Governing controversial science: Lessons from stem cell research

Policy and Society

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 301-314

  Mintrom, Michael ^a   Bollard, Rebecca ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 71549162564     PISSN: 14494035     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2009.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. American Association for the Advancement of Science. AAAS policy brief: Stem cell research (2007), American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC
2. Bardach E., and Kagan R.A. Going by the book: The problem of regulatory unreasonableness (2002), Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick
3. Benjamin, R. (2008). 'This is Not a Political Movement': State Sponsored Stem Cell Research and the Politics of Inclusion. Unpublished manuscript.
4. Bok D. The trouble with government (2001), Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
5. Check E. Q&A: Straight talk from ... Robert Klein. Nature Medicine 13 (April) (2007) 398
6. Covey S.M.R. The speed of trust: The one thing that changes everything (2006), Simon and Schuster, New York
7. Evans M.J., and Kaufman M.H. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature 292 (1981) 154-156
8. Forester J. The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes (1999), MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
9. Fukuyama F. Human biomedicine and the problem of governance. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 48 2 (2005) 195-200
10. Friedman M. Capitalism and freedom (1962), University of Chicago Press, Chicago
11. Gormley Jr. W.T. Policy, politics, and public utility regulation. American Journal of Political Science 27 (1983) 86-105
12. Hara N., Solomon P., Kim S.-L., and Sonnenwald D.H. An emerging view of scientific collaboration: Scientists' perspectives on collaboration and factors that impact collaboration. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 54 (2003) 952-965
13. Heinrich C.J., Hill C.J., and Lynn Jr. L.E. In: Patricia W.I., and Lynn Jr. L.E. (Eds). Governance as an organizing theme for empirical research. Chapter 1 in the art of governance: Analyzing management and administration (2004), Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
14. Hurlbut W.B. Science, religion, and the politics of stem cells. Social Research 73 3 (2006) 819-834
15. Johnson J.A., and Williams E.D. Stem cell research: CRS report for congress (2005), Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC [updated August 10]
16. Kolata G. Researcher Who helped start stem cell war may now end it. The New York Times 22 November (2007) A1
17. Lomax G.P., Hall Z.W., and Lo B. Responsible oversight of human stem cell research: The California institute for regenerative medicine's medical and ethical standards. PloS Medicine 4 May (2007) 803-805
18. Lupia A., and Matsusaka J. Direct democracy: New approaches to old questions. Annual Review of Political Science 7 (2004) 463-482
19. McCraw T.K. In: Charles Francis Adams, Brandeis L.D., Landis J.M., and Kahn A.E. (Eds). Prophets of regulation (1984), Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass
20. Magill G. The ethics weave in human genomics, embryonic stem cell research, and therapeutic cloning: Promoting and protecting society's interests. Albany Law Review 5 (2002) 701-728
21. Mintrom M. Competitive federalism and the governance of controversial science. Publius: The Journal of Federalism 39 (2009) 606-631
22. Moe T.M. Politics and the theory of organization. Journal of Law, Economics and organization 7 special issue (1991) 106-129
23. National Institutes of Health. Stem cells: Scientific progress and future research directions (2001), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
24. National Institutes of Health. Regenerative medicine (2006), National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
25. Ramalho-Santos M., and Willenbring H. On the origin of the term "Stem Cell". Cell Stem Cell 1 1 (2007) 35-38
26. Ringquist E.J., Worsham J., and Eisner M.A. Salience, complexity, and the legislative direction of regulatory bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 13 (2003) 141-164
27. Rose R. Lesson-drawing in public policy (1993), Chatham House, Chatham, NJ
28. Rose R. Learning from comparative public policy (2005), Routledge, New York
29. Samples S.B. Experts: Saviors and Charlatans. Chapter 3 in the Contrarian's guide to leadership (2002), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
30. Scholz J.T. Cooperative regulatory enforcement and the politics of administrative effectiveness. American Political Science Review 85 (1991) 115-136
31. Schön D.A., and Rein M. Frame reflection: Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies (1994), Basic Books, New York
32. Schultze C.L. The public use of private interest (1977), Brookings Institution, Washington
33. Thacher D., and Rein M. Managing value conflict in public policy. Governance 17 (2004) 457-486
34. Thomson J.A., Itskovitz-Eldor J., Shapiro S.S., Waknitz M.A., Swiergiel J.J., Marshall V.S., et al. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science 282 (1998) 1145-1147
35. Trivedi B. Researchers detour around stem-cell rules. Chronicle of Higher Education (2007) 5 October
36. Wills G. A necessary evil: A history of American distrust of government (1999), Simon and Schuster, New York
37. Withrow E. Global trade in human eggs thriving. The Washington Post (2007; (January)) 27
38. Yu J., Vodyanik M.A., Smuga-Otto K., Antosiewicz-Bourget J., Frane J.L., Tian S., et al. Induced pluripotent stem cell lines derived from human somatic cells. Science 20 November (2007) 115-126