Retroperitoneoscopic donor nephrectomy: Donor outcome and complication rate in comparison with three different techniques

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 113-117

  Ruszat, Robin ^a   Sulser, Tullio ^a   Dickenmann, Michael ^a   Wolff, Thomas ^a   Gürke, Lorenz ^a   Eugster, Thomas ^a   Langer, Igor ^a   Vogelbach, Peter ^a   Steiger, Jürg ^a   Gasser, Thomas C ^a   Stief, Christian G ^b   Bachmann, Alexander ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL BASEL   (Switzerland)

^b LUDWIG MAXIMILIANS UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Comparison of techniques; Donor nephrectomy; Laparoscopy; Retroperitoneoscopy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPE; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONOR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROBABILITY; RETROPERITONEUM; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME;

ADULT; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPES; LAPAROSCOPY; LIVING DONORS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROBABILITY; RETROPERITONEAL SPACE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 33644503180     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-006-0051-9     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Bachmann A, Dickenmann M, Gurke L, Giannini O, Langer I, Gasser TC, Steiger J, Sulser T (2004) Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: A retrospective comparison to the open approach. Transplantation 78:168-171
2. Buell JF, Hanaway MJ, Potter SR, Cronin DC, Yoshida A, Munda R, Alexander JW, Newell KA, Bruce DS, Woodle ES (2002) Hand-assisted laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy as an alternative to traditional laparoscopic living-donor nephrectomy. Am J Transplant 2:983-988
3. Chatterjee S, Nam R, Fleshner N, Klotz L (2004) Permanent flank bulge is a consequence of flank incision for radical nephrectomy in one half of patients. Urol Oncol 22:36-39
4. Flowers JL, Jacobs S, Cho E, Morton A, Rosenberger WF, Evans D, Imbembo AL, Bartlett ST (1997) Comparison of open and laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 226:483-489
5. Giessing M, Deger S, Ebeling V, Roigas J, Turk I, Loening SA (2003) Die laparoskopische transperitoneale Donornephrektomie. Urologe A 42:218-224
6. Greenstein MA, Harkaway R, Badosa F, Ginsberg P, Yang SL (2003) Minimal incision living donor nephrectomy compared to the hand-assisted laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. World J Urol 20:356-359
7. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C, Liao P, Bartlett ST (2004) Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 6-years experience. J Urol 171:47-51
8. Johnson EM, Remucal MJ, Gillingham KJ, Dahms RA, Najarian JS, Matas AJ (1997) Complications and risk of living donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 64:1124-1128
9. Ratner LE, Ciseck LJ, Moore RG, Cigarroa FG, Kaufman HS, Kavoussi LR (1995) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 60:1047-1049
10. Ratner LE, Kavoussi LR, Sroka M, Hiller J, Weber R, Schulam PG, Montgomery R (1997) Laparoscopic assisted live donor nephrectomy - A comparison with the open approach. Transplantation 63:229-233
11. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Maley WR, Cohen C, Burdick J, Chavin KD, Kittur DS, Colombani P, Klein A, Kraus ES, Kavoussi LR (2000) Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: The recipient. Transplantation 69:2319-2323
12. Schweitzer EJ, Wilson J, Jacobs S, Machan CH, Philosophe B, Farney A, Colonna J, Jarrell BE, Bartlett ST (2000) Increased rates of donation with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Ann Surg 232:392-400
13. Spanos PK, Simmons RL, Lampe E, Rattazzi LC, Kjellstrand CM, Goetz FC, Najarian JS (1974) Complications of related kidney donation. Surgery 76:741-747
14. Stifelman MD, Hull D, Sosa RE, Su L, Hyman M, Stubenbord W, Shichman S (2001) Hand assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: A comparison with the open approach. J Urol 166:444-448
15. Sulser T, Gurke L, Langer I, Dickenmann M, Steiger J, Gasser TC, Bachmann A (2004) Retroperitoneoscopic living donor nephrectomy: First clinical experiences after 19 operations. J Endourol 18:257-262
16. Sundqvist P, Feuk U, Haggman M, Persson AE, Stridsberg M, Wadstrom J (2004) Hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic live donor nephrectomy in comparison to open and laparoscopic procedures: A prospective study on donor morbidity and kidney function. Transplantation 78:147-153
17. Suzuki K, Ishikawa A, Ushiyama T, Fujita K (2002) Retroperitoneoscopic living donor-nephrectomy without gas insufflation: Five years Hamamatsu University Experience. Transplant Proc 34:720-721
18. Velidedeoglu E, Williams N, Brayman KL, Desai NM, Campos L, Palanjian M, Wocjik M, Bloom R, Grossman RA, Mange K, Barker CF, Naji A, Markmann JF (2002) Comparison of open, laparoscopic, and hand-assisted approaches to live-donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 74:169-172
19. Wolf JS Jr, Marcovich R, Merion JW, Konnak RM (2000) Prospective, case matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy. J Urol 163:1650-1653
20. Yang SC, Ko WJ, Byun YJ, Rha KH (2001) Retroperitoneoscopy assisted live donor nephrectomy: The Yonsei experience. J Urol 165:1099-1102