Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. laparoscopic colorectal surgery: A multicenter, prospective, randomized trial

Diseases of the Colon and Rectum

Volumn 51, Issue 6, 2008, Pages 818-828

  Marcello, Peter W ^a   Fleshman, James W ^b   Milsom, Jeffrey W ^c   Read, Thomas E ^d   Arnell, Tracey D ^e   Birnbaum, Elisa H ^b   Feingold, Daniel L ^e   Lee, Sang W ^c   Mutch, Matthew G ^b   Sonoda, Toyooki ^c   Yan, Yan ^b   Whelan, Richard L ^e  

^a LAHEY HOSPITAL AND MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c NEW YORK PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d WESTERN PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e New York Presbyterian Hospital Columbia University Medical Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Colon cancer; Diverticulitis; Hand assist; Hand assisted colecotmy; Laparoscopic colectomy; Laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy; Laparoscopic total colectomy; Laparoscopy; Ulcerative colitis

Indexed keywords

NARCOTIC AGENT;

ADULT; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON RESECTION; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIET; DRUG USE; FEMALE; HAND ASSISTED LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTESTINE FUNCTION; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGMOID; TOTAL COLON RESECTION;

EID: 44749091903     PISSN: 00123706     EISSN: 15300358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10350-008-9269-5     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Anonymous. Hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery vs standard laparoscopic surgery for colorectal disease: a prospective randomized trial. HALS Study Group. Surg Endosc 2000;14:896-901.
2. Vithiananthan S, Cooper Z, Betten K, et al. Hybrid laparoscopic flexure takedown and open procedure for rectal resection is associated with significantly shorter length of stay than equivalent open resection. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:927-35.
3. Targarona EM, Gracia E, Garriga J, et al. Prospective randomized trial comparing conventional laparoscopic colectomy with hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: applicability, immediate clinical outcome, inflammatory response, and cost. Surg Endosc 2002;16:234-9.
4. Cobb WS, Lokey JS, Schwab DP, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: a single-institution experience. Am Surg 2003;69:578-80.
5. Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery using GelPort: initial experience with a new hand device. Surg Endosc 2004;18:102-5.
6. Nakajima K, Lee SW, Cocilovo C, Foglia C, Sonoda T, Milsom JW. Laparoscopic total colectomy: hand-assisted vs standard technique. Surg Endosc 2004;18:582-6.
7. Rivadeneira DE, Marcello PW, Roberts PL, et al. Benefits of hand-assisted laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: a comparative study. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:1371-6.
8. Maartense S, Dunker MS, Slors JF, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus open restorative proctocolectomy with ileal pouch anal anastomosis: a randomized trial. Ann Surg 2004;240:984-91.
9. Ballantyne GH, Leahy PF. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy: evolution to a clinically useful technique. Dis Colon Rectum 2004;47:753-65.
10. Kang JC, Chung MH, Chao PC, et al. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colectomy vs open colectomy: a prospective randomized study. Surg Endosc 2004;18:577-81.
11. Chang YJ, Marcello PW, Rusin LC, Roberts PL, Schoetz DJ. Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid colectomy: helping hand or hindrance? Surg Endosc 2005;19:656-61.
12. Wilhelm TJ, Refeidi A, Palma P, Neufang T, Post S. Hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoid resection for diverticular disease: 100 consecutive cases. Surg Endosc 2006;20:477-81.
13. Schadde E, Smith D, Alkoraishi AS, Begos DG. Hand-assisted laparoscopic colorectal surgery (HALS) at a community hospital. Surg Endosc 2006;20:1077-82.
14. Lee SW, Yoo J, Dujovny N, et al. Laparoscopic vs. hand-assisted laparoscopic sigmoidectomy for diverticulitis. Dis Colon Rectum 2006;49:464-9.
15. Zhang LY. Hand-assisted laparoscopic vs. open total colectomy in treating slow transit constipation. Tech Coloproctol 2006;10:152-3.
16. Boushey R, Marcello PW, Martel G, et al. Laparoscopic total colectomy: an evolutionary experience. Dis Colon Rectum 2007;50:1512-19.
17. Milsom J, Bohm B, Nakajima. Laparoscopic colorectal surgery. New York: Springer-Verlag, 2006.
18. DeMets DL, Lan KK. Interim analysis: the alpha spending function approach. Stat Med 1994;13:1341-52.
19. O'Brien PC, Fleming TR. A multiple testing procedure for clinical trials. Biometrics 1979;35:549-56.
20. Senn S. Some controversies in planning and analysing multi-centre trials. Stat Med 1998;17:1753-65.
21. Marcello PW, Milsom JW, Wong SK, et al. Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: case-matched comparative study with open restorative proctocolectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2000;43:604-8.
22. Ky AJ, Sonoda T, Milsom JW. One-stage laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy: an alternative to the conventional approach? Dis Colon Rectum 2002;45:207-10.