6:601-610.
37. Wu J., et al. Mammalian CHORD-containing protein 1 is a novel heat shock protein 90-interacting protein. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579:421-426.
38. Hahn J.S. Regulation of Nod1 by Hsp90 chaperone complex. FEBS Lett. 2005, 579:4513-4519.
39. Sbroggio M., et al. The mammalian CHORD-containing protein melusin is a stress response protein interacting with Hsp90 and Sgt1. FEBS Lett. 2008, 582:1788-1794.
40. Brancaccio M., et al. Melusin, a muscle-specific integrin β1-interacting protein, is required to prevent cardiac failure in response to chronic pressure overload. Nat. Med. 2003, 9:68-75.
41. Zhang M., et al. Structural and functional coupling of Hsp90- and Sgt1-centred multi-protein complexes. EMBO J. 2008, 27:2789-2798.
42. Ali M.M., et al. Crystal structure of an Hsp90-nucleotide-p23/Sba1 closed chaperone complex. Nature 2006, 440:1013-1017.
43. Catlett M.G., Kaplan K.B. Sgt1p is a unique co-chaperone that acts as a client adaptor to link Hsp90 to Skp1p. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:33739-33748.
44. Mickler M., et al. The large conformational changes of Hsp90 are only weakly coupled to ATP hydrolysis. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:281-286.
45. Hessling M., et al. Dissection of the ATP-induced conformational cycle of the molecular chaperone Hsp90. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2009, 16:287-293.
46. Phillips J.J., et al. Conformational dynamics of the molecular chaperone Hsp90 in complexes with a co-chaperone and anticancer drugs. J. Mol. Biol. 2007, 372:1189-1203.
47. Hubert D.A., et al. Specific Arabidopsis HSP90.2 alleles recapitulate RAR1 cochaperone function in plant NB-LRR disease resistance protein regulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:9556-9563.
48. Stuttmann J., et al. Staying in the fold: The SGT1/chaperone machinery in maintenance and evolution of leucine-rich repeat proteins. Plant Signal. Behav. 2008, 3:283-285.
49. Noël L.D., et al. Interaction between SGT1 and cytosolic/nuclear HSC70 chaperones regulates Arabidopsis immune responses. Plant Cell 2007, 19:4061-4076.
50. Spiechowicz M., et al. Hsp70 is a new target of Sgt1--an interaction modulated by S100A6. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2007, 357:1148-1153.
51. Lee Y.T., et al. Structure of the S100A6 complex with a fragment from the C-terminal domain of Siah-1 interacting protein: a novel mode for S100 protein target recognition. Biochemistry 2008, 47:10921-10932.
52. Rairdan G.J., et al. The coiled-coil and nucleotide binding domains of the Potato Rx disease resistance protein function in pathogen recognition and signaling. Plant Cell 2008, 20:739-751.
53. Tanabe T., et al. Regulatory regions and critical residues of NOD2 involved in muramyl dipeptide recognition. EMBO J. 2004, 23:1587-1597.
54. van Ooijen G., et al. Structure and function of resistance proteins in solanaceous plants. Annu. Rev. Phytopathol. 2007, 45:43-72.
55. Chisholm S.T., et al. Host-microbe interactions: shaping the evolution of the plant immune response. Cell 2006, 124:803-814.
56. Inohara N., et al. An induced proximity model for NF-kappa B activation in the Nod1/RICK and RIP signaling pathways. J. Biol. Chem. 2000, 275:27823-27831.
57. Mestre P., Baulcombe D.C. Elicitor-mediated oligomerization of the tobacco N disease resistance protein. Plant Cell 2006, 18:491-501.
58. Santamaria-Kisiel L., et al. Calcium-dependent and -independent interactions of the S100 protein family. Biochem. J. 2006, 396:201-214.
59. Johnson J.L., Toft D.O. A novel chaperone complex for steroid receptors involving heat shock proteins, immunophilins, and p23. J. Biol. Chem. 1994, 269:24989-24993.
60. Prodromou C., et al. Regulation of Hsp90 ATPase activity by tetratricopeptide repeat (TPR)-domain co-chaperones. EMBO J. 1999, 18:754-762.
61. McLaughlin S.H., et al. Stimulation of the weak ATPase activity of human hsp90 by a client protein. J. Mol. Biol. 2002, 315:787-798.
62. Siligardi G., et al. Regulation of Hsp90 ATPase activity by the co-chaperone Cdc37p/p50cdc37. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:20151-20159.
63. Panaretou B., et al. Activation of the ATPase activity of hsp90 by the stress-regulated cochaperone aha1. Mol. Cell 2002, 10:1307-1318.
64. Smith D.F. Dynamics of heat shock protein 90-progesterone receptor binding and the disactivation loop model for steroid receptor complexes. Mol. Endocrinol. 1993, 7:1418-1429.
65. Chen S., Smith D.F. Hop as an adaptor in the heat shock protein 70 (Hsp70) and hsp90 chaperone machinery. J. Biol. Chem. 1998, 273:35194-35200.
66. Hernandez M.P., et al. The assembly and intermolecular properties of the hsp70-Hop-hsp90 molecular chaperone complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2002, 277:38294-38304.
67. Faustin B., et al. Reconstituted NALP1 inflammasome reveals two-step mechanism of caspase-1 activation. Mol. Cell 2007, 25:713-724.
68. Dodds P.N., et al. Direct protein interaction underlies gene-for-gene specificity and coevolution of the flax resistance genes and flax rust avirulence genes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:8888-8893.
69. Jia Y., et al. Direct interaction of resistance gene and avirulence gene products confers rice blast resistance. EMBO J. 2000, 19:4004-4014.