메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 77, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 521-525

Right donor nephrectomy: A comparison of hand-assisted transperitoneal and retroperitoneal laparoscopic approaches

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEUKOCYTE ANTIGEN;

EID: 10744227543     PISSN: 00411337     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.TP.0000109689.55999.FA     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (54)

References (18)
  • 1
    • 0033793569 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 3-year experience
    • Jacobs S, Cho E, Dunkin B. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: the University of Maryland 3-year experience. J Urol 2000; 164: 1494.
    • (2000) J Urol , vol.164 , pp. 1494
    • Jacobs, S.1    Cho, E.2    Dunkin, B.3
  • 2
    • 0000952216 scopus 로고
    • Surgical management of 50 patients with kidney transplant including 18 pairs of twins
    • Murray JE, Harrison JH. Surgical management of 50 patients with kidney transplant including 18 pairs of twins. Am J Surg 1963; 105: 205.
    • (1963) Am J Surg , vol.105 , pp. 205
    • Murray, J.E.1    Harrison, J.H.2
  • 3
    • 0035868284 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Should the indications for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy
    • Mandal A, Cohen C, Montgomery RA. Should the indications for laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy of the right kidney be the same as for the open procedure? Anomalous left renal vasculature is not a contraindication to laparoscopic left donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2001; 71: 660.
    • (2001) Transplantation , vol.71 , pp. 660
    • Mandal, A.1    Cohen, C.2    Montgomery, R.A.3
  • 4
    • 0032572282 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: Technical considerations and allograft vascular length
    • Ratner LE, Kavoussi L, Chavin K. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: technical considerations and allograft vascular length. Transplantation 1998; 65: 1657.
    • (1998) Transplantation , vol.65 , pp. 1657
    • Ratner, L.E.1    Kavoussi, L.2    Chavin, K.3
  • 5
    • 0034904302 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era
    • Troppmann C, Wiesmann K, McVicar J. Increased transplantation of kidneys with multiple renal arteries in the laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy era. Arch Surg 2001; 136: 897.
    • (2001) Arch Surg , vol.136 , pp. 897
    • Troppmann, C.1    Wiesmann, K.2    McVicar, J.3
  • 6
    • 0035029277 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted?
    • Buell J, Edye M, Johnson L, et al. Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted? Ann Surg 2001; 233: 645.
    • (2001) Ann Surg , vol.233 , pp. 645
    • Buell, J.1    Edye, M.2    Johnson, L.3
  • 7
    • 0033789789 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy for purposes of allotransplantation and autotransplantation
    • Gill IS, Uzzo R, Hobart MG, et al. Laparoscopic retroperitoneal live donor right nephrectomy for purposes of allotransplantation and autotransplantation. J Urol 2000; 64: 1500.
    • (2000) J Urol , vol.64 , pp. 1500
    • Gill, I.S.1    Uzzo, R.2    Hobart, M.G.3
  • 8
    • 0036141868 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: A new technique with preservation of vascular length
    • Turk IA, Deger S, Davis JW, et al. Laparoscopic live donor right nephrectomy: a new technique with preservation of vascular length. J Urol 2002; 167: 630.
    • (2002) J Urol , vol.167 , pp. 630
    • Turk, I.A.1    Deger, S.2    Davis, J.W.3
  • 9
    • 0042572899 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Prospective randomized comparison: Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy
    • Gill IS, Strzempkowski B, Kaouk J, et al: Prospective randomized comparison: transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy [abstract]. J Urol 2002; 167: 19.
    • (2002) J Urol , vol.167 , pp. 19
    • Gill, I.S.1    Strzempkowski, B.2    Kaouk, J.3
  • 10
    • 0034899356 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes war ischemia
    • Kerche K, Dahl D, Harland R, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy minimizes war ischemia. Urology 2001; 58: 152.
    • (2001) Urology , vol.58 , pp. 152
    • Kerche, K.1    Dahl, D.2    Harland, R.3
  • 11
    • 0033854193 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard?
    • Sasaki T, Finelli F, Bugarin E. Is the laparoscopic donor nephrectomy the new criterion standard? Arch Surg 2000; 135: 943.
    • (2000) Arch Surg , vol.135 , pp. 943
    • Sasaki, T.1    Finelli, F.2    Bugarin, E.3
  • 12
    • 0037738750 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy
    • Buzdon MM, Cho E, Jacobs SC, et al. Warm ischemia time does not correlate with recipient graft function in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Surg Endosc 2003; 17: 746.
    • (2003) Surg Endosc , vol.17 , pp. 746
    • Buzdon, M.M.1    Cho, E.2    Jacobs, S.C.3
  • 13
    • 0034940474 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the open approach
    • Stifelman MD, Hull D, Sosa ER, et al. Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison with the open approach. J Urol 2001; 166: 444.
    • (2001) J Urol , vol.166 , pp. 444
    • Stifelman, M.D.1    Hull, D.2    Sosa, E.R.3
  • 14
    • 0031441795 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    • Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, et al. Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 1997; 226: 483.
    • (1997) Ann Surg , vol.226 , pp. 483
    • Flowers, J.L.1    Jacobs, S.2    Cho, E.3
  • 15
    • 0037612203 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy
    • Perry KT, Freedland SJ, Hu JC, et al. Quality of life, pain and return to normal activities following laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus open mini-incision donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2003; 169: 2018.
    • (2003) J Urol , vol.169 , pp. 2018
    • Perry, K.T.1    Freedland, S.J.2    Hu, J.C.3
  • 16
    • 0042952918 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Basics of laparoscopic urologic surgery
    • Saunders, Philadelphia
    • Gill IS, Kerbl K, Meraney MA, et al. Basics of laparoscopic urologic surgery. In: Campbell's urology [ed. 8]. Saunders, Philadelphia 2002, pp 3455-3505.
    • (2002) Campbell's Urology [Ed. 8] , pp. 3455-3505
    • Gill, I.S.1    Kerbl, K.2    Meraney, M.A.3
  • 17
    • 10744233841 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy
    • Abreu SC, Goldfarb AD, Derweesh I, et al. Factors related to delayed graft function after laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. J Urol 2004; 171: 51.
    • (2004) J Urol , vol.171 , pp. 51
    • Abreu, S.C.1    Goldfarb, A.D.2    Derweesh, I.3
  • 18
    • 0036314948 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival
    • Hariharan MA, McBride WS, Cherikh CB. Post-transplant renal function in the first year predicts long-term kidney transplant survival. Kidney Int 2002; 62: 311.
    • (2002) Kidney Int , vol.62 , pp. 311
    • Hariharan, M.A.1    McBride, W.S.2    Cherikh, C.B.3


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.