The transition from laparoscopic to retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy: A matched pair pilot study

Transplantation

Volumn 89, Issue 7, 2010, Pages 858-863

  Troppmann, Christoph ^a   Daily, Michael F ^a   McVicar, John P ^a   Troppmann, Kathrin M ^a   Perez, Richard V ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Kidney graft survival; Kidney transplantation; Laparoscopy; Live donor nephrectomy; Retroperitoneoscopy

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DONOR SELECTION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY DONOR; KIDNEY GRAFT; KIDNEY ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; LIVING DONOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

ADULT; AGED; BIOLOGICAL MARKERS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CREATININE; DELAYED GRAFT FUNCTION; DONOR SELECTION; FEMALE; GRAFT SURVIVAL; HUMANS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MATCHED-PAIR ANALYSIS; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PILOT PROJECTS; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77950944249     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/TP.0b013e3181ca570f     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Maley WR, et al. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2000; 69: 2319.
2. Troppmann C, Ormond DB, Perez RV. Laparoscopic (vs. open) live donor nephrectomy: A UNOS database analysis of early graft function and survival. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 1295.
3. Troppmann C, Perez RV, McBride M. Similar long-term outcomes for laparoscopic versus open live-donor nephrectomy kidney grafts: An OPTN database analysis of 5532 adult recipients. Transplantation 2008; 85: 916.
4. Abbou CC, Rabii R, Hoznek A, et al. Nephrectomy in a living donor by retroperitoneal laparoscopy or lomboscopy. Ann Urol 2000; 34: 312.
5. Hoznek A, Olsson LE, Salomon L, et al. Retroperitoneal laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Preliminary results. Eur Urol2001; 40: 614.
6. Gill IS, Uzzo RG, Hobart MG, et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy for purposes of allotransplantation and au-totransplantation. J Urol 2000; 164: 1500.
7. Tsuchiya N, Iinuma M, Habuchi T, et al. Hand-assisted retroperito-neoscopic nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: Initial 44 cases. Urology 2004; 64: 250.
8. Wadström J. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrec-tomy: Experience from the first 75 consecutive cases. Transplantation 2005; 80: 1060.
9. Ruszat R, Sulser T, Dickenmann M, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: Donor outcome and complication rate in comparison with three different techniques. World J Urol 2006; 24: 113.
10. Gjertsen H, Sandberg AK, Wadström J, et al. Introduction of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy at Karolinska University Hospital Huddinge. Transplant Proc 2006; 38: 2644.
11. Fronek JP, Chang RW, Morsy MA. Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: First UK experience. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2006; 21: 2675.
12. Buell JF, Abreu SC, Hanaway MJ, et al. Right donor nephrectomy: A comparison of hand-assisted transperitoneal and retroperitoneal lapa-roscopic approaches. Transplantation 2004; 77: 521.
13. Dols LF, Kok NF, Terkivatan T, et al. Hand-assisted retroperitoneo-scopic versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy (Abstract #855). Am J Transplant 2009; 9(suppl 2): 437.
14. Yashi M, Takashi Y, Ishikawa N, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic hand-assisted live-donor nephrectomy according to the basic principle of transplantation in donor kidney selection. J Endourol 2007; 21: 589.
15. Tanabe K, Miyamoto N, Ishida H, et al. Retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy (RPLDN): Establishment and initial experience of RPLDN at a single center. Am J Transplant 2005; 5: 739.
16. Matas AJ, Bartlett ST, Leichtman AB, et al. Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: Survey of United Stated transplant centers. Am J Transplant 2003; 3: 830.
17. Chin EH, Hazzan D, Edye M, et al. The first decade of a laparoscopic donor nephrectomy program: Effect of surgeon and institution experience with 512 cases from 1996 to 2006. J Am Coll Surg 2009; 209: 106.
18. Troppmann C, Wiesmann K, McVicar JP, et al. Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 897.
19. Sundqvist P, Feuk U, Häggman M, et al. Hand-assisted retroperitoneo-scopic live donor nephrectomy in comparison to open and laparo-scopic procedures: A prospective studyondonor morbidity and kidney function. Transplantation 2004; 78: 147.
20. Bachmann A, Wyler S, Wolff T, et al. Complications of retroperitoneo-scopic living donor nephrectomy: Single center experience after 164 cases. World J Urol 2008; 26: 549.
21. Miura M, Harada H, Fukuzawa N, et al. Approaches for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy should be selected according to surgeon's skill and donor's physical status (Abstract #873). Am J Transplant 2009; 9(suppl 2): 442.
22. Aalbers AG, Biere SS, van Berge Henegouwen MI, et al. Hand-assisted or laparoscopic-assisted approach in colorectal surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Surg Endosc 2008; 22: 1769.
23. Marcello PW, Fleshman JW, Milsom JW, et al. Hand-assisted laparo-scopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial. Dis Colon Rectum 2008; 51: 818.
24. Kawauchi A, Fujito A, Soh J, et al. Learning curve of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy in less-experienced laparoscopic surgeons. Int J Urol 2005; 12: 1.
25. Dols LF, Kok NF, Alwayn IP,et al. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A plea for the right-sided approach. Transplantation 2009; 87: 745.
26. Saito M, Tsuchiya N, Narita S, et al. Laparoscopic versus retroperito-neoscopic living donor nephrectomy: Comparison of two procedures regarding clinical outcome and complication rate (Abstract #872). Am J Transplant 2009; 9(suppl 2): 441.
27. 2 pneumoperito-neum. Ann Surg 2000; 231: 195.